Chiquita Banana Essay

What role did the individual or group play in taking this case to court? What/ who encouraged them?

The con revolved around the law firm settling numerous lawsuits and that the plaintiffs wanted

The alternative crop programs the US proposed to replace coca failed for various reasons. The unstable political situation made the area too dangerous to bring in “agronomists, engineers, and project specialists” to survey the land (Kirk 265). Even if farmers had been successful in growing alternative crops, the Colombian market for legal crops such as corn, yucca, coffee and chocolate was already “battered by global shifts in price.”(Kirk 264) Legal crops had to be transported on poor roads and farmers had to wait months to be paid for their goods. These were no competition for coca which was paid for immediately, often times with American cash, and transported without any charge to the farmers (Kirk 243).

For my weekly journal, I decided to talk about Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. This act was established in 1970 by the congress to prevent organized crime in the United States. One of the cases that I found online talks about two companies Allstate Insurance Company and Providence chiropractic office. Providence Chiropractic violated the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act so Allstate Insurance Company decided to sue them. Allstate Company accused them for misrepresenting medical records to lift insurance claims. The owner submitted false bills looking for installment for treatment that was never provided. Allstate claims that the three women that were involved in this crime intentionally and

years of leading Sunbeam successfully out of a slump that had threatened the long-term viability

With the case finally behind me I could finally focus on what really mattered, laundering money through Caribbean bank accounts for The Columbians. The Columbians were what you might call commodity traders. I simply deposited large amounts of greenbacks in the account for a company named Enterprise International, but before that I would send the money through a trail of different other accounts. What can I say, my clients value their privacy above all else.

The major conflict in Colombia is the civil war with insurgent groups, as time went the conflict worsens and new issues were added a result to the civil war in Colombian such as drug traffic, paramilitaries, common crime, poverty, and unemployment. However, the civil war in Colombia affects directly the U.S government interest; as a consequence, that, the insurgent groups in Colombia have as a major financial resource the drug traffic. Therefore, the high position of Colombia in the global production of cocaine and heroin has long been a U.S major concern to its national interest, since U.S has been one of the most cocaine consumers, affecting most of youth population and enriching the Colombian’s illicit groups.

Correa’s tight control over the courts meant that the case was lost from the start. Indeed, there was abundant and clear cut evidence of judicial tampering and corruption and so it was no surprise when the judge agreed with Correa’s demands, although “only” awarded $40 million dollars (Still a sum that would bankrupt the newspaper). The directors however, weren’t so lucky and were sentenced to 3 years in

The reasoning behind this is the belief that the money Chiquita paid was indeed used in hurting those people. The victims and their families have right to demand justice. The question remains, of who actually should be brought to justice.

Chiquita Brands International seems to have an autocratic leadership style locally but laissez-faire at headquarter level. In the 1960s, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) and National Liberation Army (ELN) was founded and this cause guerrilla warfare. The FARC was against “the United States influences in Colombia, neoimperialism, monopolization of natural resources by multinational corporations, and paramilitary/government violence” (Schotter & Teagarden, 2010). They was aware of problems involving “farm workers labored long hours in dangerous conditions, agrochemical runoff contaminated water, and tropical forests were cleared for expansion” (Schotter & Teagarden, 2010). Furthermore, the drug cartels were within the country and providing illegal drug trades; which is when the United States backed the War on Drugs. Somewhere between late 1980’s and beginning of 1990’s, Chiquita paid “taxes” to the illegal drug trade while hoping to keep employees safe. No changes were made until 1992 when Dave McLaughlin, Managing Director and

According to Milton Friedman social responsibility of business was to increase profits to stay within the rule of the game specifically avoiding deception and fraud. He argued that only individuals have social responsibility to increase profits and corporation is an artificial person (Milton Friedman, p.1) in the sense may have artificial responsibility but business as a whole cannot have responsibility (System not individual). A good corporation in Friedman’s view is not one that attempts activities only because they are ethically good, but because they are economically good.

Alcoa is subject to various lawsuits and legal disputes in due course of its business

After the public inquiry, Peter Fraser, who was the Lord Advocate at the time, decided in July 1991, that “there was insufficient evidence to convict the companies and individuals in a criminal court” (Gavin Cleland). Occidental was never prosecuted.

The Shareholder approach to managerial responsibility was highlighted in Milton Friedman’s New York Times article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits”. In essence, that article states that the responsibility of a manager is solely to the shareholders; he or she must follow the shareholders’ interests as long as it stays within legal and certain social parameters. In this essay, I will further explain Friedman’s arguments, address main counterpoints, and ultimately argue that Friedman’s conclusion is a correct and normative view of the moral responsibility from the perspective of management in a non-private company.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR), has been the centre of debate since the last decade, with the increase in technology and globalization, company policies have come under a lot of scrutiny. Although this issue is not relatively new but with the hype of increasing media coverage and in the wake of high profile corporate scandals (Enron, WorldCom) the emphasis has mounted (Huczynski and Buchanan, 2013). Organizations play a vital and ever so increasing role in the lives of people, other organizations and the wider community in general (Mullins, 2013). Hence it is the responsibility of these organizations to act in such a manner that accommodates the wider society. In 1970, economist Milton Friedman once argued “the business of business