Child Custody In The 1970's

Child relocation laws and best practices in the United States vary from state to state. Child custody in Arizona is defined as “legal decision-making” for the child and visitation is known as “parenting time”. The term “child custody” is no longer used, effective January 1, 2013. The court can order one or both parties to have legal decision-making authority for the child(ren) and consider many factors, falling under A.R.S. 25-403. In the case of joint legal decision-making authority, both parents must work together to make decisions regarding the child. If one parent is granted sole legal decision-making authority, they make decisions about the child without consenting the other parent as long as it

Each year about 1.2 million marriages end in divorce, and many divorcing couples have children (Patel&Jones, 2008). In the year 2006 more than 1.1 million children were living with a parent who was divorced or separated. Though most parents face the challenges associated with divorce or separation in a healthy and successful manner without high-conflict interactions. However, according to Patel and Jones about 10% of divorce cases involving children disagreement on custody and visitation arrangements leads to litigation(2008). In these cases, it is often left to the court to make decisions about custody, and several custody cases are referred to court-appointed mental health experts during the process.

In 1997 the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws (NCCUSL) created the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) to replace the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), which was created in 1968. Like the UCCJA, the new and improved UCCJEA served the purpose of “deter[ing] the removal or kidnapping of children, eliminat[ing] interstate jurisdictional competition, and prevent[ing] states from relitigating custody decisions from other states.” (Ehrlich, p. 411) Since its creation, the UCCJEA has been a major go-to reference for Courts in all states except Massachusetts and Vermont, who have not yet adopted said act, when considering the technicalities of jurisdiction for child custody cases.

Today, the subject about children custody is commonly discussed about. Children are often left to the hands of those who are thought to be “better.” A child’s environment and the care he/she receives is a major point in deciding where the custody of the child land. Many parents lose their children due to their “inability” to raise their child. A good amount of kids are torn away from their parent’s love and affection due to the parent’s financial status or other devastating reasons.

There is no statute, formula or template which the courts would rely upon to decide cases related to children visitation. The relationships between parties, such as non-custodian parent, de factor parent, same sex partner, grandparents, aunt and uncle and the children subject to visitation dispute are complex. During the last several decades, the phrase “best interest of the child” has evolved. Many states have a set of criteria to define the “best interest of the child;” however, the State of Massachusetts is among a few states which reserves the trial judges with judicial authority and discretion to decide based on the material facts and evidence presented at trial.

Evidence: Following Baumann’s meta-analysis of the effects of different types of custody on parents, he concluded that joint custody parents have higher levels of satisfaction and adjustment by avoiding the “sole parenting responsibility, interparental conflicts, . . . confusion” and numerous other factors that sole-custodial families face ("Child Adjustment in Joint-Custody Versus Sole-Custody Arrangements: A Meta-Analytic Review." 497).

Another big factor that the judge will consider is the relationship that each child had with each parent. Unless absolutely necessary, the judge will not assign custody of the children to a parent with whom they never got along, and who obviously does not deeply love them. Additionally, if one parent has shown any inclination toward physical, mental, emotional, or sexual abuse of any of the children, then their chances of being assigned custody will dramatically decrease.

In child custody situations where legal custody has been awarded, the parent with legal custody is the one who is charged with the responsibility of making decisions on behalf of the minor child(ren).

There is two separate areas when discussing custody of a child. The two areas is physical and legal custody. In shared legal custody, no matter which parent you spend more time with, both parents have equal say concerning the child’s welfare. Whereas in shared physical custody, the child gets the necessities from both parents. According to Census Bureau, a principal agency of the United States Federal Statistical System, 64% of children (18 and under) in the U.S. live with both parents (Custody 1). When parents form a friendly and communicated relationship, the long term outcomes of the child is much better then when a child has parents who constantly have conflicts or when there is only one parent in the child’s life (Sullivan 1). It’s crucial when both parents and children keep each other updated on events and activities to ensure that everyone is informed in the family (“Custody” 1). If there is a highly recommendation to a shared calendar in court, such as a google drive calendar, then parents are given the resources to start having a communicated

To understand custody laws, you must consult first the court of jurisdiction. It is because custody laws vary from state to state. For example, a non-custodial parent needs to file a lawsuit against the custodial parent who does not follow the visitation rules

Just like every state, California has guidelines in their statutes that outline the what, where, how, and why of child support. The primary purpose of child support in Riverside, California is to do just that; support the child financially in order to provide for their needs. As far as the courts are concerned, that means whatever is in the best interest of the child (children).

One of the first things that will need to be determines is if both parents will share legal custody, or if one parent will have sole legal custody.

A child’s well-being weighs heavy on the mind of any parent – especially one going through a divorce. While these concerns may prompt parents to reconcile, in situations involving abuse, they may also serve as a catalyst for the breakup. Regardless of the reasoning behind a divorce, determinations pertaining to visitation and child custody must be made to ensure the safety and welfare of the children. Below, Torrington, CT family law lawyer Jeannine from The Law Office and Mediation Center of Jeannine M. Talbot answers three frequently asked questions regarding visitation rights.

Physical custody refers to the location where the child physically resides. In an ideal situation, each parent would have joint custody. That, however, does not mean that the responsibilities are split down the middle. If one is seeking sole—or full—physical custody,

Parental responsibility can be one of the most rewarding experiences in your life. The unconditional love between you and your child is probably one of the genuine and exciting things you have ever come across. In a case of conflicts between you and the other child's parent, however, the situation may exceed to such a level that you may be pushed in a court hearing for some reasons, such as child custody hearing or a child support hearing.