Child Rearing In Higher Social Classes

Overall, my reaction to Gerstel/Sarkisian’s thesis statement is confusing at first but then it start to make sense when I can understand their main points of the article. At first I feel complicate when Gerstel and Sarkisian talk about the lack of education matters to the standard in American families because I thought they talk about social class is reason in family connections. However, as I go through the texts over again, I can see how the authors are trying to say. They want the readers as well I am, to understand that the aspect of education is matter, but social class has higher impact on the family involvement. It leads us to the point that we finally understand why

As specific contexts, currently, some people are having abundant wealth and social capital, whereas the rest lack of social and financial resources they need. There are various ways to success and obtain psychological well-being, but growing up with more financial sources and living with parents who are highly educated always makes individual to become successful and easier to promote social and emotional competence when compared to individuals from

She also talks about how middle class parenting differs from the other social class. The middle class parents mostly dominate the lives of their children while the working class parents cannot concentrate that much on their kids. She also brought a name for this phenomena called “Concerted Cultivation”.

Accordint to the author Gonzalez-Mena, “The Status—that is, the family’s position in society—affects socialization and can in turn affect expectations as well as where children find themselves” (p.126). That is, children socialization is greatly affected by the status of the family due to, the different expectation between children belonging to rich families and that children living in poverty.

In the study Lareau conducted, it can be see that working class and poor families differ slightly in that being poor means less resources and a means of a greater struggle for the child. The similarities found explain why being lower class has it benefits in some areas then if you were middle or upper class. Now Lareau is not telling people to raise their children one way or that being rich is better because even the rich have many disadvantages their children encounter. Lareau emphasizes, “Overall, daily life for working-class and poor children is slower paced, less pressured, and less structured than for their middle- and

Contrastingly, middle class parents, who have a college degree and a career, feel an obligation to mold their children into well-rounded adults. Therefore, middle class families have extremely hectic schedules with the parents’ occupations, children’s education, numerous

This week’s readings are following the theme of the class, and its connection to forming a family and child rearing. There are three articles that discuss the way children are raised, the effect of marriage on the class and on the growing inequality as well as the pressure that people face due to instability in their jobs and economic life. Connecting socioeconomics and sociocentrism orientation, class and family are shown from different angles in order to understand inequalities and class divisions.

Lareau explains how different social class: middle class, working class, and lower class have individual parenting styles to discipline their child. Using the technique of naturalistic observations, the author analyzed that the relationship of children between their families and the extrinsic world differs by their social class. Each chapter takes the reader on a journey of one child’s experiences at home and in social institutions and how different parenting styles influence a child’s life at home and in the outside world. Through her study, the author discovered significant differences between each social classes, in regards to the practices of child-rearing. Lareau explains that how distinctive practices of child-rearing in different social classes can result in social class inequality.

Changes in the economy contributed to changed ideas about class, gender, and family. The ideas of “republican motherhood” that had been prevalent following the American Revolution, gave way to the “cult of domesticity”. Women were expected to remain in the household and were relegated to second-class citizens. Additionally, children in urban households were much more likely to leave the family in search of work than they had been in the rural world. This was because of the shift of income-earning work out of the home.

Wealthier families lead their children to “learn a sense of ‘entitlement’”(Gladwell 105). Wealthier families are wealthier, they can do more for their child as far as money is concerned. Who we are can be based on where we’re from. Growing up with the same set of morals and same conditions as those around us can lead to a generalisation of us all. If your mother grew up with no strong parent figure, she could carry on the same neglect while raising you and so on.

Wealth and Income Inequality in America The United States of America was founded upon the ideals of freedom and equal opportunity for all individuals. Many people strive to achieve the American Dream by enhancing their socioeconomic status. Today, many people argue that these rightful values are no longer relevant due to the growing income and wealth disparity between different social classes. Income and wealth are two social issues that are commonly misinterpreted; although the two concepts are related, the overall concepts are a little bit different.

All families want their children to be happy, healthy, and grow. Social classes make a difference in how parents go about meeting this goal. In Annette Lareau book, Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life, she promotes middle class parents as concerted cultivation. Middle class parents encourage their children’s talents, opinions, and skills. For example, engaging their children in organized activities and closely monitoring children’s experiences in school. According to Lareau, middle class children gain an emerging sense of entitlement through this pattern of converted cultivation. This causes a focus on children’s individual development. There are signs that the middle class children gain advantages from the experience of concerted cultivation. However, the working class and poor children do not gain this advantage.

In the article, “Invisible Inequality; Social Class and Childbearing in Black Families and White Families” by Annette Lareau, raises the idea that income inequality influence parental investments in children. Lareau introduces two parenting styles to which she attributes the reproduction of inequality; concerted cultivation and natural growth. As stated concerted cultivation occurs relatively within middle-class families and it concentrates on the organization of leisure activities among children, while natural growth tends to happen among the working class and it refers to the belief that as longest parents provide food, love and safety to their children, they will thrive. Thus, the family in this context plays an important role to the reproduction of inequality by the practice different parenting

Social class is a standout amongst the most essential ideas in the investigation of human science. Social Class is a social classification and division that outcomes from the unequal dissemination of riches, influence, and notoriety. Social Class influences where and how we live, how we see training, and even the way we wed and bring up our kids. If we partition the populace into three general classifications; lower, center, and high society, we discover individuals on the base are less inclined to have great wellbeing, more prone to be engaged with a savage wrongdoing, and more prone to encounter depression (Palen, 2015). I discovered especially intriguing or bizarre that the childrearing practices of guardians are firmly fixing to social

Another defining factor for social class is education especially since education is seen as an achievement toward the American Dream. (Lareau, 235). Younger generations seem to place more emphasis on achieving higher education and the occupational opportunities provided for those who are well-educated (Cherlin, 113). The socioeconomic stratification corresponds to those with differing levels of education such as upper/middle class individuals have a college education while working/lower class have some college and/or minimal high school education (Cherlin, 118-119). These individuals and their given circumstances based on education and income have different values and trends about marriage, family and socialization/rearing of children. (Cherlin, 114-117). Family inequality is then based on direct obtainment for individuals who are head of these households such as employment of fathers and mothers (Cherlin, 111), which in turn affects the childhood/family experience of child within the socioeconomic status of their parents. (Lareau,