Child Custody Battles Research Paper

About 10% of divorcing families have disagreements about custody that are significant enough to lead to court involvement about custody or visitation because according to Lebow and Black (2012) these parents also typically exhibit skills deficits in several areas. At the individual level, these parents often have difficulty understanding another person’s perspective and tend to focus on their own needs rather than on the needs of others. There is a possibility that these parents almost always have extreme difficulties with communication which ultimately leads to the court being involved.

     According to many the custody of a child should be determined with the best interest of the child in mind. However, it is not easy for a

Child custody have been an issue for many years but no clear rules have been established until approximately in the 1970’s. In the early colonial years, the arrangement was unappealing to children and their mothers and possibly doing psychologically damage. Luckily, history has evolved and children’s well-being has become a priority in divorce cases.

With fault based divorce in the 1960s, child custody depended primarily on the child’s age. If the child was under seven years old, also known as the ‘tender years,’ the mother would receive physical custody. This was because of the belief at the time that women are good caregivers and it was their job to take care of the children at home. However, if the children were older, custody would be granted to the parent of the same sex. Sometimes judges would also award custody of children dependent on martial or sexual conduct of the spouses. When custody was awarded in this way, the presiding judge could be more focused on the rights of the parents than what is best for the child in that situation. Either way, it was quite noticeable that child custody was based on the judge and their opinion, which could change from case to case.

In 1997 the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) created the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) to replace the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), which was created in 1968. Like the UCCJA, the new and improved UCCJEA served the purpose of “deter[ing] the removal or kidnapping of children, eliminat[ing] interstate jurisdictional competition, and prevent[ing] states from relitigating custody decisions from other states.” (Ehrlich, p. 411) Since its creation, the UCCJEA has been a major go-to reference for Courts in all states except Massachusetts and Vermont, who have not yet adopted said act, when considering the technicalities of jurisdiction for child custody cases.

The lawyers highly support a joint custody that would benefit the child. The lawyers argue the case on two different aspects.

The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) Program is a Federal/State/local partnership to collect child support: the program sends the strongest possible message that parents cannot walk away from their children. The goal is to ensure that children have the financial support of both their parents, to foster responsible behavior towards children, and to reduce welfare costs.

On Tuesday, November 29, 2016, this writer along with Inv. Hopkins and Inv. Lehn of the Metropolitan Police Department Youth And Family Services Division, Missing Person Unit were given this child custody investigation to investigate. .

I decided to go through the courts to determine custody because of several reasons. The first reason was because my son’s father was on the birth certificate and, the police stated that if he took my son from me, it would be considered kidnapping. So, it was in essence to protect my son first. Secondly, it was part of the process of getting child support as well as my restraining order. The restraining order was done through the civil courts and, the originally gave me full custody temporarily until the actual custody process could begin. While, I was planning on going through the custody court at some time, I had to begin the process early because of several court standards. Before I was able to put my son on CCAP, I had to put his father on child support or else I would be noncompliant with their orders. Also, with the severity of the reasons for the restraining order, the judge believed that it was necessary for me to begin it immediately. But, going through the process, I understand why many young mothers like me do not go through the courts to deal with this manner.

5- Should a battered spouse who refuses or is unable to sever the relationship with the battered lost custody of children?

Let's look at some examples of employment and how they may factor into your custody battle.

Going through with a divorce is a costly endeavor, both financially and emotionally, so having an affordable family lawyer Plano TX to work with for child custody matters is important. Going the route of child custody mediation provides parents with a viable alternative to the traditional divorce process and allows them to come up with a workable solution to benefit both parents and the children. Here are 5 benefits of using child custody mediation:

Is mediation different? Should children be included in mediation when the question of child custody is raised? While it may sometimes be beneficial to include some children in the mediation process, inclusion may raise concerns about the safety and wellbeing of the child and about the confidentiality of the proceeding.

In the courts, the mediator has an essential role in the dissolution of marriages and relationships, especially when it comes to child custody. According to California Family Code 3161, the purposes of custody mediation proceedings are:

Child support is the defined as the monthly payments made by the non-custodial parent to help cover the financial care of their child or children. Those payments go to the custodial parent, caregiver, or guardian. In family law, child support is usually arranged during a dissolution of marriage, divorce, or after the determination of paternity.