Choosing Unhampered Market Process

The Gold Standard was the framework by which the value of cash was characterized in terms of gold, for which the money could be traded. The Gold Standard ended up being deserted in the Depression of the 1930s. Friedman felt that,“The gold standard is not feasible because the mythology and beliefs required to make it effective do not exist. This conclusion is supported not only by the general historical evidence referred to but also by the specific experience of the United States” ( “The Gold Standard:Please Stop”).Economists who contradict the Gold Standard may perceive what must be accomplished with a specific end goal to make a centrally controlled paper standard better than a decentralized Gold Standard. Milton Friedman poses the key question: "How can we establish a monetary system that is stable, free from irresponsible tinkering, and

There are only a few ways to increase production, which include hire more workers, increase hours, buy more equipment, and take advantage of technology to produce more. The government must form a way that the economy doesn’t grow too slow or fast so they can prevent disastrous events. The importance of modern currency lies in its purchasing power. Inflation signals the rising prices, but the way to think about it isn’t like that, but that the currency’s purchasing power decreases. With hyperinflation, fixed loans are impossible because nobody wants to risk it when the money can potentially become worthless. With moderate inflation, it can destroy wealth if it isn’t managed properly. Inflation is good for those who owe debt, but bad for those who lend money. Inflation may be bad, but deflation is worse. Prices fall because the economy is broken, but now the economy is broken because the prices have fallen.

Money is the crux of society. Without it, anarchy would break out. Bargaining would fail as people would claim the trade wasn’t fair, thievery would explode across the globe, lazy people would do nothing, and people wouldn’t have motivation to do anything but help their own family and selves. Yet, while everyone knows money is important, is ALL money important? For centuries, the penny has been part of American currency. And back in the day, it served a great purpose. Pennies could buy candies, breads, and many other things all on their own. But as time has changed, so has the value of the penny. As costs went up, the value of the penny went down. And with its lesser value, some people wonder if it’s even worth it to keep the penny around. But the answer to that little puzzle is as easily seen as a jigsaw meant for four years olds is put together. The penny must be kept.

(1) Explain what the Stable-Monetary-Unit Assumption is (10 points) and (2) provide an example of its application. (10 points)

Years ago, bank used to create money only if they have the real gold with them or someone deposits the gold to bank. But this is not how the bank operates today. Nowadays, banks create money as long as we, as individuals, borrow it and give the promise to return that money back. So, today, money is backed by the loan or mortgage. However, bank loans money that does not exist. Furthermore, as soon as people realize that bank creates money out of

advances the wellbeing and soundness of individual money related organizations and screens their effect on the monetary framework in general;

After World War II, the Bretton Woods Agreement established the gold standard and two support institutions called the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. This would lead to a shift, away from the gold standard, to more relaxed systems. The idea of currency purely backed by gold was slowly being shifted to a trust based currency. These institutions purpose was to regulate the economies by injecting or taking money in a process called sterilization. Sterilization is to protect certain countries from a going bankrupt. If a country goes bankrupt, it chain a chain reaction of bankruptcies. So, in order to maintain balance, currencies need to be stable enough, so that it can be in debt without having to declare bankruptcy. The idea is

Even though it can be seen that the problem lies in the fact that there is just not enough money to go around, the cause is rooted much deeper. It can all be traced back to the amount of money the government actually receives as revenue. The government is just a big business and the way it makes money is taxing the people that it governs over. The government just doesn’t have any other way of making money.

The primitive monetary instruments had a profoundly dynamic assistant nature, had no inborn quality. Their operation did not suggest the utilization of any particular item, but rather just the reference to a theoretical money related unit. Regardless of the possibility that the unique money related unit were symbolized by a given particular stock, this stock never took an interest in the operations, since what was implied was to make a conceptual reference to its worth, and not to trade different merchandise for it. Hence, currency was not, subsequently, created by a flash of brilliance, but rather originated from a need, and its development has reflected, at every time, the readiness of man to orchestrate its currency features to the reality of its economy. Perhaps even more importantly, invention of currency was the mother step in a new monetary system that has led to the birth of electronic banking and credit cards. To infer, pretty much as human advancement from viciousness to development has relied on upon the invention of currency, future advancement will rely on another definition and utilization of

Failure to implement homeowner relief programs would yield results that far exceeded local and state boundaries creating a nationwide catastrophe. As it is with the wide array of relief programs that “30% of those who qualified for relief have defaulted again” (ElBoghdady, 2014). Now, imagine the level of defaults if such programs did not exist. The lasting impacts of such programs could do wonders for the borrowers receiving help from the modifications or aid associated with the aforementioned relief programs. However, this would be less than desirable from an investor position who contributed to or agreed to offer relief in various forms. The unknown variables in the housing market could fall and result in the borrowers being upside again. Further affecting the banks with undervalued assets could result in a loss of investor confidence and face a collapse similar to that of Lehman Brothers. Although Lehman Brothers had other contributing factors to their collapse, contributory actions in the collapse was a result of bad mortgages and lack of investment to sustain its debts and operating expenses. Not having programs such as these could result in large investment firms either going out of business or the government deciding to use tax-payer dollars to bail-out the investment banks. Either way this depreciates property value and reduces income. The second and third order affects associated with reduced income and plummeting property values will directly affect consumer spending. This absence of consumer spending will create a ripple effect that could result in less supply and demand and increase unemployment. All of which could put the country into a depression that it may not be able to get out

For as long as money has existed, governments have sought to control its supply for their own benefit. The ancient Romans, for instance, regularly debased their coins so that, by the end of the 3rd century AD, the actual content of silver had declined to less than 5% purity. The debasement of and inflation of the money supply has historically been a tool of governments to expand their power. In conventional economics, which this paper will assume as a positive background in defending the feasibility of a sound money amendment, the result is a redistribution of real wealth from savers to the government, the banking and finance system, and other

Historically, money in the form of currency has predominated. Usually (gold or silver) coins of intrinsic value commensurate with the monetary unit (commodity money), have been the norm. By contrast,

A: All societies have some form of money because it makes economic transactions much more convenient and efficient. The purpose of money can be simplified into two main concepts including unit of account and store of value. Money serves as a unit of account which means

In Friedman’s monetarist construct of money has two side that is highly active. One of the side is money is being the cause of all failures and asymmetries in the economy (in the short term). The other side is neutral which money is influencing only the price level (in the long term). The nominal quantity of money is determined by its supply. On the other hand, the real volume of the money stock is expressed in the amount of goods and services that can be acquired for a given nominal amount of money and is conditioned by the demand for money, which is directly related to the price level.

1. The gold standard and the money supply. Under the gold standard all national governments promised to follow the “rules of the game”. This meant defending a fixed exchange rate. What did this promise imply about a country’s money supply? A country’s money supply was limited to the amount of gold held by its central bank or treasury. For example, if a country had 1,000,000 ounces of gold and its fixed rate of exchange was 100 local currency units per ounce of gold, that country could have 100,000,000 local currency units outstanding. Any change in its holdings of