Child Custody Investigation Summary

lived in upstate New York. David Smith moved Kaiko Smith and her two children, ages 12 and

This is an investigation of a missing person. George Erik James, a previous gang member with East Side Piru, was last seen by his parents the day before Thanksgiving in 1998. From what Mr. and Mrs. James said George left because him and his mom got into an argument. Before we began investigating this case, it seemed like George just left without contacting his family. With George being an adult, it didn’t seem like he ran away or got kidnapped. That argument could’ve been the last straw for George, therefore, making him storm off without telling his family where he was going.

In conclusion, this paper has addressed the controversial issue that face the court when it comes to the controversy on the time-honored question should/or should not the court allow children to testify in child custody cases. Also, to sum it up that the BICS has a lot of weak points that needs to be changed when it comes to child custody. However, there are mores states that have their own option about children testifying in custody cases.

Dallas County DHR’s representatives revealed through testimony that the non-custodial parent (NCP), Tyrone Smith has three child support cases. Spreadsheets were processed through to June 2015 regarding the money paid and the court order amount; including changes and credit given when the NCP was in prison on July 6, 2015. The case with the custodial parent (CP), Malinda Smith, the balances owed is arrears $6,201.35 and interest $14,526.71. The second case, the CP, Louis Reeves, shows the balances owed are interest $3,259.08 and medical support $55.10. The last case with the CP, Rosa Dukes, the balances owed is arrears $232.25 and interest $3,738.84. Based on the spreadsheets, the amounts are correct on all the child support cases. The spreadsheets do not include the month of July; interest will accrue.

5. How a divorce and child custody investigator in Austin can resolve your family problems?

I am 31 male, divorced, though very well settled financially and professionally. I am done with my previous relationship last year. Now there are few things which keep on bothering me.

There are many confusing components to divorce, but one of the most confounding is the issue of child custody, specifically, the differences between legal custody and physical custody. Seiler & Parker P.C., L.L.O., is a team of family law lawyers serving clients throughout the Hastings, Nebraska, area. They are committed to giving you the information you need to make the best decisions for your case and for the future of your family.

Children in custody battles often feel confused and voiceless, I would know because I have been one of them, stuck between two moms. I work in child care as a nanny, babysitter, and within the last year, I began my work as a Companion or Supervisor for children in custody battles. I accompany them to visitations with the parent who did not receive custody because of previous neglect and act as a Supervisor as recognized by the court. These children are not heard in the custody cases when their parents fight for guardianship and many go through this traumatic experience alone. My empathy runs deep because I struggled through this first hand as a child when my two mothers, once in a domestic partnership, separated due to my adopted mom’s struggles with alcoholism.

The field of family law governs all types of interactions within the family. One area of family law that may be important to many is child custody. Child custody determines the rights of both parents to not only visit with children, but also make important decisions in the child's life. Many people might not be aware that there are two different and important aspects to child custody: legal custody and physical custody. Legal custody refers to the parent's decision-making authority for important decisions in the child's life. Such decisions include education, medical care, and religious upbringing. Physical custody refers to where the child resides.

Child custody arrangements have evolved over the years from a time when children were once seen as property of the father. This began to change as society became more focused on the development of children, understanding the formative years of childhood evolved into adulthood. Mothers have historically been granted custody in the majority of custody cases as determined in nineteenth century by the tender year’s doctrine. Once the tender years doctrine had been determined to be in violation of the fourteenth amendment the primary caretaker rule was developed based on who was the primary caretaker prior to the divorce. With the increase in divorce rates and the legislation of Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act of 1976 set the standard for the Best Interests of the Child. The best interest of the child concept moved away from parental rights, focusing on several factors such as relationships between parent and child, school and home adjustments, mental and physical wellbeing of parents, and wishes of both parents.

On December 16, 2016 at approximately 0906 hours, while working as a school resource officer I was contacted by Sanford Police dispatch in reference to a suspicious incident at Goldsboro Elementary School. Upon arriving at the main office I made contact with complainant Keisha Brown and her son/victim Kayleb Bridges.

On September 3, 2015, I was assigned this case to follow up. This case involves Ms Miranda Maria Celia a seventeen year old runaway female. I contacted Maria Miranda (parent) who reported that they moved to Baltimore, but that her daughter was back. Ms. Miranda agreed to call me back on Spetember 4, 2015, while she obtains a permanent address. I received no futher calls back.

NYPD detectives came out to the home and interviewed mother, mother indicated child has never runaway nor has child ever not come straight home from school. When asked about child’s father, mother indicated father of child has had no contact with child since her birth. Further questioning of mother revealed mother and 12-year-old daughter live alone in the home with no other family members within proximity as all family is out of state. Childs school is approximately ten minutes from the home and child walks to school daily by

In child custody cases, the legal field approves the methods used by psychologists, yet argues that “psychologists must understand that lawyers are trained to work in an adversarial system in which their role is to advocate the client’s best interests” (Lee, Beauregard, & Hunsley, 1998, p.118). With that being said, lawyers in child custody cases are supportive and even encourage psychological involvement in the determination of the child’s best interests, yet also argue that it is essential for them to have some knowledge of family law. The main purpose of a lawyer is to defend his client regarding of what psychologists have to say. However, they still have a word about the methods used in custody evaluation (Lee et al., 1998,

At anytime a divorce processing involves kids, it complicates subject. The connection you create with your former partner can highly impact the development as well as physical health of your kids. The San Antonio child custody lawyers are always ready to aid you to navigate through the lawful procedure of getting a custody declaration as well as start the healing approach for you as well as your loveable children to live a regular life. The lawyers have announced, the requirements of the kids are of initial significant. Their aim is to make a win-win condition for parents thus they can sustain a lifestyle where their kids thrive. Their put their innovative skills as well as experiences and insight to access negotiating as well as creating kids custody agreements along with parenting schedules that operate for families. The attorneys have high experience and capable to handle difficult cases for couples along with kids and aiding parents along with