preview

Civic Service Claim

Decent Essays

Claim: The U.S. should have mandatory civic service for two years between the age of 18 and 25 Type of claim: Policy claim- the claim states that something should be done. For this argument one must clearly explicate what is considered a “civic service”. A supporter must identify what is considered a civic service because, it’s a matter of degree and leaves the argument susceptible to attack. Civic service could be mistakenly associated with civic responsibility, for example volunteering and voting. Questions such as “what is a civic service” can disrupt the advocate’s argument. The misunderstanding of what is considered civic service could potentially be harmful to the Advocates proposal, therefore the advocate must be precise to avoid …show more content…

This diminutive change provides the audience with a more precise and clearly defined claim. The audience most likely will have a more positive response to the claim because American society values military service Jury duty and other social services enforced by the law. With the current version of the claim more emotional and logical appeals can be made to refute those supporting. From the USA Today journal an article on forced civic responsibilities was written called, “Forced voting won't cure indifference, ignorance”. In the article a strong point was brought up against mandatory voting. “One of the main reasons non-voters avoid the ballot box is that they just don't care enough to get informed. That's sad. But forcing them to vote won't change that.” This makes a strong case against the idea of mandatory civic services, in regards to civic responsibility. This creates the opportunity for the opposing advocates to persuade the audience to agree that it is against their best interest to support mandatory civic services. If the audience feels that there votes are being overshadowed by those who are not concerned with political elections they will want to prevent forced voting to help protect their own interest. Multiple Questions could be used to argue the claim such as “What is considered two years of service”. For this argument we will consider civic service to include civic duties and civic responsibilities. If both are considered civic service it is difficult to determine what two years of service would be for responsibilities such as voting and volunteering. Those opposing could question what is considered two years of voting? Advocates against the claim could also question what is considered two years of jury duty? Those arguing could benefit by using peoples appeal to democracy and discussing how making civic services mandatory conflicts with your civil liberties. People

Get Access