Civil Disobedience Research Paper

Each act of disobedience directs attention towards a specific idea, and prompts the society to talk about it. It also gives licesnse for the liberated members of that society to form their own opinions about the idea. Since the protest harms no one, save the individual who is willing to face the consequences of breaking the law in question. It does not infringe on any other individual's rights. Peaceful resistance to laws has a positive impact on a free society since it educates that society's members and may lead to more liberty for them, which would create a freer

Though, I feel strongly that no law should be broken, I do see purpose in the peaceful disobedience provided you are willing to suffer the consequences. Therefore I would have to agree that it positively impacts a free society. We are all under strict laws and it is our freedom to either obey or not, with the latter resulting in consequence. Take for instance, the protest against injustice, the harmless act that took place in the Negro movement with Martin L. King. Not to mention the fact pointed out in Arguments against Civil Disobedience, sums up the fact that if we do not argue a point, another point would never be made. Not all situations are to be defended but some should. It is like a growth among us, which completely leads me to disagree with (as mentioned in the attacks), self-law making. There must be a form of discussion taking place (within certain levels of citizens) in order to advance in changes to laws as they were originally written. That is what makes us a free society.

“The concept of righteous civil disobedience is incompatible with the concept of the American legal system.”

The history of African-Americans has come a long way through the years. They were first imported as slaves as property to do hard labor for their owners. With no freedom, they were forced to obey orders until a revolution appeared. It took a civil war to finally free blacks and to give them the right to be citizens of the country. It was then that the chains of slavery were finally broken, but the chain of discrimination still existed. Under racial segregation, colored people were not allowed to share public facilities and activities with white people. The Civil Rights Movement was then established with its goal to clear any segregation and discrimination against African Americans. In today’s society, discrimination has been banned, but a degree of segregation still exists in our community such as schools. Segregation has not yet ending. The civil disobedience of African-Americans can be examined be looking at its origin, the consequences they had to overcome, and the outcome after their fight to be equal.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society because it allows people to protest laws they find unjust without harming anyone in the process. Sometimes we have disagreements with our government and that doesn’t mean that we should start a revolution and over throw the government. With peaceful resistance to the law, there is more freedom and rights given to people.

Civil disobedience plays a positive, important and vital role in maintaining an active, passionate and free society. In the past it's course has shown to encourage and escort a variety of social reforms into developed stages that would be inferably unachievable without the roles that the right to civil disobedience has played. The framework of our country acts to prevent factions for fear of an inherent violent nature of displeased citizens. However civil disobedience proves the capabilities of a dissatisfied public to organize without relying on brutal force. Peaceful demonstrations display what I believe to be the core of our country. Land of the free, advocate of freedom of speech, and the right of the people to assemble peacefully; America

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society. America itself was built on the concept of adapting to meet the changing needs of society; its government outline was created so that the people could change laws when they needed to be changed, although the process is slow so as to avoid laws that are poorly thought out or do not represent the views of most American citizens. At several points in American history, there are times where only a few groups were fairly represented in government, and therefore, the needs of all the people were not represented accurately and we could not get the change we needed to happen. This is where civil disobedience comes into play - by peacefully and respectfully disobeying unjust laws that oppress American citizens, we get the attention of government officials who can do something to change the laws and right the wrongs that have been committed. Some well-known examples of this are the Women’s Suffrage movement and the Civil Right movement, as well as some recent examples, such as the Standing Rock protesters. By using peaceful protesting, we draw attention to injustices and garner the support and strength to say “no more”.

Peaceful resistance to laws most definitely has an impact on a free society, but it can be debated on whether that effect is positive or negative. For example, the effect might be negative in the case that others in the society view this act of peaceful protesting as an uprising or a rebellion. There’s a possibility that people will be protesting without grasping the concept of what they are fighting for. On the contrary, the effects might be positive in the case that other individuals in the society see this act of peaceful resistance and use it as a benefit to constructively work on bettering their society.

Peaceful resistance in a free society does allow for mostly positive change. There are always going to be people in a society that feel that peaceful protests are contemptible, but if the resistance is for a just reason, such as desegregation and civil rights, then it is a matter of moral value and the conscience of the people and the governmental body. For example, when Martin Luther King Jr. set out for his peaceful sit-ins and marches, he was not hurting anyone. He was put in jail for not having a permit for a parade. Martin Luther King Jr. was willing to go to jail for what he believed to be just and going against unjust laws that were inhibiting African Americans from living the life they rightfully deserved as citizens of the United States

Peaceful resistance to laws can have a positive effect on society. While any specific activity needs to be analyzed on an individual basis, civil disobedience is a useful healthy aspect of democracy. It allows for people, particularly a minority, to force important issues into the public spotlight while minimizing harm. Peaceful resistance to laws increases minority power, helps correct improper laws, and contributes to a strong democracy.

The American people have always stood up to oppression and lead the fight against inequality. Our nation’s history is packed with people who were not afraid to stand up for what they believed in: fleeing religious oppression, fighting unfair taxation, and standing against mistreatment of a fellow-man.

Peaceful resistance laws negatively impact a free society because it creates either non-peaceful protesting or violent actions because of the angry citizens who support what is being protested and so forth. It also causes unnecessary actions to be taken by police and perhaps new laws to prevent things like this. However, peaceful protesting does have an up-side. People are heard and do make a difference to change things, for example with Rosa Parks. Overall however, I believe it just causes more damage, angers more people, and makes society sad more often than it helps.

At this very moment, millions of Americans are engaging in peaceful resistance to the new Trump administration. Many more have turned to violent displays of opposition. In such a divisive time it is clear that we must all defend each other’s right to civil disobedience. William A. Haviland, author of "The Essence of Anthropology," defines civil disobedience as “the refusal to obey civil laws in an effort to induce change.” This resistance to laws is a necessary part of any true democracy. Henry David Thoreau defends this idea when he says, “If the machine of government is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law.” As one of the first and most acclaimed advocates of civil disobedience, Henry David Thoreau hit the nail on the head. If government is behaving in an oppressive manor, then it is not only the right, but it is the duty of her citizens to oppose what is unjust. Thus, peaceful resistance to

Civil disobedience and peaceful protest have been and caused a great impact on this country. The United States of America is something that has been greatly changed by these acts and continues to change due to the act of civil disobedience by the countries citizens. The use of peaceful protest and resistance to a law in a free society is something that impacts it for the better of the nation.

Civil disobedience is not a burden to the free society, in fact, it is, in essence, the free society. In able to be free, you must feel free and if there is an unjust act being forced upon you, it is your right as a citizen to disobey it. I say this with emphasis on the "civil" part. There is a peaceful way to execute every action. For example, Rosa Parks. One of the most historical displays of civil disobedience. She did not have to use force, violence, or threats to get results; she simply displayed her dissatisfaction with the treatment of her person by siting. There need not be force when trying to make a point.That bruises the the name of civil disobedience and threatens any future results. In order to keep order there must be someone