Children Should Not Withhold Discipline From A Child

With discipline is all about reinforcing positive behaviors. One example can be to give out praises when a positive social behavior has been shown and encourage to continue the behavior. As the previous example that I used, if the parents had explained that it is not appropriate to hit or throw things at people. Then the child would have learned that what he did was wrong and would likely learn not to do it again if he is given an acceptable consequence to his behavior. When disciplining a child they must receive a consequence that is appropriate for his or her age.

Have you ever been spanked as a kid and felt angry towards your parents? Did you feel they just hated you? Spanking is a form of corporal punishment which is a punishment intended to cause pain in many different ways. Corporal punishment started in slavery and led to schools and homes. Although many states have banned corporal punishment it is still allowed in 19 out of 50 states. Many adults will agree children just need a ‘good ol’e spanking’ and others will argue that it is a negative way to parent and causes more problems. Spanking children is not a proper way of parenting because it gives a negative effect on children.

The main reason that parents use spanking as a discipline technique is because it is what they received when they were children. However, in many cases spanking has nothing to do with helping the child. It is used as a quick solution to stop negative behavior with no real regard for the long-term outcome. Parents often spank their children because they themselves are angry. These parents simply cannot handle a situation and take it out on their child. Spanking might be more accepted if it was the only, or the most successful, form of discipline, but it is not. Spanking is simply a short-term fix of a child 's discipline problems. Two of the widely used alternatives to spanking are the time-out and restriction punishments. Time-out is most effective when administered to children under ten years of age, and a restriction mostly benefits children over ten years old. Both of these methods, while effective, also have a positive influence on the child, they teach the child discipline without the use of force, help the child

When it comes to disciplining your children the question that continues to come up is, to spank or not to spank? The argument on whether or not to use physical punishment has been going on for decades. It’s still one of the biggest controversies and debates among parents and just about everyone has a strong and emotional opinion. One of the problems with spanking is how people define it. If you were to ask people what is spanking, each person would define it differently. Baumrind defined spanking as “striking the child on the buttocks or extremities with an open hand without inflicting physical injury, with the intent to modify behavior.” Spanking can make a negative or positive impact on a child’s life.

Spanking has been a controversial topic among many parents. Some believe it is just a form of discipline and is okay, while others believe that this is abuse or violence and it will harm the child in the long run.

Right off the top of my head I can proudly say that I believe in spanking a child for punishment when they are the right age. If a kid is disciplined too little they’ll think they can get away with anything throughout their home life and not respect you as their parent. If spanked too much the child will grow a fear to do anything that he or she thinks they are going to get in trouble for. So think for one moment, what would happen if you found a perfect balance of discipline for a child that would benefit both you and whoever the child might be. One important factor of the whole punishment concept is whether or not the child understands why they are receiving punishment for his or her actions. That’s why it’s important

WHACK! (Boo Hoo) “Oh daddy! No, please, not another one! I learned my lesson. “ I wailed. WHACK! “One more just to make sure you learned your lesson son.” my father irritatedly. Leading me to say Parents whose children promote violence toward society harms everyone around them because their children were never spanked at an early age. For example, I am a great student and most the time I make the right decision. At times I do not make the right decision I intend to learn from my mistakes. I was taught by the board of education and afterwards I understood what my mistake was.

Apart from corporal punishment, there are many tactics can be used to discipline children, such as reasoning. Spanking is not the only choice. In fact, spanking might to be good choice. Sarah Landy, child psychologist with Toronto's Hincks Institute who leads parenting courses for parents having children who are hard to be disciplined, reported that most parents told her that spanking was useless (qtd. in Bennett). Holly Bennett, Freelance editor, writer and researcher, gave a reasonable explanation, “Spanking tends to divert the child’s attention away from the original issue (his own behaviour) because it provokes such strong emotions -- fear, resentment, hostility.” As a result, through corporal punishment, parents might not be able to teach children anything, but leave their children painful

The side that is against spanking and physical punishment believe there are psychological effects behind this type of punishment. Many believe that it can lead to the child being an abuser both to their partner and child in the future. There is also a belief that the child will suffer from mental illness and develop issues with security and trust. This is due to the fact that someone that the child loves is hurting them, and they are not able to develop relationships that involve trust and security. Additionally, another reason people believe that spanking is wrong is that of it ill then teaches them it is okay to physically harm someone because they are learning this violent behavior. However, a good way to discipline a child without physically harming them would be to encourage positive behavior and use consequences like taking away privileges to control their

Spanking has become an arguably debatable form of discipline. According to a study at the University of Texas, the more children are spanked, the more likely they are to defy their parents (“Spanking: Pros and Cons”). There is a connection between spanking during the childhood and mental health diagnoses later in life. There are other options of discipling your child than spanking them, especially because all children can take spanking differently. Parents should not spank their child because it showers that being “stronger” is right, demonstrates that older people have a right to hit younger people, and gives the examples that violence solves all problems.

As a child I was spanked when I did something wrong. My parents never left a mark on me what so ever. Being spanked taught me respect and kept me in line. The way my parents disciplined me, I think is an accepted method of punishment. I believe what parents do to their kids at home

The second reason why spanking should not be done to children is the fact that it is a form of child abuse. At the moment, countries are divided as to legalize corporal punishment or create a law saying it is illegal. In the book written by Abela (2007) for the Council of Europe, she notes that “spanking of children less than two years old increases the risk of severe physical injury and the child is unlikely to understand the connection between behavior and punishment.” Most parents tend to go overboard when disciplining their children, especially when they are very angry and have not subdued their anger. This then makes the child their venting medium to get rid of that anger and sometimes, they do not apologize and even forget why they have done the deed. Other parents tend to make this a habit and even if the child did nothing wrong, they would still continue spanking the child. Eventually, the parents may slowly abuse the child through pain and totally make the child’s life a complete hell. As a result, child becomes frail and suffers psychological problems. Some countries, especially social services, use this as grounds to get the child away from the family and file cases of child abuse and physical injury that can lead to jail time if proven guilty. Spanking may also cause scarring and may be with the child

Corporal punishment or spanking does not only hurt physically but can lead to emotional and behavioral problems down the road for children. When parents spank children they are using the notion of fear to teach them what not to do, but it does not explain what is right when it comes to appropriate behaviors. In addition, children learn that when they

Spanking positively affects the behavior of an offspring. Parents and/or guardians should spank their children in order to discipline them . Being about corporal punishment, spanking is one of them. The purpose of it is to reinforce the behavior of the child. The argument of parents being able spank their child has been going on for decades, should it be considered as child abuse or is it negative physical contact.

Corporal punishment has been around since the Middle age like at school, home, and for when a person convicted a crime. Today, some schools have banned corporal punishment like in Alaska, California, Connecticut, Delaware, etc., because researcher has shown that corporal punishment can cause students more harm and paying less attention in school. What are others opinion about corporal punishment? One parent said,” They’d been spanked as a child, and they turned out “ pretty good” (Polhemus, Betsy, et al.Is spanking an effective punishment). Scott Morefield who is a blog editor for Raising Godly Children argues that,”That spanking and abuse are not synonymous and that corporal punishment has been used by parents throughout civilization. He also notes that support for physical discipline can be found in the Bible (Morefield, Scott. "Parents Should Have the Right to Properly Discipline their Children"). However, many disagree that using physical