China vs. India: The Favorable Investment Destination

Since the start of the 20th century, with the fall of the Qing dynasty, when China was in shambles with no industry, a corrupt government and no international presence, all the way up until today, where China has evolved into one of the strongest internationally recognized countries with a highly globalized market, the relationship between the Chinese people and its government has been debated on whether or not Chinese society is one ruled and dominated by a central government or a society where social change occurred because of bottom-up forces leading to a government for the people. China, since 1949, has been a country, which has been run by a single party state, known as the CCP (Chinese Communist Party). The CCP is organized under the basis of a central, unchallenged party governing the people by the means of communism. Throughout the past century, the CCP has dictated and maintained a rule over the livelihood of its people by monopolizing Chinese politics and penalizing those who opposed it, through central command planning and on the other spectrum, radical economic reforms at the end of the 20th century in the interest of keeping the CCP in power.

China and India experienced similar economic effects and their reasons for going to war were somewhat the same. To start, in Doc 1 it states that “the economic development of India was stopped and the growth of new

India is one country which is developing rapidly at the moment along with China (Lal and Clement, 2005). The political, economic, social, cultural, technological and legal climate in India is extremely suitable for international entrepreneurs since business prospects in a country are heavily dependent on the above mentioned parameters. Since India is the second most heavily populated country in the world, British telecommunication company, Vodafone has enormous business opportunities in India. Mobile phone usage in India is increasing rapidly in recent times (Press Information Bureau: Government of India, 2010). A substantial portion of Indian

China and Russia had many similarities with communism and government, but they also had many differences that separated their thinking and beliefs. One of the most major differences was how long the rule of communism lasted in both of these countries. “China’s communism lasted but Soviet did not”(classroom.synonym.com). Over the decades political parties that want to change Russia have started to emerge. This wide list consists of “The Communism Party of the Russian Federation, The Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, Rodina, and United Russia” (indexmundi.com). Communism is shown in some sort of way with each of these parties. On the other hand, in china there is only one party that is allowed to run for office, and that party is the Chinese Communism Party. This party runs over “eight nominally independent small parties”

Globalisation has also been a resulting factor for the dramatic increase in technology. Bangalore, in the Silicon Valley of India is experiencing a remarkable IT boom, that is transforming the prospects of India’s economy. The internet is the fastest growing tool of communications. It took just 4 years for the internet to reach 50 million years, in contrast to the

Briefly compare the political regime type in China and India. Which of the two would you prefer to do business in and why?

On the other hand, India has spent a majority of its history as a colony of England. It was not until 1947 that India became an independent nation state, after a grassroots nationalist movement started by Gandhi, and even then they were a one party congress. They are also an interesting case of democracy because of how many unfavorable aspects towards it they had, such as high inequality, many peasants, and many different languages and religions (Lecture). In 1956, India was broken up into states by the States Reorganization Act, that made state lines based on linguistic group. India’s founding leaders mirrored the ideas of America, in balancing states rights with a central government (Sil, 2014). They have also more recently gone through a liberalization of their economy. India is unique in the way that their social hierarchy is constructed because of the fact that they have a caste system. The caste system is a combination of religious practice and community organization that is a part of Hinduism (Sil, 2014). This system was officially demolished in the country, but in the country it is still very prevalent, and the focus on helping those who were in lower castes succeed has made people more aware of the way they institute social policies.

The two countries that we are going to compare are India and China. The greatest contrast among Indian China is the level of development in both nations. Advancement can be seeing more in India than in China and the struck me the most. There could be many variables causing this distinction. To begin with, let 's examine the differences in the government of meat country. Since the meaning of time, the Chinese government is continuing to do things their way heavily influencing what happens in the country. They have inumerous laws that directly or indirectly cause a standstill with innovation. The majority of the things our state possessed in China bus to begin something intends to first get every one of the clearances from the government, which is extremely troublesome. Conversely, Indian government advances development by

Q6. India is a large and prosperous nation in Asia, they are also a nation of which who has the largest and most influential democracy. India prospers and thrives when it comes to their political and economic stances. Previously, we had learned the India was the jewel in the crown for the country of England. England had obtained control over India for a long period of time making India one of their best and most profitable colonies. Therefore, their political and economic success would be very crucial when it comes to the future of democracy in Asia. During this time in the world, democracy and communism were battling, trying to prove which one was better. The Soviet Union along with the East argued that communism was the way to go; on the

7. What lessons can each company draw from its India experience as it contemplates entry into other big emerging markets?

One of the former Prime Minister of Great Britain Winston Churchill said : “Democracy is the worst form of government except for all those others that have been tried.” May be he should have seen modern Chinese communism to moderate this passionate rhetoric. If we try to contrast two opposite governmental models like those of the USA and China, we will see that differences between them are not so obvious, as they might seem. American electoral democracy and Chinese communism are different in terms of legitimacy, self-correction and way to power.

The government of china is very keen to encourage foreign investors, because foreign companies are regarded as relatively good corporate

The Doing Business database ranks China a modest 91st on the overall ease of doing business, with India worse but not dramatically so at 116th… in China it’s quicker to start a business, get goods from factory floor on board a container ship, and register property. But Indians - perhaps surprisingly - seem to have more flexible labour laws and fewer hassles with licences.

According to the report released by IESA (Indian Electronics & Semiconductor Association) it is quite striking that the electronics product market in India is set to grow from $44 billion to $64 billion yet we still heavily rely on imports for the top 4 components needed to manufacture a smartphone (Memory, Display Units & Glass, SoC & Camera). Adding to the above India itself has no base/factory for manufacture of SoC’s (System on Chip).

India is the biggest democracy in the world, with a government type of federal republic. The country’s form of government mimics the United States with its federal structure. The federal government consists of executive, legislative, and judicial branches. In addition, India has adopted the a British style parliamentary system that allows for it its central government to have great power in relation to its states, according to US Department of State- Background Notes website (The Office of Electronic