Children At Risk For Late Onset Diseases

There are two main ways genetic testing places a constraint on a child’s right to an open future. The first of these is that the revelation of a child’s disease status can change his life narrative and the way parents and others treat him, and substantially alter his or her life’s trajectory (Davis _____). Parents may feel guilty or shelter their not-yet-sick

Due to the lack of adequate interpretation, I do not foresee buying my genome sequencing in the near future. A few of my close relatives have certain medical conditions that concern me, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Even so, I prefer to live a life without the fear of what my DNA profile might uncover. If the test determined that I have an increased risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, my stress level may increase every time I lose my keys. For example, I have a friend that was terrified of having a child that may have schizophrenia because the child’s grandmother suffered from the condition. During her daughter’s infant years, my friend suffered from stress as she watched for any sign of mental illness in her daughter. My friend suffered from constant worry and guilt that her child would become ill. Her daughter is almost thirty now and she shows no sign of the disease. Even though the test may reveal an increased risk for certain conditions, it is not advanced enough to predict with certainty what my health picture will be in thirty years. I believe in knowing what family risk factors affect me and

Ozonoff first states early detection assessments can lead to false positive and negative reports. In this particular discussion, false positives would occur when a child is officially diagnosed and discovers, later in the years, was incorrect. False negative assessments occur when the initial diagnosis would find nothing, yet there was indeed a developmental problem. In regard to ethical concerns, false positives and negatives can carry legal ramifications. There is no specific dilemma on a federal level but more within each state.

Leighton sides with the consensus view that advocates pre-symptomatic and predisposition genetic testing for conditions that manifest in adulthood, lack treatment or are incurable should not

Pre-existing conditions are conditions that a person had prior to obtaining a health insurance policy. Pre-existing conditions include a variety of chronic conditions, such as obesity, high blood pressure, asthma, diabetes, etc., and acute or short-term conditions, such as pregnancies and accidental injuries (Henry Keiser, 2012). According to Families USA 2012 report “more than 64.8 million non-elderly Americans have been diagnosed with pre-existing conditions” (Families, 2012, p. 1).

Tarini BA, Goldenberg A, Singer D, Clark SJ, Butchart A, Davis MM. Not without my permission: parents’ willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research. Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(3):125-130.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, asthma is a disease that affects your lungs. It is a chronic lung disease that inflames and narrows the airways. The inflammation makes the airways swollen and very sensitive. The airways tend to react strongly to certain inhaled substances. When the airways react, the muscles around them tighten. This narrows the airways, causing less air to flow into the lungs. Asthma causes recurring periods of wheezing (a whistling sound when you breathe), chest tightness, shortness of breath, and coughing. The coughing often occurs at night or early in the morning. Asthma affects people of all ages, but it most often starts during childhood. In the United States, more than 25 million people are known to have asthma. About 7 million of these people are children. It is the most common long-term diseases of children. If a person has asthma, they’ll have it all the time; however, they will usually have asthma attacks only when something bothers their lungs, According to Center Disease Control and Prevention.

Parents who seek for a medical diagnosis that will explain the child’s developmental condition are pro-actively looking for a remedy

Approaches to the management of a child’s well-being have been influenced by our ever-changing society. In the past, the focus was on the examination for communicable or contagious diseases, but today a clinical care provider is mandated to appreciate the influence of social, economic, and demographic factors on a child’s development and a possible effect on his/her health (Burns et al, 2013). Although we have many assets that can help in assessing the biological function and well-being of pediatric patients, head to toe assessment with medical evaluation remain the most significant part of any health assessment (AAP, 2016). The initial focus of any healthcare providers assessment is the objective and subjective data of the patient. When the

Parents take action on results while the infant patient give off blood samples of experienced symptoms. Unfortunately, parents blame themselves for their offspring disadvantage, for instance, a five day old was diagnosed with a metabolic disorder and the mother thought the cause was from protein in her breast milk. That is to say, although the metabolic disorder wasn’t specified screenings bring much worry and uncertainty. The mother didn’t know where the defect stemmed from and much of the condition was very vague. Fales positive indication can lead to either a firm positive or firm negative. Patients in waiting must take preventative measures such as making the child miss out on sleep, or putting a stop to breast feeding. Additionally warning signs and symptoms are given to families and patients. Parents find these cases very shocking because birth is suppose to be a joyous occasion. Doctors give so little information on certain conditions from the lack of conclusions even when steps are taken that patients feel the need to take action on their own. For example a 3MCC patient symptoms was so moderate the practioner put a stop to dietary measures but the parent felt the need to continue testing’s and continued to take precautionary measures. “Families are sometimes left with no option but to know what can be done to ‘help’. Geneticists and families as a whole manufacture the social and biological

3: Promoting informed decision making is a valuable recommendation when sufficient evidence is available on analytical and clinical validity and risk and benefit analysis is favorable but not definitive. Furthermore, discourage the use of testing when there is no or little information on validity or utility and evidence of harm. These recommendations and rigorous outcomes research can provide sufficient guidance in clinical practice for assessing the impact of genomic testing on patients, their families, and population based health outcomes.

Lippman, Abby. "Prenatal and Genetic Testing: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequities." American Journal of Law and Medicine (n.d.): n. pag. Web. Nov. 2014. <http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/amlmed17&div=8&g_sent=1&collection=journals#23>.

Wertz and Fletcher have noted that most geneticists will do prenatal testing for anxious women, no matter their age or family history. This is because the women want it; they are not coerced like Lippman believes. Families have said, “the grieving process that began at the child’s birth continues throughout the child’s life” (Wertz and Fletcher 414). Prenatal testing does not remove freedom from a woman, it gives it to the entire family.

If a child gets a positive result for a serious disease, it might trigger stress, anxiety, or depression for a parent because you would be worried about the child’s health, and not all genetic tests are 100% accurate. Genetic testing can also be very expensive, ranging from under $100 to more than $2,000. Ethical issues are also a major drawback. If the parents attend a church and the church finds out somehow that the parents had their child genetically tested, the church might think that the parents are going against God and relying on science. Or maybe the parent’s coworkers, friends, or family begin to ignore them for doing something like that to the child. Even though these are some minor setbacks, as you can see, I feel that the good sort of out weighs the

Huntington 's chorea, commonly referred to as Huntington’s disease is an utterly devastating diagnosis for not only the patient affected directly with the disease but also for their biological children. Huntington’s disease is an inherited genetic disorder which causes the death of brain cells resulting in physical and mental abnormalities that worsen over time until certain death. As if that were not bad enough, the off spring of Huntington’s disease affected patients have a 50% chance of inheriting the gene. (Mayo Clinic, 2014) Genetic testing is the only way to diagnose this disease. (PubMed: Predictive testing, 1976) Testing positive for the gene presents moral and ethical dilemmas for those people.