Choicepoint

The purpose of this qualitative study is to identify the IT leaders who have successfully implemented security policies and procedures. Using the quantitative methodology would not be appropriate because the collected data will not be in the form of numbers and/or statistical results, and the statistical findings will not generalize the real-world problem that needs to be resolved. (Creswell, 2014). Quantitative methods are used mainly to find out the who, what, when and where and the results numerical descriptions provide where the researcher needs more of a detailed narrative (Sutton, & Austin, 2015)

Without an Internal Audit Group to shepherd the IT's activities and guarantee that they stay agreeable with the security administration systems to which the association has submitted, the presentation of danger could be intemperate and a genuine risk to the fruitful operation of the association. The Audit's presentation and Compliance Framework denote a noteworthy change in the Office's audit hones. Further, it reasoned that the presentation of the graduated danger based methodology has met global principles and speak to best work on, bringing about a viable and effective audit

and the parent system and CEO on federal, criminal charges regarding violations of the Medicare Anti-Kickback Act in connection with recruitment of healthcare providers. The consciousness has definitely been raised among corporate CEOs and CFOs to insure the integrity of the firm and all its affiliates (Levine & Short,

In the case of Blanton v Newton Associates, Inc., Blanton’s was clearly harassed. In cases such as this, the employer (Newton) would find their best defense in the cases of Burlington Industustries, Inc. v Ellerth, 118 S. Ct. 2257 (1998), and Faragher v City of Boca Raton, 118 S. Ct. 2257 (1998).

To understand the role(s) of a Security Manager, a person must know what security is and what it means to an organization. According to Ortmeier, “security may be defined as a public or private service-related activity that provides personnel, equipment, and creates policies and procedures designed to prevent or reduce losses. These losses, caused by criminal action as well as by noncriminal events resulting from human error, emergencies, man-made and natural disasters, and business intelligence collection by competitors”. (2009).

Discrimination can come in many shapes, forms, and actions in the operation of business in today’s global marketplace. Many laws and regulations have been implemented in an attempt to protect workers from any type of intentional workplace discrimination. However, there are still companies which operate outside of these regulations and must face the repercussions for their actions. Presented is an analysis of one such organization in the case of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) vs. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.

A contract has been awarded under competitive negotiated procedures and an unsuccessful offeror wanted to know why they were not the winner. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provides an approach to this issue by offering an organized correspondence with the unsuccessful offeror and the government. An unsuccessful offeror may submit a request to the contracting officer for clarification on why they did not win the award. This request is called a debriefing. The debriefing provides feedback from the government on the unsuccessful offeror’s proposal explaining the process in depth as to why they were not selected. Only certain information is shared and will vary depending on whether the debriefing is conducted prior to or after

Opposite to what some might believe, according to BOA’s Smith, “senior management is not the biggest hindrance to better security. Rather, the middle management might represent one of the largest challenges because they impact the organization daily.” Many organizations find it difficult to stay in compliance with different government laws and regulations like Sarbanes-Oxley Act and HIPAA in addition to Payment card industry Data security Standards. It does not help the fact that there is a scarcity in security professionals who have the technical and engineering skills that know how to explain the risks/rewards and the trade-off and can sell solutions within the organization.

Case two: Darleen Druyun accepted the vice president position offered by Michael Sears once the Boeing discovered the illegal job offer the company fired Sears and Druyun, both were sentenced to prison terms four months for Sears and nine months for Druyun. Based on the action of Boeing, investigators have covertly been placed in the procurement offices at the Pentagon and the head of the government contracts Stuart B. Nibley states that these illegal practices have brought about the reexamining of the rules and regulations which govern ethics and procedures so that these incidents will never occur again (Pae,

The Main Purpose of Security Management and Security Measures must be Commensurate with the Threat

Zenefits is a start-up company that began in 2013, founded by its CEO at the time, Parker Conrad6. The company provided a software to help companies manage their human resources tasks, like sign employees up for health benefits and health insurance4. The company, particularly Conrad, was focused on growth and revenue accumulation – to the point where they oversold the company’s revenue expectations to investors to gain funding2. The company’s hubris ultimately was its downfall, because in the attempt to meet their projected goals, Zenefits bypassed steps that are instrumental in making a company successful – including fixing mistakes, enforcing rules, complying with regulations, and efficiently managing employees2. Because Zenefits

By the end of 2004, ChoicePoint was running a business in the personal data industry with almost $920 million annual revenues. Beside Acxiom and Lexis-Nexis, ChoicePoint was either first or second in that industry. Although ChoicePoint 's focus was on securing the data, the collected consumers ' personal information, and control the access of companies and individuals to it, ChoicePoint was not hiring any Information Security Management standard which can lead to the weaknesses in ChoicePoint 's Information Security Management practices.

Citizen’s Ethical Issues: Citizens need to be very concerned about so much personal information being gathered in one place. Part of any person’s development through their life is learning from their mistakes so they will not repeat them in the future. However, if a person’s whole history of legal, credit, and driving mistakes are recorded and made available to anyone willing to pay, it can be impossible for someone to escape the mistakes of their past. Citizens should also be concerned about their personal information falling into the hands of identity thieves. When a company like Choicepoint has all their data, individuals have no control over who gets their hands on the data and must rely solely on Choicepoint’s discretion to keep the data in legitimate hands, which it has shown it can not be trusted to do through numerous security breaches (Otto, Anton, Baumer, 2007). Individuals also need to be concerned about Choicepoint supplying

20. who should lead the security team? should the approach to security be more managerial or technical?

Security plays a major role in both the business and government worlds. We will discuss the legal aspects of organizational security management. Discuss both the positive and negative influences regarding organizational security. We will also be discussing what consequences will both business and government operations have to overcome if they fail to achieve security goals and objectives. The value private security management brings to businesses will also be discussed.