Christianity and Allowing Capital Punishment
The question of whether Christians should allow capital punishment is controversial and is often argued between many Christians. This question can be answered by using the bible to help them understand their morale and ways of life.
The Christians believe that Christians should allow capital punishment and they argue this by using the bible in Exodus 21 24 "eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot" this suggests that the bible is saying that if a person commits a crime such as murder then the criminal should be treated with the same crime. This shows that the bible says that if a person is guilty of murder then the criminal
…show more content…
This suggests that in the modern world capital punishment should only be used for only the worst crime and only to certain people.
The Christians would also argue that Christians should allow capital punishment because there is a principle of capital punishment is in the Old Testament law code. Also the example in Genesis 9:6 it says, "Whoever sheds man's blood by man his blood shall be shed for in the image of God He made a man." This supports the theory of "an eye for and eye" because this verse suggests that if a criminal is found guilty of murder he shall be killed as punishment. This verse also suggests that capital punishment should be based upon a belief in sanctity of life, which means that capital punishment should be based according to your belief and holiness in your life.
The Christians would also argue that Christians should allow capital punishment by using the Mosaic law to support their argument. The Mosaic law set numerous offences which could be punished by death. The first was murder and example of this is in Exodus 21 where God commanded capital punishment for murders ( or what the Old Testament described as "lying in wait". The second offence punishable by death was involvement in occult, which meant that if you were
One of many issues that have been core of moral and legal discussions over history has been the death penalty (capital punishment).
Max Soffar, whose mental illness left him particularly vulnerable to giving a false confession, stands convicted and sentenced to death for allegedly killing four victims during an armed robbery in a Houston bowling alley (Thorn, par. 2). The court overturned the conviction in 2004 because during his trial, lawyers failed to argue that Soffars confession contradicted the other evidence in the case, and he ended up on death row (Thorn, par. 4). From two unfair trials to a death sentence, the court ruled that the false confession given by Soffar should stand. In addition, his constitutional rights were not violated when his 2006 trial court judge refused to allow him to show that the only correct details in his fake confession were not the
I live in a state where capital punishment is still being practiced. In fact, I live thirty minutes away from a prison that executes the death penalty. Are we playing God by controlling who does not deserve to live? How can we kill anyone who is no longer a threat to the society? Most have committed terrible crimes in order to get the death penalty, but there are those that were wrongfully convicted. The law system is not perfect, it will never be perfect. Sure, they can get numerous appeals before they are executed. If there is no new evidence or new technology to prove their innocence, there is no use in giving them any number of tries before being executed. It was said that it cost more to execute the death penalty (from the time of
In America, we no longer feel that crime should go without harsh punishment. Tim Robbins’ film, “Dead Man Walking” is a movie about a man named Matthew Poncelet (Sean Penn) who is on death row, and the different things he goes through as he counts down his final days until execution. The movie is based on a true story. Through the movie, I was able to see the different the steps that a death row inmate goes through leading up to execution. I cannot really say that the movie was pro or anti death penalty because I think it covered both sides well. In “Dead Man Walking” the justice system was right, and they executed the right man. However, in reality our system isn’t always right and sometimes
The Evolution of the Christian Perspective on Capital Punishment One of the most controversial issues in modern society involves the implementation of Capital Punishment in criminal justice. Capital Punishment has been heavily debated in the realm of politics due to the many conflicting religious opinions over the issue; some of the most prevalent voices in this debate have been the Christian churches and their members. This paper explores the evolution of the modern Christian perspective towards capital punishment, the presently declared or undeclared attitudes of major Christian denominations, and the incompatibility between faith and personal values that capital punishment forces Christians to reconcile. Christianity’s attitude towards capital
Capital punishment also known as the death penalty, has been around since the earliest of recorded history. Capital punishment is currently used by 31 states and the federal government. The capital punishment debate always sparks controversy amongst people. Proponents argue that it should remain in place to punish those who have committed the most heinous crimes. While opponents argue that to take the life of a life taker, makes us no better than the life taker himself.
The Christian view of capital punishment is believed that Jesus requires them to oppose capital punishment. Many Christians believe and argue that God commanded "Thou shalt not kill" (Exodus 21:13), and that this is a clear instruction with no exceptions that Christians should not support the death penalty. Mistreatment and torture of individuals by governments for any purpose violates Christian instruction and must be condemned by Christians and churches where and when it occurs. God intends for life to be fixed.
Christians say that Jesus taught them that they should try to change the offender to not seek revenge. The 6th commandment says people should not kill yet society would employ a paid executioner if the death penalty was re-introduced. There could be a mistake being made by an innocent person for a crime he or she did not commit, there is also evidence that this has happened in the past.
Christianity and violence are always topics of discussion because many people have taken the terms and made it too justify their personal reasoning while in actually it might just mean to advertise love. In Genesis beacause Eve ate from the tree of the forbidden tree which caused God to made child birth a harmful pain, which further led to menstrual pain. God did not send us pain to kill us but to teach us a lesson of simply following the directions that we are told. The word violence can be defined as strength of emotion or an unpleasant or destructive natural force. However many forms of any violent will simply means harm because of the mentally block that we are ready have in our mind. In this paper I am going to discuss the teaching of Bible on violence, has the Bible been used to justify violence and how the Bible is not a violent religious text.
Whether capital punishment is fair or not a longstanding controversy. Currently the punishment has still been carried out in some countries, such as China and the United States. Numbers of capital punishment in China is in the first place, compared to other countries (Sterbenz, 2014). However, 98 countries have abolished capital punishment (Amnesty International facts and figures on the death penalty, 2007). Although most of countries have no capital punishment to crimes, it is still argued whether it can decrease crime rate and other social issues.
Imagine losing your dear beloved one and knowing the person who killed them, got away
accounting for the life of his fellow man. Whoever sheds the blood of man, by
If it were up to me, every murderer in this country would be put behind bars on death row and have their life taken from them just as they took the life of another. The guidelines of " an eye for an eye" go back thousands of years. Many countries still hold true to these guidelines. Although America doesn't follow the same as these countries, I believe when it comes to murder, they should.
The death penalty is a tough debate and an overwhelming argument in this country. We as Americans put Timothy McVeigh to death by lethal injection just three months ago. Arguments can be made for and against the death penalty, but this is not the problem. Capital Punishment is supposed to be a deterrent to crime, but is the death penalty really a deterrent? Capital Punishment is not a deterrent for crime, and the effects of Capital Punishment are actually hurting the American citizens. Capital Punishment affects the American citizens by having those citizens pay millions of dollars for death row inmates, and these criminals affect those same citizens because the
Welcome to America, the land of the free, of the prosperous, of the opulent. America the Beautiful, one of the only places in the world where all citizens regardless of race, background, or social class are constitutionally guaranteed life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that is unless you're on death row. In modern day America we are still faced with the antiquated ritual of capital punishment, a practice that interferes directly with the law of the land. The same forms of punishment used during the middle ages are still in effect today, the same ideas that should have been abolished had the U.S. government revised it's penology. Capital punishment is cruel as well as unusual and inadequate for our advanced society. The United