China, South Korea And Japan

It isn’t like this hasn’t happened before. In 1907 US I banks went bankrupt, Wall Street was cleaned up and subsequently the US became the 20th Century King of the Jungle. In 1966 almost all the financial companies went bankrupt in Japan, the Japanese then cleaned up the system and Japan became the world’s best growth economy for the next 20 years! In 1990s the Japanese propped up banks and, they did not let their banks fail, this led to the creation of zombie banks and major problems for Japan which still haunts it. The same happened in the 1970’s in the US and this was a lost decade for the US with high inflation rates and troubles galore. Even, the dot com burst, all this happened but the world did not end! When capitalism goes awry you can’t bring in socialism all of a sudden, bankruptcies teach the capitalists to respect the markets and accept their failures with humility. So, this current performance is just desperation as the US doesn’t have any bullets left after shooting in the dark.

Between the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, Japan’s economy developed remarkably. China had also developed economically; however, not near as much as Japan. The Japanese government industrialized greatly and encouraged western influence, but the Chinese government did the opposite.

The ROC has the 12th largest economy in the world and is the 3rd largest in Asia. After world WII the ROC was one of the poorest countries in Asia and its economy was designed solely to the needs of Japan. The ROC was also dependent on US aid. In 1962 a coup led by General Park Chung-hee started a series of ambitious economic development. This resulted in an economic shift to vastly more foreign trade normalizing their economic relations with Japan.

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE 1. Before the 1980's, China was facing a very serious issue. China had an uncontrolled population which was leading to minimal resources, overpopulation, minimal education, minimal healthcare, and many other issues. As a result of this issue, China implemented a one-child policy in the year of 1980.

The reasons are the following: Because of globalization all the markets are open and easier to enter for companies all over the world. This increases the entrance of foreign competitors like Chine, Italy, South Korea etc. Another factor are the energy and raw material costs that effect the profit of a company. Not to forget that the economy itself is really unstable. Last but not least the government regulation and laws that can increase the prices of the products as well.

The United States and Colombia have had a long standing relationship through the course of history. There have been trade agreements signed by the two parties; also negotiations have taken part in regard to development strategies on the part of the US to promote the rule of Democracy and it’s institutions in Colombia, where illegal armed forces sought to control many aspects of the country’s development. Aside from trade agreements the United States and Columbia have also had agreements related to the protection of the environment, renewable energy, control of chemical weapons, and so on. We are going to discuss these concepts in more detail throughout the paper to determine the socio-economic and political relations between the two countries, and try to create a perspective for the future of the relationship between them.

There had been a growing outcry from the public and leaders for something to be done to reduce the increasingly growing number of Japanese immigrants in the West Coast. Subsequent regulations placed on the Japanese in the United States made them aggravated. There was serious trouble brewing between the United States and Japan until the Japanese carried out attacks on Pearl Harbour in December 1941. After the attack on Pearl Harbor there was increased spread of propaganda from the press and local leaders against the people with Japanese roots. There were numerous calls to the Congress and President Roosevelt for removal of the Japanese from the Pacific Coast. On the 19th day of February 1942, President Roosevelt issued the Executive Order Number 9066 (Wheeler, Becker and Glover 244). The Executive Order authorized the evacuation of the Issei and Missei. About 120000 individuals of Japanese ancestry, both citizens and non-citizens were evacuated from the West Coast in what Lt. General John DeWitt said was compelled by “military necessity” (Wheeler, Becker and Glover 244). The most convincing and reliable evidence reveals that the removal and incarceration of Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbor did not meet the “clear and present danger” test. I do not agree with the Supreme Court’s decision.

The decade before World War II saw economic depression grip the most powerful nations on the world. The United States and Japan were no exceptions to this, with one major difference. As an island nation, Japan lacked the resources and raw materials necessary to expand its military and heavy industry, a popular strategy for ending depression and stimulating economic recovery and expansion. As such, Japan turned to military conquest and imperialism to gather the necessary resources. Standing in the way was an impediment long-seen as an obstacle to the Japanese military leadership – the United States. The oil embargo enacted under President Franklin Roosevelt, preventing Japan from receiving oil exports from its largest supplier, proved to be a tipping point that coalesced military strategy around the need to bring war to the American homeland. Along with its overly-ambitious military hopes in the quest to expand an empire recovering from economic depression and in dire need of resources and raw materials, the Japanese leaders underestimated the will of the Unites States and its allies in fighting a war against their aggression. Mistaking isolationist tendencies for “softness,” the Japanese failed to consider the rallying effect Pearl Harbor would have on the American spirit, ultimately catalyzing the transformation of the United States from an isolationist power to the protector of democracy around the world.

On the day of December 7,1941, a tragic event took place. And the name of it is Pearl Harbor, the surprise attack of the Japanese fleets on the U.S. city of Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. This takes place with two rivaling countries, Japan & the United States. This paper will give detail on this tragic event, and how it will end.

Globalization is far reaching in this day and age. Globalization is the worldwide flow of goods, services, money, people, information, and culture. It leads to a greater interdependence and mutual awareness among the people of the world (Tischler, 2011, 2007, p. 430). One non-Western culture that has been impacted by globalization is China. An example of the impact of globalization on China is their economy. Since joining the World Trade Organization, China has transformed from a culture that relied on economic self-sufficiency and shunned the thought of globalization to an economy that is progressively more open to trade and foreign investment.

Asia today is mostly associated with countries like China, Korea and Japan. Mongolia only comes up if one thinks deeply about the various countries in Asia. However, that could have been very different. The Yuan Dynasty of Mongolia, in the 13th and 14th centuries, was the largest empire in the world at the time, encompassing the entirety of Central Asia, parts of Arabia, the Caucasus and parts of Poland. However, when the Yuan Mongols attempted to take all of Asia, they were beaten back by the powers that had not yet fallen, such as Dai Viet, Champa and Japan. These military expeditions without fruition drained the Mongol treasury, eventually leading to internal strife that reduced the Mongols to an area roughly within

Like Athens and Sparta, were the United States and China drawn into a war neither power wanted because of their alliances?

Japan fit grow to 1.0 to 3.0 is based on the following situation. First, the Alliance, technically the alliance with United States. It seems that the japan gain power from the alliance. Japan tries to recover from the World War II, and starts to think and refine its role, “in the global community as a responsible stakeholder”. From 1945 to 1960. “Japan and the United States revised the security treaty to upgrade Japan's status in 1960”, and it has flourished during that time. From the 1970s to the end of 1980s, japan become a “systemic supporter”. From 1990 to 2005, Japan become an important part of United Nations and the international affairs to achieve the global peach. And the next period might continue to 2020, the end of Cold War with United States. In sum of the power of Japan refers to the author, Japan is acting world-wide scale, but to some extend its power is limited due to the defeat in World War II and the alliance with United States. These information provide a nice background to understand how Japan fit into the flat world, and the impacts will run through all the development. That is why the author says Japan has “a global ordinary power”. Japan should keep the relationship with America and at the same time improve some other power. In addition to that, Japan is experiencing the increasing competitive power from other Asian countries. “Japan should be robust in its global reach in terms of market access to resources, technological cooperation, and official development assistance”. The author also give some advices to cope with the global world based on the situation of Japan. Bi- Bi-Multilateralism, Aggressive Legalism, Sci-Tech Fundamentalism, Human

Globalisation has had a profound impact on the Japanese economy influencing levels of international trade, business operations, financial flows, government policy, labour markets and even environment. This movement has been driven primarily by numerous TNCs, trade liberalization, and the deregulation of the financial system, and numerous strategies adopted by the Government and Economy, resulting in the creation of a 'new' Japan.

Answer: The world economy has shifted dramatically over the past 30 years. We have been moving away from a world in which national economies were relatively self- contained entities, isolated from each other by barriers to cross- border trade and investments; by distance, time zones, and language; and by national differences in government regulation, culture, and business systems.