Civil Disobedience And Its Impact On Society

Brilliantly put by what many deem to be America’s greatest president of all time, Abraham Lincoln, “Let every man remember that to violate the law is to trample on the blood of his father, and to tear the charter of his own and his children’s liberty.” Civil disobedience is defined as the refusal to comply with certain laws as a form of political protest. Although many may argue that this is the sole way to keep the government in check and to make minorities heard, rational people will realize that it is not this disrespect of the law that proves the democracy of our nation.

Civil disobedience has been an act practiced by free societies across the globe. It has been a highly controversial topic in the Unites States over the years, as some believe the so-called "peaceful resistance" exemplifies too much defiance to the government. However, most believe that performing civil disobedience exercises many rights incorporated in the Constitution. Civil disobedience positively impacts a free society by allowing its citizens to express their opinions in a matter which draws the attention of the government, and heightens public awareness.

Civil disobedience has gained a significant number of people their rights and continues to make a difference. Defiance has inspired a generous amount of change in the world around us, and provided frequent opportunities for creation.Without our capacity to disobey, we would never have been able to question authority and make incredible advancements in science. We would not have even created our own country. Although some rules can help to prevent situations total anarchy, disobedience has unequivocally had a major positive impact on

Civil Disobedience is remarkably effective without the violence that many had thought necessary. Several famous examples include the Salt March of Mahatma Gandhi, the Civil Rights movement of Martin Luther King Jr., and even the sit-ins of the factory workers during the industrial revolution. Although, many still argue that civil

The history of American, non violent, civil disobedience depicts how peaceful resistance can shape public opinion, voice dissent, and change unjust laws. In both Contemporary and past history do we see the role that protest has on our Democracy,and how dissenters, such as Susan B Anthony and Martin Luther King Jr, can become American heroes. The United States was founded on an act of civil disobedience, and even in Modern America, principled dissent has become the highest form of

One of the most widely known event would be when Mahatma Gandhi employed nonviolent strategies such as hunger strikes and protest marches in order to fight oppression. In 1930, Gandhi started the “Salt March” which was aimed at the British “salt tax”- Taxing on Indian salt so the people would have to import salt from Britain. Indians were unable to both collect and sell salt because of the British salt monopoly in India. The march and hunger strikes eventually led India to independence from the Brits. Gandhi’s success in guiding his country to freedom by conducting nonviolent means has proven civil disobedience and direct action to be

Civil disobedience and peaceful resistance to laws have instigated within our country, in so many instances, much-needed change. The Boston Tea Party, the Suffragettes, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights movement are only a few examples of times that civil disobedience has redefined our country. Without peaceful resistance to laws on moral or political grounds, the citizens of the United States would not have many of the freedoms we value.

Gandhi opposed the country's controversial motion to fingerprint and document all Indians, leading to his many achievements in the field of civil disobedience. Gandhi became the face of a movement of noncompliance. Thousands of Indians rejected the new law, resulting in their eventual arrests (along with Gandhi). Although they were arrested, it was the statement made that counted. Gandhi and his followers were able to lead a movement against the current, fully demonstrating their power with the organization of the month long Salt March in response to the egregious salt tax that weighed heavily on impoverished Indians. Gandhi led thousands to the coast of the Arabian Sea in seek of Salt. Due to his rebellion to the law, Ghandi and some 60,000 more were arrested, and others were violently beaten by British police. However, the March continued on. Eventually, Gandhi made a deal that resulted in the end of the March, and in return, an amending of the tax. This is a prime exhibit of the wonder of civil

A common argument amongst many citizens in America is whether or not peaceful resistance, or civil disobedience positively or negatively impacts a free society. With numerous examples of civil disobedience occurring in the past, it is easy to see how America was affected by these acts. America has progressed since her founding, especially since people have started to take a stand in what they believe in. Civil disobedience can positively affect a society through making others aware of an issue and sparking an urge for change.

Civil disobedience towards laws is an act of refusing to obey a law by not using violence or war, physically. Doing something peaceful means more than just nonviolence, but doing an action that causes other people to react in a calm way in return. In a free society, peaceful resistance to law can cause a lot of change that can be both positive or negative. However, I do believe it has way more of a positive impact than negative because a resistance speaks up against a law that they do not believe in and to create change. Through a more peaceful approach, resistors will avoid spreading any means of hate, while still having hope to change the law.

I think peaceful resistance to law positively or negatively impact free Society because it demonstrates that people are in their country to live for every name. Rosa Parks was an amazing example because she knew the long respected it but chose not to follow it when she sat in the front of the bus. Amazing Minds like Marther Luther King jr. Was also an amazing example that you can possibly save the things you want to say and he went to jail but he chose to continue to fight for what he believed in. Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau is an amazing piece of work it shows people that you can respect it but you don't have to follow it in every aspect. In the letter to Birmington Martin Luther King Jr. Demonstrates that he can possibly write

To be fully engaged in the democratic process means more than voting in elections for me. It is fulfilling a civic duty to improve the American definition of democracy in any way that I can. This may, at times, include civil disobedience and peaceful resistance. Not just through voicing my own political opinion, but also in ensuring that those who are absolutely diametrically opposed to me can safely voice their opinion as well. This means upholding objectivity in government administration while also advocating for what I believe in. To be fully engaged is to right wrongs wherever they may exist in the current legal system. This can be achieved by unorthodox methods.

What is a free society? Freedom is defined as the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. Therefore there can be no question if Civil Disobedience positively impacts a free society. Time and time again it is proven that positive results are obtained from peacefully disobeying laws. The Civil Rights Movement, which is quite possibly the most important era in American history, was greatly fueled by all of the brave people that took part in Civil Disobedience. The sit ins, the taking of bus seats, Freedom Rides, marches, etc. helped gain a large group of people their well deserved rights. One of the most famous activists in the Civil Rights movement, Rosa Parks, said "you must never be fearful

Civil disobedience is positive because it can bring a problem, that some people may view as unimportant, to the eyes of others. Over the past few years, many young African American Men have been shot by police. The loved ones of these men have practiced civil disobedience to show disapproval for the injustice the police have done to their loved ones. In Ferguson, Missouri, the family of Michael Brown started the protests in a civil manner and the problem was resolved in a quick manner. These events in Ferguson, Missouri show how civilly protesting a wrong doing can bring a problem to the public eye so it can be resolved quickly.

I don't think anyone should resist the laws, wether it's peaceful or not. If you feel like you should resist then peacefully would be best. I don't think it would be a positive effect or negative effect. I think it would be more positive if you did it peacefully, if you didn't do it peacefully that's where it will become a negative impact. I think everyone has a right of freedom of speech and that they have to right to voice their opinion. At the same time there is a way to go about that. Having an attitude or being angry and resisting in an outrageous way is negative and the situation will just escalate. Many people don't think about both sides of the field. Many people only defend or see one side. "Most of the critics of civil disobedience, although they may not have expressed definitive