Chinese Government Administration Of Coal Mine Safety Essay

This also means that our political leaders that should be concerned about the effects of regulation. In my opinion, there advantages and disadvantages to regulation. The advantages are the Government should be regulating certain things to make life safer and to make America stronger, and better place to live. The disadvantages are, the government should be regulating with more common sense. What I'm saying is the government should consider the costs and the benefits of what they're regulating. Unfortunately, if the Government does not, Americans run the risk of some kind of regulation that can't be explained by anyone except a bunch of lawyers which is going to cost the taxpayers more

Improved air quality wasn’t a subject of national concern until the mid 1900s. After decades of coal burning, unregulated gas emissions from cars and the excessive burning of fossil fuels, people started noticing bad air quality as a hazard to their lives. Over several decades, after seeing the costly effects air pollution was having on the environment and people’s health, interest groups like the Friends of The Earth club and the influences of Theodore Roosevelt and Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring finally came together to persuade the government to enforce legislation that would reduce air pollution. Because of these efforts, the policies of the Clean Air Act of 1963 and the Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Act of 1965, that aimed to control air pollution and raise air quality standards, helped create the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on December 2, 1970. Since then, the EPA has passed more air quality improvement acts, and amendments to previous acts passed, to increase restrictions on air pollutants, with their main policy concern being the Clean Air Act. Improved air quality acts imposed by the EPA have been successful in cleaning the United States’ air quality by reducing ground-level ozone pollution and reducing emissions, allowing for a decrease in pollution related deaths/illnesses and a better standard of living. The EPA, through regulations and the Clean Air Act, has delivered it’s promise to improve air quality in the United States.

The world is a stage, and we are all victims to the puppeteer. Especially in the United States, a country with a seemingly omnipotent central government, our actions within the economy are suspect to some form of regulation; whether that be governmental, or imposed by other private forces. The news articles titled, Faith in an Unregulated Free Market? Don’t Fall For it, and I paid $2500 for a Hamilton ticket and I’m Happy About it, display the benefits of what it is like to have a regulated economic market. On the contrast, the articles titled, Over-regulated America, and Regulation-Tangled, portray an economic system with an overwhelming presence of market regulation, that works in conjunction with the article, Presidents Have Less Power Over

The industrial revolution in the 1800s enhanced the lives of the American citizens. No longer were cultivation and farming a chief concern; instead, manufacturing and machinery were the major improvements of that time. Still today, big corporations are looking for the next big thing that could aid citizens in their everyday lives. What is often ignored, however, are the environmental factors that are being affected by the decisions made by these industries. Harmful acid rain, smog, and buried nuclear wastes diseased the Northern continent where some places were deemed uninhabitable to the public because of the threatening health risks. Environmental laws and agencies were then created in the 1970s to shift the impact that corporations have on the environment. The unchecked power that big corporations have exhausted has enhanced the decline of environmental stability and initiated many territorial restrictions due to the careless actions of the company.

First of all, every economic sector that was subject to economic regulation before 1975, has undergone significant changes in the nature and extent of regulation. These changes had profound effects on the structure of industries, price levels, costs and productivity. The industries in which changes occurred in economic regulations are the carriers, heavy transport, public transport, railways, telecommunications, production and transportation of natural gas, cable television, banking and financial services , electricity and property insurance and liability. These industries vary in structure, behavior, nature of regulation, and distribution of responsibilities between federal and state regulatory authorities. There are also wide variations in the major reasons, causes, and consequences of regulatory changes in these industries.

After numerous complaints from citizens about the overwhelming pollution in the United States, Congress decided to pass both the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act in order to protect America’s environment and its citizens. Through the tight restrictions placed on businesses in these acts, Congress hoped that the pollution put out by large industries would decrease and its affect on the lives of everyone in the United States would lessen. Under the Clean Air Act, cities, businesses, and automobiles must meet air quality standards and follow provisions created by the Environmental Protection Agency. Under the Clean Water Act, businesses must have licenses to release certain pollutants and national water quality standards must be met. The Clean Air and Water Acts are extremely effective, therefore, it was necessary the government create them. These acts have helped drastically decrease the pollution in America and have improved the health of citizens as well as the environment.

Regulation is a major activity at all levels of government. As society becomes more complex, regulations must grow and evolved to meet the demands of a developing society. Concentrating more on the role of regulation, it can be noted that it is a system that helps protect individuals from one another. So from buyers to sellers; from employee to employer; tenants to landlords, and so on. Regulations is also implemented to alleviate human suffering and promote overall welfare. For instance, aid in the form of Social Security and to Veterans, natural disaster relief, regulation of pollution and toxins, as well as temporary assistance for the unemployed. Last, and most importantly regulation is implemented to minimize and eliminate corruption and abuse of power by government agencies or officials. (Book Source) Taking into account the terms and ideologies stated above, it is easily understood why, we as individuals have decided for so many years, to abide by this social contract with our government. We gain the most benefit from this quid pro quo relationship.

Although rarely discussed and unknown, the clean air act of 1970 and its amendments has helped the United States and its people greatly in the past 40-plus years. The act was originally created to regulate 6 criteria pollutants: lead, carbon monoxide, ozone, sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, and nitrogen dioxide. Then, the Clean Air Act amendments of 1990 expanded on these by targeting four other areas: acid rain, urban air pollution, toxic air emissions, and ozone depletion. The United States government enforced these regulations for factories, coal plants and automobiles to not only address air concerns, but address health concerns and environmental concerns.

a hundred and one). Moreover, rulemaking is likewise described as “critical to the definition and implementation of public policy inside the US”. It includes enforcing corporation’s obligation to specify guidelines and regulations that will help to guide the laws operation. Those regulations and rules are, by using definition, policies which is an ongoing process where rules may be added, deleted, or modified over its lifetime. Rulemaking, not legislation, constitutes the majority of the policies that regulate and shape society. For example, how public benefits are accessed and dispersed, how facts are gathered and made public, job creation, and most trade

As carbon dioxide and pollution slowly kills both the people and the environment, the United States government begins to discard many of the regulations meant to protect us, so companies can make a few bucks.

divergent views of government regulations. One view is on the public benefit, the other is on

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created to improve human health through ensuring a safe environment. One of the EPA’s main priorities is to develop and enforce regulations (Adler). The regulations put into place are mandatory requirements that must be obeyed. Regulations can apply to anything, including businesses, state or local governments, private institutions, or individuals (“Regulations”). Even though the EPA serves to help humans by protecting the environment, it can also harm humans. The damages done to our economic lifestyles are getting worse as the EPA gains more power. Because the EPA is the only regulatory agency for the environment, they can make the rules as strict as they want. This can be problematic for

Air pollution and its effects on health for various populations reflect the economic burden that emerges from these industries. Regulatory interventions intended to improve the health status must be tailored to meet the specific needs of the industry and populations being affected. This may be in the form of legislation that prohibits the use of certain fuels, policies that set limits on emissions, incentives that promote public transportation and recycling, investment in cleaner technologies, or subsidies to improve existing industries. Regulations can be in the form of taxes, fees, or penalties on industry or contracting with outside organizations to provide services or education. Each type of intervention targets a specific cause of pollution

In order to increase confidence in the government’s regulatory role in the economy, efforts should be made to: simplify government regulations and inspections; systematize and unify the work of inspection agencies and the procedures for conducting inspections; publicize clear and understandable information on inspections and the rights and duties of inspection agencies, and make taxation bodies liable for unfounded verifications, or establish an agency that registers inspections and limits the number of inspections. Many businessmen believe this would discourage frequent inspections.

Every economy needs regulations to a certain extent, but how much is too much, and how exactly do regulations even affect the economy of the country? Those are key questions that many are asking, and don’t truly have answers for.