Child Support Case Study

Mr. Conklin’s legal representative revealed through the testimony of the non-custodial parent (NCP), James W. Conklin, that he was divorced from the custodial parent (CP), Kathleen Conklin, in 1989 in the Circuit Court of Madison County. He stated that the documentation presented as Conklin Exhibit 5-Payment Record Letter from the Common Wealth of Virginia Department of Social Service Division of Child Support Enforcement shows as of May 10, 2004 on the NCP’s account the amount of arrears, a record of payments, and charges. The document indicates that the NCP was behind $3,548.49 as of May 10, 2004; the NCP was paying child support. The youngest child was Jason, date of birth May 7, 1985; by May 10, 2004, he reached the age of 19. The

I attended a hearing on your behalf in the above-referenced matter before Judge Burke in Hudson, New York, on 05/17/2017. The claimant was present by phone and was represented by attorney Bob King. Mr. Rumsey was present from the Special Funds 15-8 Unit.

Father contends that the circuit court erred by denying his motion to modify its child-support order. Mother avers, however, that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion by failing to modify its child-support order. We agree with Mother.

The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) Program is a Federal/State/local partnership to collect child support: the program sends the strongest possible message that parents cannot walk away from their children. The goal is to ensure that children have the financial support of both their parents, to foster responsible behavior towards children, and to reduce welfare costs.

The Department’s Representative contends that the household was receiving benefits and was due for renewal. The household consisted of the Appellant’s husband who is receiving Home and Community Based Service benefits under the MA program and the Appellant was receiving State payment of her Medicare Part B Premium. The Appellant’s total monthly income was Social Security benefits in the amount of $855.00 and a monthly annuity in the amount of $66.00, totaling $921.00. The Appellant’s spouse received income of $767.00 from Social Security benefits. The total household income was combined

The evidence in file shows the claimant has a history of memory loss since 2015. On 12/23/15, the claimant seemed more depressed she was unkempt and non-compliant with medication. She notes she started to care less about herself after the death of her mother The office visit on 9/7/16 shows the claimant continued isolating herself

In Florida there are a lot of ways for the state to enforce child support orders among these are late payment notices, income withholding, federal income tax refund intercept, garnishment, passport denial and more. With late payment notices the parent who owes child support is mailed notices. After that they can move to income withholding, this means that the state will send an income withholding notice to the employer and any other payer of income, payments are then withheld and sent directly to the state. After this is driver license and registration suspension, in this case the parent would be mailed a notice asking them to come into an office to speak with someone. The parent is also mailed a notice stating that their license and registration may be suspended if they don’t pay what they owe to the other parent, sign a written agreement for the payment of the past due support, or file a petition with the courts to contest the issue within twenty days.

Tuscaloosa County DHR Child Support representative’s testimony revealed that on January 17, 2012 the agency scheduled a Child Support hearing for paternity to be established. The custodial parent (CP), Temeka White, did not appear for the hearing on September 24, 2013. Actually, on September 13, 2013, a subpoena was issued. The subpoena was mailed to the CP’s address at 3412½ 7th Street, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401. On September 23, 2013, the subpoena was returned; the CP was not served. The CP did not show for the September 24, 2013 hearing. On April 17, 2015, a subpoena was issued for the CP to show for a court hearing on May 5, 2015. The subpoena was mailed to the CP at address 3758 8th Street, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35401 and to the address

On September of 2014, the home child care provider was closed because one of the Ms Roberts’ children was molested/abused by one of the child care provider family members. She wanted to know if would Ms Robert still be responsible to pay the copay. If not, then which DHS office will

This week I had the pleasure of sitting in on five hearings. On Monday Magistrate Akel allowed me to observe a child support hearing where both parties were living in Iowa. The initial order was given while the couple lived in Florida. When the father moved to Iowa he was ordered to pay $509.00 dollars a month in child support. The mother sent the child to Iowa to visit his father for a week but the child never came back to Florida. While the child was in the father’s custody he continued to pay child support to the mother. During the hearing, the father wanted to ensure that his ex – wife placed the money that she owed him into a depository account. The attorney representing the father pointed out that she was behind in paying him back. The attorney as well as the father believed that the she was using the money to support her other children. The mother claimed that all of the money that she owed her ex-husband was already in the depository. Magistrate Akel made sure that the mother was aware that if the money was not there she would be held in contempt of court.

Dallas County DHR’s representatives revealed through testimony that the non-custodial parent (NCP), Tyrone Smith has three child support cases. Spreadsheets were processed through to June 2015 regarding the money paid and the court order amount; including changes and credit given when the NCP was in prison on July 6, 2015. The case with the custodial parent (CP), Malinda Smith, the balances owed is arrears $6,201.35 and interest $14,526.71. The second case, the CP, Louis Reeves, shows the balances owed are interest $3,259.08 and medical support $55.10. The last case with the CP, Rosa Dukes, the balances owed is arrears $232.25 and interest $3,738.84. Based on the spreadsheets, the amounts are correct on all the child support cases. The spreadsheets do not include the month of July; interest will accrue.

5. How a divorce and child custody investigator in Austin can resolve your family problems?

Mobile County DHR Child Support’s testimony revealed that the custodial parent (CP), Parizzia Seltzer, applied for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits on July 17 2014 for herself and one child. The CP was interviewed on July 24, 2014. The CP signed the Affirmation on July 24, 2014 that she acknowledged that she understood that she is to cooperate with the Child Support Program or her benefits may be reduced or stopped. On May 4, 2015, a CA50 Alert was cleared from Session dated May 1, 2015 stating the client failed to appear at the DHR’s office for an interview on April 29, 2015. This was the second incident of non-compliance, it was coded on the FACET system; the case auto close on May 31, 2015 with the disqualification period of June 2015 to November 2015. The TANF eligibility worker contacted Child Support on June 26, 2015 and spoke with Customer Service, who confirmed that the CP had an appointment at 8:00 a.m. on April 29, 2015. On June 9, 2015, the CP requested a hearing in writing and requested that her case be reopened until the hearing. The case was reinstated effective June 11, 2015.

SC end call with Pa and placed call to PowerBack Rehab and spoke with Gwen a receptionist. SC identified-self, where SC is calling from and stated reasons for calling. SC requested to know the Pa’s admission and discharged dates to PowerBack rehab. Gwen reported that the Pa was admitted to the facility on 12/22/2015 and discharge home on 1/22/2016. SC asked the reason for Pa’s stay and Gwen stated she was unable to access that information and forward SC to the social service department where SC got Stephanie Black VM. SC left a detailed message with contact information and ended call. SC placed called to Hahnemann Hospital admission department and spoke with Yolanda. SC Identified self and sated reason for calling. Yolanda verified Pa’s stated claims of the date she was admitted and discharged. The Pa was admitted to the hospital on 12/14/2015 for surgery and discharged to PowerBack rehab on 12/22/2015. SC thanks Yolanda and ended call. SC then placed call to PPL and was on hold for some time but later spoke with Quincy. SC identified self and stated reason for calling. The SC asked Quincy if the DCW was paid for any day(s) from

Friday September 24, 2016 Rebecca Mackay was escorted to the Social Security Administration office, to gain information on the status of financial benefits, and to obtain a Social Security card. The Employee at the Social Security Administration office, stated that Rebecca nor I could not obtain any information about the status on her financial benefits due to her having a payee. Only the payee is privileged to the information of financial records, however Rebecca was able to apply for a Social Security card, and should be receiving the card in the mail soon. Learning of the new found, I immediately contacted the case manager Diane Roberson, at the (The Up Center, Portsmouth) left a voicemail that described the rules of the Social Security