Chimp War Research Paper

Despite a lack of scientific academic education, Jane Goodall’s work on the chimpanzees made revolutionary breakthrough in the field of understanding chimpanzee behavior. It was all made possible by her firm belief on her unconventional methods which academics in the field eyed with cynicism and felt was pointless. Such pessimistic outlook on her efforts from established academics did not blight her morale; instead she carried on with her methods of analyzing the chimpanzee population with full enthusiasm and self belief.

Goodall, J. (1971). In the Shadow of Man. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. The author’s goal in writing this book is to discuss her experiences and what she had learned from studying wild Chimpanzees. Goodall wrote this book in order to convey her knowledge of a species of animal she loves very much, so that others may become educated and join her in protecting them. She dreamed of going to Africa to see them, and was offered a job by Dr. Lewis Leakey. Goodall wanted nothing more than a chance to help. Her experiences in surrounding herself with them have completely changed the way scientists conduct field research. Whether she intended to or not, the data she has collected has debunked myths and uncovered truths about chimpanzees, while bringing more light to human behavior.

Within this essay, we will study more in depth the behavioral as well as physical traits of two primates at a zoo from their interaction with their peers to their place in the group. This observation would enable us to further understand the possible existing correlation between humans and primates. First, I studied a female chimpanzee with her baby, and then, a dominant male gorilla, in San Francisco Zoo at about noon, on May 23, 2015, for an hour each. Even though they share some similarities such as having a large brain, living for a long time, and being bored in their enclosure, they are still different; when gorillas are the largest, chimpanzees are the smartest. In fact, chimps use tools to catch food, they would not be able to reach

This book was about the life of apes in their natural habitat that is being destroyed. Stanford highly pushed the idea of extinction and what people are doing to the apes. Stanford explains the threats to the ape's survival and tells us ideas that could help stop or slow down the decline of the ape population. He tells us about the complex cultural, social, economic and

Isbell and Wright’s articles both focus on monkey species and their native environments, Africa for Isbell’s (1994) vervet Old World monkey and South America, Peru area, for Wright’s (1994) owl and titis monkeys. The articles main focus is the relationship between these monkeys and their natural predators. Focusing on how the predator aspect of their lives is determined by their environment and adaptations they make to ensure survival. Isbell’s Vervets Year of Doom focuses more on the adaptations that was forced upon the vervets’ because of their changing environment, the death of fever trees. While Wright’s Night Watch on the Amazon focusses more on how the primates way of life affects their relationship with predators and the likelihood of attacks. Both articles have similar aspects however the species way of life, specifically their environment and sleep schedule, are quite different as well as the authors way of observing and studying the primates within their habitats.

1. The social structure and behavior of chimps in their communities or troops suggest many questions. What research questions might Dr. Hahn and her associates ask?

Chimpanzees (Figure 1) are the closest living relatives to us, and they share 99 percent of our DNA (1). Chimpanzees have distinct group territoriality. Male chimpanzees “patrol” near the boundary between the two ranges, at that time they move very carefully and quietly, and they can cease to listen and observe the range of their neighbors. Patrolling individuals are likely to face cruel and violent

Humans and Bonobos Hi, I am going to tell you facts about the mysterious bonobo. Bonobos are more closely related to humans than any other species of animal in the world. They also have a similar shaped head to humans. Bonobos have a limited gene diversity due to poaching.

In all the american wars we, as people have worked hard, but there was more than just people on the battlefield. Animals ranging from as simple as dogs, to as strange as slugs have been said to be the key to saving soldiers lives.They have faced as much pain and suffering as soldiers have and we have put these animals in dangerous places because they were our only chance of survival. Lots of animals like, slugs, chickens, and canaries were used to detect poisonous gases. Dogs and pigeons have all been used as messengers. Even glow worms, dolphins, and sealions were apart of the military. Animals contributed their strength, sweat, and lives to winning the wars.

20th century is the most educated century but also the most violent over the history of mankind. The lethal violence has been increasing over the course of mammal evolution. The aggression in mammals, that includes humans, also has a genetic component with high heritability. So it is widely admitted that evolution has shaped human violence. And this violence is not among different species, it is among the same species. Of all the world species, humans and chimpanzees are some the only species that engage themselves in coordinated attacks on the other members of the same species. We, humans, are not the only ones that are involved in the homicides, massacres, terrorism, and human violence. Like humans, chimpanzees also engage in rape, murders, and violence. The patterns of violence that is found among the humans are compared and contrasted with the great ape species. Whether it is for food/resource sharing, dominance structure, territory or the male competition for sexual access to females. Both human and chimpanzee want to prove their status what becomes a reason for a great number of wars and aggressiveness (Wrangham and Peterson, 1996).

When the conch was destroyed, all sense of civilization and order was destroyed with it. “…the conch exploded into a thousand white fragments and ceased to exist…‘See? See? That’s what you’ll get! I meant that! There isn’t a tribe for you anymore! The conch is gone…’” (pg. 185).

Along time ago, in a city far far away… Two rival monkey cities were at war. The Gorillas, from Flint were fighting the Orangutans from Detroit. The war was clearly in control of the Gorillas, and they were threatening to force the Orangutans into extinction. Then along came a simple Orangutan, Marshall. Marshall was a simple Orangutan who no one really believed in. He wasn’t the smartest Orangutan, not the fastest, or the most popular. He was always picked last during Orangutan games. So when he stepped up, he shocked the world. The Gorilla army was surrounding the Orangutans. When all hope seemed lost and all of the leading Orangutans had given up hope, Marshall rose to the top. He took control of the Orangutans and lead them to a successful

To keep the position the alpha status he must build a coalition with others and get support from top ranked females within the group (Waal 2007, 29-32). It’s quite clear that chimps use strategic intelligent to stay top (Waal 2007, 180-197). Building alliances with other chimps is curial in chimp politics, it allows them to either stay in power or gain political power. This forms a competition, which chimps are good at it. Each chimp candidate must begin campaigning by getting alliances and building relationships to gain others support or “vote” for the alpha status (Waal 2007). This is done by grooming; this strategy is one of the primary ways of building an ally (Waal 2007). Grooming for them is a form reconciliation and it is our vision of political campaigning to keep or form alliances and relationships (Waal 2007, 115). The idea here is building your support team and appealing to your “voter”, yet chimps do this much more efficiently than a human candidate. Overall, the intentional thought is “You scratch my back, I scratch yours” (* lecture). This was seen among two chimps Nikkie and Yeroen in the alliance against Luit to gain alpha status known as

The part that always shocked me was the inter-community violence among the chimps: the patrols and the vicious attacks on strangers that lead to death. It’s an unfortunate parallel to human behavior – they have a dark side just as we do. We have less excuse because we can deliberate, so I believe only we are capable of true calculated evil (Jane Goodall).

From early childhood, I always identified as a gorilla. When people asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up, I proudly announced, "a gorilla!" But all the adults told me it couldn't happen, I was a boy not a gorilla. Thankfully, society today realizes that not all of us feel the way our bodies appear. So, with great pride, I would like to declare my self as a dominant male (or silverback) gorilla. Please excuse any violent outbursts or beatings that arise if you choose to ignore my territorial displays.