Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

In Henry David Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, he is writing to the American people. He is trying to spark a desire for change, for people to oppose their government without actions. He uses this work to criticize the American institution of slavery as well as the Mexican-American War. Thoreau is attempting to convey the importance of listening to one’s conscience over the laws, believing that it is more important to do what they feel is right rather than listen to the laws given by the majority. Thoreau feels that people should protest against their government, but not using violent actions. He is trying to persuade the people to voice their opinions and break the chain of majority rule. Thoreau is writing during the time of the war between the United States and Mexico, which took place between 1846 and 1848. He writes to oppose the government’s actions and policies during this time period. He refused to pay a tax that would support the war and was imprisoned for a day. Thoreau uses ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade his audience to agree with his view of the American government and to voice their oppositions.

Thoreau’s comment at the beginning of the essay, “that government is best which governs least,” is a fairly radical statement. Thoreau is showing that he thinks government is simply a nuisance, so less government would be less of a nuisance. I think that government is a necessary precaution to restrict chaos, however having only as much government as is needed is likely the best approach. In this sense, I agree with Thoreau’s comment, however today’s stereotypes would classify him as an

“They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it’s the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse.” In this quote from his essay Resistance to Civil Government, Thoreau defines the folly of thinking that perturbs the everyday citizen, that if they rebel, they will receive punishment for standing up for what they believe in, and that the consequences are not worth the plight. Thus, he implores that it is the government's fault that this change cannot take place, for the fallacy is in fact that our country was built on average citizens standing up against the British taxing the colonists unfairly, therefore our own government has impeded the change that laid the groundwork for the nation that we are today, and also were at the time this was written. Thoreau believes in the imperative duty of the citizens to stand up to the injustice of government, despite the consequences, due to our own personal moral duty to ourselves and our fellow man. In this essay, Thoreau states, at least three things that he wants the reader to do, and they are: take moral responsibility for doing the right thing despite the government wishes, avoid association with the government, and to disobey unjust laws.

Thoreau knows that the state can only harm your body, that they cannot harm your mind. The state “could not reach [him], they had resolved to punish my body,”(10) Thoreau uses a metaphor here, sharing that the state couldn't reach his intellect and his core, they could only hurt him outside in a hope to kill out that light inside of him. Thoreau showed that as long as you held onto your beliefs and your character that the government would never be able to take them from you. Thoreau shows that the power the government has over the people is deceptive, that the power the government hold is “a sort of wooden gun to the people,” as if to say that the people are simply misapprehending the government’s power. Thoreau preaches that the act of civil disobedience is sometimes a necessity, and he would rather go to prison than submit to the state's

A man once said "That government is best that governs least," that man is John L. O'Sullivan who argues that government is "evil". Thoreau takes this quote as a motto and centers his work, "Civil Disobedience" around this opening quote. The quote itself is self-explanatory and the fact that Thoreau "heartily accepts" this motto, tells us that he disapproves of government and its interference in our affairs. Thoreau would like to have no government at all but as he speaks as a practical citizen, he is asking not to get rid of government entirely, but to get a better one [724]. He wants the people in government to focus on what is right instead of what the law says is "just." If there's laws that our conscience tells us, is wrong, then we should rebel against them because if we have knowledge on the issue, and don’t do anything to prevent it, then in a way we are supporting it. Thoreau says "Cast your whole vote, not a strip of paper merely, but your whole influence.” He persuades his readers of his ideas through classical argument. Thoreau uses logos, pathos, and repetition, as well as analogies and metaphors to clearly present his reasons on why its better to have a government that governs least or have no government at all.

Henry David Thoreau was a philosopher, poet, and essay writer who lived from 1817-1862. His essay “Civil Disobedience” was written when the Mexican American war was happening and slavery was still being allowed. Thoreau made his essay trying to convince the people of that current United States to rebel against the government when the government is being unfair. His purpose was to create a community which was aware of the government and fight for others not just care for themselves. He did this to get people to care for the mexicans and the slaves who were being mistreated. Throughout the essay Thoreau sounds concerned for the people of his time who do not care for the mexicans or slaves. To convince his audience that we need revolution audience he appeals to their logic by using rhetorical strategies, like extended metaphors, rhetorical questions, and oxymorons.

We see brutality everywhere, we approach a problem with the easy way out, violence. That's the solution we all resort to when we see no change or when we feel that the injustices that have been done are too much to go unanswered for. Civil rights activist Cesar Chavez published an article claiming that nonviolent resistance has always been more beneficial than violent protest. Chavez’s purpose in this article is to advertise the negative effects of violence and provide a solution for it. In his article Chavez uses an inspirational and objective tone to illustrate how the effects of nonviolent resistance over time outweigh those of violent protest, he creates an appeal to emotion, logic, and authority to persuade followers of God, minorities, and people who have suffered injustices that have gone unanswered for. Chavez uses many rhetorical devices, the most prominent being: repetition, rhetorical questions and allusions to explain why nonviolence protest is better to accomplish their efforts.

Henry David Thoreau was a simplistic man and philosopher well known for his attacks on American controversies. Thoreau was full of opinions and had many problems with the way the United States was run. He had strong opposition towards slavery and spoke his mind when it came to politics. Especially when it came to the Mexican American war, which he heavily disliked. Ralph Waldo Emerson heavily influenced him, and introduced him to the ideas of transcendentalism, a philosophy vital to Thoreau's way of thinking and writing. Thoreau was not an agitator. He did not believe that there shouldn’t be a government, but only a better one than currently existed. The government would not improve itself, so he argued; it was a patriotic man's duty to refuse to support it.

Thoreau’s essay represents his beliefs about the government in 1849. He uses several logos with credible examples, and uses the emotions of the audience to support his argument. The first example of logos he uses is when he says, “The objections which have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government.” His claim is that it is unconstitutional to have an army standing or ready when everything is peaceful. The government should act under this same rule; if there is peace then the government should not be standing so to speak. Throughout the essay he continues to provide credible examples of why the government abuses its power and is useless; such as when he says “Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise, but by the alacrity with which it got out of its way. It does not keep the country free. It does not settle the West. It does not educate. The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had not sometimes got in its

Civil Disobedience makes governments more accountable for their actions and has been an important catalyst for overcoming unpopular government policies. To voice his disgust with slavery, in 1849 Henry David Thoreau published his essay, Civil Disobedience, arguing that citizens must not allow their government to override their principles and have a civic duty to prevent their government from using unjust means to ends. The basis for Thoreau’s monumental essay was his refusal to pay a poll tax, which subsequently landed him a night in county jail. In his passage: “If the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go, let it go; perchance it will wear smooth—certainly the machine will wear

Henry Thoreau's rhetoric seemed kind of impossible to me. His purpose for writing this essay was to bring enlightenment to the people. Henry claims the motto, "That government is best which governs least" and "The standing army is only an arm of the standing government" (disobedience1). The people are manipulated to think they have power, but like the army

The author Henry Thoreau’s interpretation of the role in which the government is to play in the going ons of everyday society in relationship to taxes in which they charge, in the letter Civil Disobedience is considered borderline insanity by some and ingenious by most. However it is theorized that said letter is written as an emotional outburst of rage, passion, and indignation. In being forced to pay, in his eyes, unjust taxes, back an unconstitutional war, and being lumped into a society that he himself did not make a conscious effort to join. Rather than being backed by facts and credible sources. With the focus almost solely upon pathos with a profound lack of ethos

When Thoreau walked from the prison door to the town common, he observed that “a change had to my eyes come over the scene- the town, and State, and country- greater than any that mere time could effect” (91-92). Thoreau was a perceptive man, meaning that he learned about his world by observing it. One night in prison made clearer to Thoreau the effects of disobedience on his place in society. Primarily, Thoreau’s night in prison allowed him to fully comprehend his relationship with the state, and with his peers.

Henry David Thoreau shows "Common Disobedience" as an equivalent and good man amongst his cherished siblings and sisters in the interest of tending to his administration's biggest issues. The selection alone be that as it may, talks really and altogether as a genuine American. In pretty much every part of his discourse; political, social, and monetary request, Thoreau addresses his assessments and convictions through his direct experience, man's most extreme essential social liberties and also inner will to help the advancement of another and good society.

Henry David Thoreau is the author of “Civil Disobedience” and is part of the force that sparked a resistance towards the government in the U.S.A.. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was an activist in the Civil Rights Movement. Both of these inspirational figures have had a deep effect on American society. As Thoreau’s and King’s difference in time periods and circumstances are demonstrated throughout the articles, the comparison in their purpose and methods can also be applied in a modern society.