Circle Justice Vs. US Criminal Justice System

The speaker argues that the criminal justice system in America treats you better if you're rich and guilty than if you're poor and innocent. Do you agree? Why or why not?

Circle sentencing is a scheme that was first implemented in the legal system of NSW to prevent gaol time for Aboriginal offenders. This scheme involves a circle of representatives deciding the sentence of an offender which does not involve a jail term. The representatives are normally made up of

Circle Justice is a Native American form of punishment. (Parker, 2016) It’s made to help “heal” those who do wrong. Criminal Justice System is a system that punishes anyone who violates the law or rules. How do we decide which one to use? Which one would you want used on you?

The Circle of Justice is a Native American form of justice, originating in Canada that seeks healing in contrast to the regular punishment ways. Some of the good things about this is that you don’t have to go to court, going to court requires a lot of work.

Circle Justice is a Native American form of justice that a group of people that come together to help someone learn from their mistakes, to become a better person. Strengths of circle justice It reduces repeat offending more than prison for adults and at least as well as prison for youths. It provides both victims and offenders with more satisfaction that justice has been done than it did in traditional criminal justice. It reduces the crime victims' desire for violent revenge against their offenders.

Courts are established social, political, and judicial institutions necessary for the manifestation of justice and the maintenance of law and order. The courts are part of the judicial branch of government, as outlined in Article III of the United States Constitution. Courts are the arenas in which the law is tried and applied. Judges are the presiding officers of the court. The United States Supreme Court is the most fundamental court because has "the authority to decide the constitutionality of federal laws and resolve other disputes over them," (United States Courts, 2012). This is true even though even though the court does not expressly enforce that law; enforcement is the province of the executive branch.

In any given year now, incarceration rates has tripled with approximately 13 million people introduced to American jails in any given year. This increase in the prison population far outpaced the crime rate and the US population growth. Today, America has around 5% of the world’s population but a quarter of the world’s prison population.

When looking at the current criminal justice system in Canada, New Zealand, and Australia, it is clear that it has failed in the treatment of aboriginal people. This problem has strengthened the idea of restorative justice as a replacement of the traditional system. When looking at implementing circles into that realm of restorative justice, there needs to be an agreement that their practices are diverse, and therefore not to force the issue. Many traditional practices are very spiritually based, and it needs to be evident that

Our criminal justice system has more than 2.3 million people behind bars. Nearly 160,000 prisoners are serving life sentences. There are 1719 state prisons, 102 federal prisons, and 901 juvenile facilities. 993 youth ages 17 and younger were in adult prison’s in 2015. Along with mass incarceration, there are also 840,000 people on parole and 3.7 million on probation. Criminalizing citizens who do not pose a threat to public safety (REF).

In what ways is the indigenous justice paradigm in conflict with the principles of the traditional, adversarial American criminal justice system? In what ways do the principles of Native American justice complement more mainstream correctional initiatives?

The three million people behind bars is an assumption based on the statistic that more than one in every 100 Americans are prisoners controlled by the state or federal government. In 2008, the prison population grew by 25,000 last year, bringing it to almost 1.6 million, while an additional 723,000 are locked up in smaller jails. At the time, there were 230 million adults in the United

Circles were found by the Native American cultures of the United States and Canada. These circles are used for many purposes. In the 1980s, the criminal justice system adapted and developed as the people of a first nation. Local justice officials had attempted to start building closer ties with the community and formal justice system. Going into 1991, Judge Barry introduced the “sentencing circle.” The sentencing circle means that the justice process will be shared with the community. The best-known sentencing circles were called the “Hollow Water First Nations Community Holistic Healing Circle.” The members of the community would gather around to deal with a high level of alcoholism. These circles represented a safe zone. Many had begun to

Circle justice is a court comprised of members of the community who come together to cast judgement upon someone convicted of something and think of a suitable punishment that will both help the victim and the perpetrator. Some of the things this may include for smaller incidents such as killing an animal would include the perpetrator getting a new dog for the victim and help take care of the dog. This not only helps the victim forgive and heal but it also helps the perpetrator think why the thing they did was wrong and learn how to fix what they did. This system worked better for Cole because of the fact that Cole needed to have his anger and superiority complex treated for him to be able to function. Prison could help Cole with his superiority

The U.S. government currently has about 2 million people incarcerated in the nations’ prison system. There are about 1.7 million more people legally enslaved in the prison system today than there were before slavery was supposedly abolished. The U.S. has only 5% of the

To choose between the two for me was very easy, I definitely prefered the trial over the circle justice. I found that the trial wasn't afraid to hurt feelings which got them the answers that they needed, so they could get to the bottom of things and find out who is guilty. With the circle justice I thought that they were too concerned about hurting others feeling which can prevent them from getting all the evidence from the case, also too I thought that the circle justice caused an outcome/ solution where the convict can get away with doing something easy and not actually changing. With a trial the person found guilty will get a punishment based on what they did and how bad of a crime they committed, the punishment will vary and it will be