Christian Thought Vs. Christian View Essay

Different religions have different views on animals as a whole. When referring to religion in line with euthanasia some religions wouldn’t allow euthanasia of an animal because of the possible side effects on reincarnation when another human passes away. This is in eastern religions(Buddhism,Hinduism,Jainism), a value is given to the animals life so that if any cruelty or euthanasia could potentially harm another human when it comes to incarnation. Most Christianity nations perceive animals as a possession. So any kind of cruelty/ damage to there possession is not tolerated. Animals are widely kept through out this religion and are seen to be a big part of many Christian families. In religions such as Muslim religion some certain animals are refereed to as 'unclean' animals, this is animals such as the pig and dog. This is why some Muslim families keep dogs but they will not be allowed in the house they will be outside as a working dog or used to guard the premiss.

The question of the correct ethical treatment of animals has been a topic of many heated debates. The basis of this discussion arises numerous premises that justifies the treatment of animals. Whether animal do in fact have a sentient? And what is distinctive about humanity such that humans are thought to have moral status and non-human do not? Providing an answer to the correct ethical treatment of animals has become increasingly paramount among society as well as philosophers.

(1') If God made animals solely for human use, then God would care most about those animals that humans find most useful. An animal's ontological worth would be equal to its usefulness to humans. However, consider Jesus' words: "Are not two sparrows sold for a cent? And yet not one of them will fall to the ground apart from your Father" (Mat. 10:29). In response to this passage, Richard Bauckham, Professor of New Testament Studies at

The passage of John 10:11 "I am the good shepherd. The good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep” emphasises the importance of animals in the hierarchy of creation and Christian’s responsibility to protect and care for them.

The Jewish religion has traditions that try to teach humans that everything created in the world belongs to God, and therefore they need to respect and preserve everything that God created, including animals. (Kemmerer p 170). The book, Animals and World Religions by Lisa Kemmerer was written to explore traditions of different religions which pertain to the treatment of non human animals. Chapter 5, Jewish Traditions, sheds light on the role and treatment of non human animals in the Jewish religion. The chapter starts out with background details about the emergence of the Judaism. Judaism emerged from early Middle Eastern religions but with the difference of having just one deity to worship (Kemmerer p 169). One God created the universe and

There are problems with both Tom Regan’s and Carl Cohen’s conceptions of the status of animals in society, but, overall, Regan’s is more consistent and applicable to all situations. Cohen also establishes a double standard regarding the definition of a “moral agent,” consequently weakening his argument for the use of biomedical testing on animals. Although I disagree with many of Regan’s ideas about the value of animals, I will not address these points in this paper. I will instead argue for Regan’s position and, in doing so, prove that his argument is more valid than Cohen’s.

Catholic views on animal abuse is varied greatly. The ‘traditional’ view is that humans are made in a different image than animals. It proclaims that humans have been given ‘dominion’ over nature, meaning humans can use animals in accordance to their own needs (gen 1:28). However, many Catholics disagree and believe that God gave human ‘stewardship’ over the animals, which means we are put on this Earth to look after and care for God’s creation (Luke 12:6). There are a number of Catholic authorities that discourage animal abuse;

Animal abuse is something that has been around since ancient times. Even Aristotle, in his own way, abused animals. He believed that animals were merely possessions. Aristotle even wrote in his Great Chain of Being how he believed the species on earth were arranged in a hierarchy, with humans being at the top and animals at the bottom, and that those at the bottom were only meant to serve those above them (“Animal Rights”). However, because they believed in the transmigration of the soul between humans and animals, the Pythagoreans and Neo Platonists thought that people should respect animals and their interests. So while many people may not have treated animals

Both in and out of philosophical circle, animals have traditionally been seen as significantly different from, and inferior to, humans because they lacked a certain intangible quality – reason, moral agency, or consciousness – that made them moral agents. Recently however, society has patently begun to move beyond this strong anthropocentric notion and has begun to reach for a more adequate set of moral categories for guiding, assessing and constraining our treatment of other animals. As a growing proportion of the populations in western countries adopts the general position of animal liberation, more and more philosophers are beginning to agree that sentient creatures are of a direct moral concern to humans, though the degree of this

What do you see when you visit a city for the first time, or look at a movie or, what do you hear when you listen to the news or read a book? The answers to these questions depend on your worldview. So, what is a worldview? A worldview is described as “the framework from which we view reality and make sense of life and the world.” David Noebel, author of Understanding the Times said, “A worldview is any ideology, philosophy, theology, movement or religion that provides an overarching approach to understanding God, the world and man 's relations to God and the world," Your worldview is like a set of lenses through which you view the world. Your worldview is formed by your upbringing, your education, your culture, the books you read, the

Due to the "highly subjective nature of most scientific theorizing... [we should] let the Bible speak for itself and modify our scientific view of origins accordingly." (as cited in Downey, D., & Porter, S., 2009).

Take a moment to think about the word "animal". Animals are not stuffed toys you find at the toy store. They are delicate living, breathing creatures that were given a life just as humans were. Their lives shouldn’t be taken away because of neglect, entertainment, or designer merchandise. They have to fight for survival against humans when we should be the ones cherishing them.

A Judeo-Christian interpretation from the Bible stated that “dominion over animals meant that any degree of exploitation was acceptable has changed for most people to mean that each person has responsibility for animal welfare (Aquinas T., 2006).”

The morality of killing animals for various of reasons has always been a big issue in the society today. People 's positive viewpoints on animals has been steadily improving at this period of time. This could be because of people beginning to realize and understand that animals are beings that has a behaviour similar to our own and that they have the capacity to feel pain and be appreciative like humans do after years and years of research has been done on them. Individuals who own pets could also possibly perceive this kind of response exclusively to domestic animals such as dogs and cats. There 's other ways why a person 's perspective of animals in general varies either positively or negatively. It could be because of the religion a person has as holy books tend to contain diverse statements concluding animals and their worth in this world. Religions in the olden days are tremendously powerful when governments has not been implemented properly yet therefore their influence to the country as a whole had a great impact towards people 's attitudes on different subjects of life which were carried through the generations until today.

In many religions it allows for humans to be dominant over animals for example in the Bible, Genesis 1:26 is says that’s God let humans have dominion over fish, fowl, cattle and all insects. Many different religious teachings actively encourage animal experimentations as long as there is no pain inflicted on the animals and the experiments will be beneficial to humans (Peek et al. 1997). In Hinduism cows are worshiped, in fact cows are not eaten and local villagers do not harm monkeys, there are now laws to protect these species in India (DeMello, 2012).