Christian Beliefs On Gay Marriage Essay

The way people ultimately view homosexuality, whether in religion, politics or modern popular culture, is all determined by traditional or changing points of view. This essay will discuss mainly liberal and conservative Christian interpretations of the Bible, including many verses that may support or condemn homosexuality. It will also discuss the political views and laws against same-sex marriage and the social activism in the homosexual community. This is all about view points and it has many conflicting views and arguments.

The Baker Vs. LGBTQ Discriminating actions have become more prevalent now than ever before in American society. A same sex couple, David Mullins and Charlie Craig, wanted a costume cake to be made for their wedding day, but the baker, Jack Phillips, refused to make them one because of his Christian faith. In the four articles, “Supreme Court hears same-sex marriage cake case” by Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter, “A free-speech challenge, with icing” by The Washington Times, “Drawing a Line in the ‘Gay Wedding Cake’ Case” by The New York Times, and “Justices Sharply Divided in Gay Rights Case” by Adam Liptak, have described this issue of discrimination. Society's opinions are sided with both, the baker and the couple, but the baker

On June 26, 2015, the US Supreme Court ruled that the US Constitution guarantees the right for same-sex couples to marry. Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy stated in the majority opinion: "The court now holds that same-sex couples may exercise the fundamental right to marry. No longer may this liberty be denied to them." Many conservatives are completely against gay marriage and they have stated that they will fight to have the Supreme Court ruling overturned.

There have been many cases over the years regarding people objecting to things based on their religious beliefs. By doing so, these people are sometimes in violation of federal or state laws that protect people’s rights and prevent discrimination. An example of this is when Bob Smith refused to rent out his banquet hall to Adam and Steve, a gay couple who wanted to get married there. Bob, a California resident, refused to rent out the banquet hall because Adam and Steve’s gay wedding went against his religious beliefs and he found their lifestyle to be immoral and ungodly. This case brings up several legal, moral and philosophical issues that will be discussed in the following paragraphs.

The baker did not give a rejection on the basis of the Charging party's sexual orientation but, on his own religious beliefs. He refused because, "creating cakes for same-sex marriages would go against his...belief...taught in the bible" (McIntyre). His refusal to not make the cake for the same-sex couple is backed by the "First Amendment's guarantees of free speech and free religion exercise" which "he says prohibit Colorado from compelling him to make cakes that violate his conscience" (S.M.). He does not only exclude same-sex couple wedding

Businesses should have the liberty to publicly practice their religion without the hindrances from law and regulations. An article by Jacob Gershman and Tamara Audi in The Wall Street Journal, reports the case of a Denver-area baker, Jack Phillips, who was taken to appeals court on his rights to refuse service to a same-sex couple. A refusal that had no intentions of discriminating, but only to protect Phillips religious practices. In 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins were in search for a cake to celebrate their planned wedding and found themselves at “Masterpiece Cakeshop” in Lakewood, Colorado. Phillips politely declined his service with the justification of religion, stating simply that the decoration of the cake would be a celebration

She argues that “framing gay marriage as a religious right suggests that the parties who are harmed by marriage laws discriminating against same-sex couples include not only the individual men and women in these relationships but also the churches who support gay marriage and their members, regardless of their sexual orientation”. Even though DeLaet wrote this before the Supreme Court ruling, her argument can still be applied to the rights that gays and lesbians face in society today. The LGTB community is still striving to find acceptance among business owners who discriminate against them because of their sexual orientation. These business owners cite the First Amendment and their right to express their religion freely and use it as a scapegoat to refuse service to homosexuals. However, with DeLaet’s argument, gays are also protected under the First Amendment because there are many religions that sanctify their union. The concept of freedom of religion cannot be used to grant right to one group of people while discriminating against

Imagine being a homosexual United States citizen. Although life up until recently was difficult because of the constant discrimination, not being able to adopt children, strange looks when being with significant others, not being able to marry, and many more, the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges solved one of those problems. The law changed in June 2015 when President Obama issued that same-sex marriage was legal. Although the gay pride assemblage was satisfied that one of their problems was solved, the homophobic, heterosexual caucus was far from satisfied and discriminated the LGBT community even more. Many Christian companies that provide goods and services for people refused to provide homosexual consumers with their products simply

This article “Baked in the cake” is about a couple being discriminated because they’re a same - sex marriage. Phillips came across Charlie Craig and David Mullins in July 12, 2012 and declined to bake them a wedding cake because of his religious beliefs. Richard Wolf states that Philip states "I feel that the Bible is clear — what God defines marriage as," and, "For me to violate that would be

Barronelle Stutzman was a florist who loved doing custom floral work for one of her best customers, Robert Ingersoll. He has spent nearly $4,500 on flowers and arrangements done by Stutzman. Ingersoll asked Stutzman if she would design the flowers for his wedding ceremony. This request put her into a moral dilemma. It has never been relevant that Ingersoll is gay until now. Stutzman’s involvement in a same-sex wedding would violate her beliefs. She was asked to choose between her commitment to Christ and her affection for Ingersoll. She was deeply fond of Robert, but her relationship with Jesus was everything to her. Three years after that meeting in her flower shop, she has been filed discrimination lawsuits. She was sued personally and the point was to ruin her. Her case may establish a framework for how to resolve clashes between religious conservatives and the LGBT community, so her case was being closely watched across the country. The lawsuits against her went to the state court and she lost. She was then given a choice to either stop doing floral work for weddings altogether or to decorate same-sex weddings. She ended up agreeing to refuse all weddings while her case was pending. Freed is Ingersoll’s partner

Richard Wolf’s article, “Baked in the cake: Legal battles follow gay marriage ruling,” focuses on Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker and owner of Masterpiece Cake-shop, who will not design desserts for same-sex couples. Phillips has discriminated against same-sex couples and has been hiding behind his religion to do so. However, “his claim that the First Amendment protects his freedom of expression, based on his religious beliefs, failed to convince the Colorado Civil Rights Commission” for the reason that Colorado is part of the 22 states that have a law excluding discrimination to same-sex couples (Wolf).

In the case of Charlie Craig and David Mullins, the petitioners, versus Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd., the respondents, the court sides with the petitioners. This claim is based upon an argument meant to highlight the discriminatory nature of refusing service within a public accommodation. The actions of Masterpiece Cakeshop, first, violate the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Law as the bakery exists as a public accommodation, rather than an individualized entity. Second, it is invalid to believe Phillips was discriminatory on the grounds of conduct rather than character as one cannot exist without the other; thereby, Phillips cannot choose to abstain from baking cakes for same-sex marriages due to religious beliefs without denying service to same-sex

In “ Drawing a Line in the ‘Gay Wedding Cake’ Case” by John Corvino discusses the dispute between the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop and Charlie Craig and his fiancé David Mullins. Craig and his fiancé were awfully discriminated by the owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop as he refused to make a cake for the couple's wedding. He refused due to his religious beliefs and claims he was not discriminating based on sexual orientation as he offered to sell them items like a birthday cake or cookies.

Gay marriage is a very talked about topic in are country that shouldn’t be ignored. I believe men and women should be able to love freely and not be shamed by it. Marriage is a great factor in the United States. To some people it’s what we live for; is to get married and start a family. To not give everyone the same opportunity to have a happy marriage and family is unlike us. This problem is bringing a lot of hate, the same hate that was used in racial discrimination so why not give gays equal rights like everyone else. Andrew Sullivan wrote a article that shares his experiences of coming out and being accepted. When puberty hit he started to realize he wasn’t the same. He knew that his marriage is not going to be the same as his

The United States is a country built on a number of ideals and institutions. The moral structure of many Americans today was developed by our ancestors and the founders of this nation through the institutions that were a part of their lives. Family, religion, marriage, equality, and justice are just a few examples of the important components that provide a moral basis for our country. If any of these elements were to become too mutated, the effects on society could be devastating. Right now in the United States, one of these building blocks of society is being threatened by the possibility of a negative transformation. The building block of marriage as the sacred