Citizen Kane As A Dramatic Tragedy

The film was made in 1941 and won best screenplay at the Oscars and was also nominated for best picture, best director, best actor and best cinematography. It was directed by Orsen Welles and its main actors were Joseph Cotten , Dorothy Comingore and Agnes Moorehead. The film has aged incredibly in the last 75 years from its release and has defined film in how good it really was. Citizen Kane changed the way movies are made because it became the starting point for many filmmakers first learning about how films are made and how a director can give a film a particular style. The editing (by Robert Wise) was as innovative as the cinematography by Gregg Toland - add these two talents to the talent of director Orson Welles not knowing how to direct properly and you have stylistic flourishes and a film that still impresses today. It didn't immediately change how movies were made citizen Kane was actually a somewhat forgotten film for several years until it was rediscovered in the late 50s - but it was definitely ground-breaking and many of the techniques used were copied and used by later directors.

Orson Welles’ 1941 classic film Citizen Kane tells the story of Charles Forster Kane. The turning point of the film is when Jim Gettys attempts to blackmail Kane. The scene demonstrates Kane’s fall from grace through pride. His reactions to the other characters in this scene (Mrs. Kane, Susan Alexander, and Mr. Gettys), the angles that are shown in his perspective, and the lighting of the scene helps to demonstrate this point. It is after the blackmail scene that, in desperation, Kane tries to regain his credibly with the public and

Citizen Kane, made in 1941 by Orson Wells, presents a biography of Charles Foster Kane and used an approach to plot order that was radical for its time. It was a pioneer in advanced techniques such as using actors and objects at different distances and keeping them in focus, longer shots without cuts, and non-linear storytelling. Citizen Kane and the techniques used would affect Hollywood cinema for years to come. The movie, Citizen Kane, consisted of nine sequences, five of which are flashbacks. It starts with Kane’s death then is followed up by the major events in his life.

Citizen Kane was a 1941 American mystery drama film, which was starred, co-authored, produced and directed by Orson Welles. The film was a huge box office success and was nominated for nine Academy Awards. The film is revered as one of the greatest films of all time and is continuously voted atop movie polls. Critics praised Citizen Kane for its cinematography, music, and narrative structure which were innovative for the times. Orson Welles stepped away from the typical Hollywood style to introduce a fresh take on storytelling, special effects, lighting and scene framing.

Citizen Kane is directed, produced by and stars Orson Welles and was made in 1941. Citizen Kane follows the life of famous newspaper tycoon Charles Foster Kane and was a very controversial film for its time. Citizen Kane does not come under one specific film genre but falls under the heading of several interesting genres, which include biography, narrative, detective and news-paper reporter genre. ‘Film Noir’ is also associated with Citizen Kane as it has many genres but also a very specific style that differs from the classical norm of Hollywood movies. This movie became extremely significant for its time and changed the face of film history. Orson Welles brought about a new way of filming with his use of low angle shots, three point lighting,

"Citizen Kane" is one of the best critically acclaimed films of all time. It is everything a lot of the movies now a day only dream of being. This film is way ahead of it's time in all senses. It uses a non linear approach to the story telling, which is something we've been seeing a lot of recently but was rarely found in films from the forties. The visual and audio elements of this movie are also unbelievable. With all the technology we have now, it's hard to image how Welle's pulled it off in 1941. "Citizen Kane" is definitely a film that proves how a movie can be great with little to no technology available.

As esteemed film director William Friedkin once said; "Citizen Kane is a quarry for filmmakers". It is undeniable that Citizen Kane is the epitome of the great American film. It was initially released in 1941 and was met with great criticism . However, since its release many years ago it is evident that the film made advancements in cinema techniques which were well ahead of its time . The foremost reason Citizen Kane is considered one of the great American films ever created is due to the innovative film techniques that director Orson Welles brought to life .These techniques include new methods for cinematography, lighting, and sound .

Struggle defines the movie Citizen Kane by Orson Welles. We struggle to follow along with it’s haphazard sequencing of events. The dark lighting strains the eyes. We even struggle to follow along as to where we are. There is narration but only that which helps tell the story of Kane, not where we are at the moment. That we must discover for ourselves as we follow the journalist through his investigation. Citizen Kane utilized unique camera angles that were not used in the cookie-cutter Hollywood style. Ceilings were almost never shown because it would expose the stage. The camera did not make you feel like an audience member sitting in the middle of a theater watching the story. Citizen Kane actually takes you into the world as a member of that world, a bystander that see’s these events first hand. The camera had a lot to do with that. In the opening scene the fades from shot to shot. The camera places you in realistic positions. Classic Hollywood films at the time were very much like going to a theatrical theater, such as an opera house. The camera angles were very limited.

“Citizen Kane” was the first feature film of Orson Welles, who at the time was well known for his work in radio and theatre. Released in 1941, the film has often been regarded as one of the most influential films of the century, still having a significant impact on modern filmmakers all over the world. The film even held the number one title of the BFI’s “Sight & Sound” poll for 50 years, meaning it was considered the greatest film of all time by hundreds of top critics in the business. Now, it still ranks at number two, recently being overtaken by Alfred Hitchcock’s “Vertigo”.

Citizen Kane is considered to be one of the, if not the, best films ever made. While I personally fail to see the appeal, and I wouldn’t probably classify it as the best film ever made, I can admit that some parts of it were quite interesting, one of them being the psychology of the characters. More specifically, the main character. Charles Foster Kane. The plot revolves around a journalist trying to find the meaning behind his last words and in doing so, contacting people who knew and had a connection with him.

The film “Citizen Kane” was overall a good movie, but has some ups and downs. The plot of the film was interesting, it show a story of a man from life to death like a biography. He was taken away from his parents at a young age to becoming a multi-millionaire by owing a tabloid newspaper. The constant flashbacks really help understand Kane’s reputation. I like how they portrayed Kane as a sophisticated man who had great confidence, but towards the end of his life he loses his fortune, which led to distancing himself from his fellow colleagues. The movie is held to a high standard because of its creative freedom, which allows directors to speak about their belief without fearing any backlash. The controversy over the character Charles Kane,

Citizen Kane brought the aspects of a newspaper tycoon in the 1940’s to life in a form of a dramatic narrative. This film is based on a true story of a newspaper magnate, William Randolph Hearst and based off of some aspects of Orson Welles(Writer and Director). This filmed has been named, “The best American film of all time” due to the fact that, during the time of its making, it was the first film to take on many new techniques of cinematography. Citizen Kane is a revolutionary film not only in the drama genre, but in filmmaking of all forms.

Citizen Kane is a movie about Charles Foster Kane, a publishing tycoon, who was taken away from his parents when he was a child, to be given a life full of opportunity, only to die alone, with no one to comfort him. This movie was one of the first movies to challenge the traditional narrative and technical elements of Hollywood Cinema. Classic Hollywood cinema, which developed between 1917 and 1960, was a particular way that films were produced during this era. It consisted of certain technical devices to establish narrative logic, cinematic time, and cinematic space (Wikipedia, 2016). Orson Welles, who directed, produced and starred in the movie, deviated from telling the story in traditional narrative, which was often told by one person

Citizen Kane is a 1941 American drama film by Orson Welles, who was its producer, co-author, director and star. The film is about news reporters following the death of a publishing tycoon, they scramble to discover the meaning of his final word that he spoke: “Rosebud”. Citizen Kane won the title as the greatest film ever made when it topped the 1962 Sight and Sound poll. It held the top spot for 50 years until it fell to second behind Vertigo (1958). The film is commonly praised for its intricate plot, filled with flashbacks that shuffle the chronology of Kane's life, its extraordinary performances, its marvelous technical stunts, and its deep-focus photography. The story telling technique is one of the techniques that made this movie different

The movie Citizen Kane targets an audience that in my opinion has to have an appreciation for film. Someone who is studying film or has a passion for it will know exactly what he or she is watching. Though, I am in a film class my taste buds haven’t truly developed. I didn’t understand the true nature in which it was shot nor did I understand the plot very well. Disliking the movie was difficult due to the fact I was trying admittedly hard to understand Gregg Tolland and the concept of the film.