Norden, Martin F. The cinema of isolation: A history of physical disability in the movies. Rutgers University Press, 1994. Print.
In the introduction of this book, Norden reveals the phenomenon that most movies tend to isolate people with disabilities from other able bodied characters and examines the reasons of the isolation. His main claim is the way mainstream society identifies disabled people as an isolated entity is a result of both political and historical factors. The first sub-claim he proposes is that to isolate people with disabilities is a political strategy of sizable proportions. His evidence is that societies take this “divide and quarantine” approach for self-continuance, since societies can maintain powers by controlling the
…show more content…
The evidence is that in ancient societies, disabled people were discriminated because they contributed less to the community and were considered as evil and lack of spirits. Many ancient works depict disabled people as the “punishment from God” for their physical impairment (7). Also, Norden points out that the Bible describes disability with prejudicial attitudes, as Jesus provides healing for men with disabilities instead of accepting them to be equal individuals. These portrayals in literature remain in the cultural context and are applied to the depiction of disabled characters in movies. The warrant of Norden’s discussion is that political and historical factors can shape the mainstream society’s assumptions of disabled people and form the stereotype that disabled people are isolated from the majority. These assumptions may increase future discrimination and isolation and conveys a sense of self-loathing among the audience with disabilities themselves. The warrant for this article is that political and …show more content…
It enlightens me to upgrade my topic to a higher level by extending my discussion to the field of politics and history. This book provides background evidence for another article of Norden, “‘You’re a Surprise from Every Angle’: Disability, Identity, and Otherness in The Hunchback of Notre Dame”, since that article criticizes the inappropriate depictions of Quasimodo while this book points out the reasons why the depictions are widely applied in films. Also, it extended by “Introduction: Disability as Narrative Supplement” written by Mitchell and Snyder, since Mitchell and Snyder identifies the reasons why disability is interpreted with assumptions, and Norden narrow down the discussion to the representation of disabled characters in films. So I will use this source to provided evidence for the cruelty received by Quasimodo since he is being isolated throughout the film. And I will combine Norden’s articles and the article of Mitchell and Snyder to apply this cruelty to the cultural context and explain the reason why the isolation is depicted in the
Ultimately, as Shapiro emphasized throughout the reading, the stereotypes that exist around the disabled population is that main perpetrator to inequity. The infantilization leads to “the paternalistic assumption that disabled people are not entitled to make their own decisions and lead the lives they chose.” Destroying the stereotypes that disabled people are incapable of living a successful, meaningful life without being the means of pity of inspiration will lead to the destruction of the systematic oppression disabled
What comes into one’s mind when they think of a disabled person? Most people feel pity and embarrassment, and feel these disabled people are nothing but useless. In “Disability,” writer Nancy Mairs discusses the experience of being a disabled person in a world focused on strong and healthy people. The danger in this single story is that people with disabilities are discriminated against and put away with forgotten care. Mairs states, how debilitated individuals are continually barred, particularly from the media. People with disabilities are the same as the average American person, but because they are disabled, they are seen as meaningless human beings and
No Pity Chapter Update In No Pity by Joseph P. Shapiro, he first started off with the background and the internal characteristics of people with disability, “Tiny Tims, Supercrips and the End of Pity.” Shapiro discussed on how the society has been long held the idea of people with disability as a form of pity, a form of child-like-image and dependent. Followed that, people with disability, when they were young, were asked to be “feature” on a poster with a “promising goal” that it would raise enough money to support them overcome their disability; however, it is a form to increase pity in others. Additionally, people with disability do not want to be viewed as they are a form of pity; they want to be treated like everyone else.
Further, she demonstrates how she is treated because her disability marks her as “different” from the norm. She suggests, “Society is no readier to accept crippledness than to accept death, war, sex, sweat, or winkles” (Mairs p.4). In other words, Mairs emphasizes although disability’s mind is the same as healthy people, the society treats “disability” differently,
The mainstream press today when discussing a disabled celebrity disregards many of the persons accomplishments throughout their life, but instead focuses and finds themselves becoming more and more susceptible to drawing attention to their disability alone. Charles A. Riley II enlightens the able-bodied community on many issue’s throughout his book, “Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change.” He argues that the media is inaccurately depicting the disabled community throughout the use of advertisements, but may also be unintentionally disrespecting the community as well in face-to-face contact. Riley is a professor of journalism at Baruch College, and throughout his career, has received multiple awards for his writing’s on issues relating to disability. In Charles A. Riley II excerpt from “Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change”, Riley argues for a change from the media’s perception of disabled people, as a whole, due to how they are portraying celebrities within today’s media throughout the use of ethos, logos, and pathos.
In Nancy Mairs’ article for The New York Times, “Disability”, published in 1987, she expresses her distaste with the media's representation of handicapped people. Mairs, who struggled with multiple sclerosis herself, clearly and sharply conveys this disgust by stating, “I’m not, for instance, Ms. MS, a walking, talking embodiment of a chronic incurable degenerative disease.” (Mairs 13), and that she is actually, “the advertisers’ dream: Ms. Great American Consumer. And yet the advertisers, who determine nowadays who will get represented publicly and who will not, deny the existence of me and my kind absolutely”(Mairs 14). Mairs is greatly upset that disabled people are defined by their disabilities and, therefore, are underrepresented in public media. This might lead to one asking themselves, but why are they? And the answer, according to Mairs, is quite simple, “To depict disabled people in the ordinary activities of daily life is to admit that there is something ordinary about disability itself, that it may enter anybody’s life”(Mairs 14). Mairs concludes by pointing out how this effacement could have dangerous consequences for both disabled people and, as she called everyone else, TAPs (Temporarily Abled Persons) alike. Treating disabilities as an abnormal characteristic (as opposed to viewing them “as a normal characteristic, one that complicates but does not ruin human existence” (Mairs 15)) can cause one of these repercussions, as it makes the
Critical Disability Theory examines of the representations of people with disabilities throughout literature
Humans are social creatures. We identify ourselves through our community, loved ones, and those who genuinely appreciate our presence. Our identity defines our personality traits, highlight social roles. Those with disabilities are often confused about their identity because they are misunderstood and stigmatized. Through the use of literature, one can empathize better with other people especially those who are misunderstood by society. Disabled people are more likely to be neglected and subjected to prejudice or discrimination. In “Delusion of Grandeur”, Terry Ann Thaxton, talks about the struggle between Adam and his mother because of his disability. Adam struggles to cope with his environment and finds himself isolated and misunderstood. Families ultimately suffer but through their experience, they can learn some amazing lessons.
In the essay “Disability,” the author Nancy Mairs argues that the media portrays disabled people in an unjust manner. Mairs supports her claim by first appealing to the reader’s emotions, second by proving her credibility as a disabled person, and lastly by appealing to the reader’s sense of logic. Mair’s purpose is to prove that disabled people are just as normal as anyone else in order to persuade advertisers to represent the disabled on television, newspapers, commercials, advertisements, etc. Based on Mair’s informal tone and diction, she is writing for the common, intellectual audience who has the ability to make a difference in changing the views of the media and non-disabled people towards the disabled. Nancy Mairs introduces her essay
Writer, Nancy Mairs, in her essay, “Disability, “she portrays that there is no representation for people with disabilities in media, “especially television” (par 1). She supports this claim by exemplifying that the one time she saw a women with multiple sclerosis it was on a “medical drama” (par 2) that had romanticized the disability, and how that is not the type of representation that people with disabilities deserve since the doctor from the television drama “uses his medical power to strip” the woman from her independence. Mairs’ purpose is to announce to the public that people with disabilities are still people and they do normal people stuff like “talk on the telephone” or “order pizza” (par 4) in order to claim that people with disabilities
Disability has appeared frequently in recent films (Byrd & Elliot, 1988), a reflection of society’s interest in the subject. These films often misrepresent disability using stereotypes. These stereotypes reinforce negative and incorrect social perceptions of, and attitudes towards,
Displayed in the media to this day are people shown with disabilities. These people are wrongly perceived by society as heroes or sensations. Instead of focusing on that, we should focus on how they are able to overcome the disability during their daily lives. A very trusted author and professor of journalism, Charles A Riley, wrote a book called “Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change”. After carefully analyzing this text from Everything’s an Argument, it is clear that Riley wants to adjust the way society views people with disabilities. He is against the fact that people with disabilities are not known for who they really are. I agree with Riley’s stance and can feel what he is expressing throughout his text.
Mass Media plays a complex and dual role in both perpetuating and altering public perceptions of disability. Avenues in which we see public portrayals of intellectual, emotional, linguistic, age and physical impairments include television, radio, film, literature and various social media platforms. The utilization of media can either reinforce or challenge stereotypes that are widely accepted in western society. The layers of social strata within disability can be intersectional with gender, race, age and social class issues. This paper will examine attitudes about disability as a whole within the framework of North American society and media, as well as the meanings attached to the experience of being disabled.
In the media today, people with disabilities are perceived as tragic heroes or as medical miracles. They are rarely seen for their intelligence or for their accomplishments excluding their overcoming disability hardships. The textbook, Everything’s an Argument, contains an excerpt from Charles A. Riley II 's book “Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change.” Riley, a journalism professor at New York’s Baruch College, uses appeal to ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade his audience that their methods of portraying disabled people are in dire need of change.
This week’s discussion dealt with Individuals and Disabilities. Over the years, people who have a “disability" have been subjected to prejudice and more. And the first way to diminish someone is through language, by using words or labels to identify a person as "less-than," as "the others—not like us," and so forth. Once a person has been identified this way, it makes