Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Thoreau's Civil Disobedience talks about politics, government and the issues concerning these areas today. "Government is best which governs least." This motto means that the government should not have complete power over the people. The people's opinion is what matters the most. Individualism is stressed throughout his writing. To stand up for what you believe in and not bend backwards for the government is necessary. He speaks of Slavery and the war in Mexico and how is must be put to a stop. The people are responsible for this happening. Many people opposed these things yet did nothing to change it. Allowing yourself to be a part of injustice makes you a part of the negativity. Paying taxes to a corrupt government makes you

The belief of civil disobedience that is evident in present day America was created by Henry Thoreau. In the history of mankind, Thoreau is most notably known for his creation of the ideology that encourages improvement of the government, but only for specific reasons. This belief created by Thoreau became known as civil disobedience through the publication of his essay titled “Civil Disobedience.” In the essay, Thoreau continuously advised for the improvement of a government and also the person in that society, which he also believed the government reflected the will of an individual. Thoreau believed that civil disobedience against the government was necessary, but only for specific reasons. In the reading, Thoreau stated many reasons why one should not conform to the government, such as “But when the friction comes to have its machine, and oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have such a machine any longer” (Thoreau 3). Thoreau believed that one should change the government and not conform if that particular state has many injustices occurring against the masses in society. The metaphor in the quote establishes friction to resemble the government at work, such as laws passed and enforced on an individual. If the friction were to become unnecessary, harm the society, and benefit the government, Thoreau

The point of the essay is to encourage the reader to act upon their opinions. Thoreau believes that simply having an opinion or casting a vote doesn’t cause change in the world, so it is important that people take the necessary steps to fix the problems they face as a society.

Directions: Read “Civil Disobedience.” As you read, underline examples of Thoreau using rhetorical devices and identify and explain the devices via annotation. Answer questions 1-4 to prepare for further work with a small group. The group will work together on questions 5 through 8. Be ready to explain your answers to the whole class. Even when you’re working as a group you should be writing the answers.

We see brutality everywhere, we approach a problem with the easy way out, violence. That's the solution we all resort to when we see no change or when we feel that the injustices that have been done are too much to go unanswered for. Civil rights activist Cesar Chavez published an article claiming that nonviolent resistance has always been more beneficial than violent protest. Chavez’s purpose in this article is to advertise the negative effects of violence and provide a solution for it. In his article Chavez uses an inspirational and objective tone to illustrate how the effects of nonviolent resistance over time outweigh those of violent protest, he creates an appeal to emotion, logic, and authority to persuade followers of God, minorities, and people who have suffered injustices that have gone unanswered for. Chavez uses many rhetorical devices, the most prominent being: repetition, rhetorical questions and allusions to explain why nonviolence protest is better to accomplish their efforts.

Chavez has many rhetorical strategies throughout his essay in order to persuade the readers that nonviolent resistance is the best way to win. Chavez uses alliteration, pathos, and parallel structure to help get his point across and get the reader to pay attention.

In their declaration, “Declaration and Protest of the Woman of the United States” (1876). The National Woman Suffrage Association, a group determined to give women the right to vote argue they should have a fair say in elections. Two main leaders and supporters of this group included Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Susan B. Anthony. The NWSA first supports their claim by actually writing an Articles of Impeachment against the U.S. Government for violating their fundamental principles. Portions of the Articles of Impeachment include things among, better legislation for women, the issue of unequal sex codes, the right of judiciary of the nation, the written document of the writ of habeus corpus, taxation without representation, the Bill of Attainder,

Many people in America feel that the media describes black protests as riots as a way to promote racism in America, and impose into people’s mind that African-Americans are criminals. Authors from different places around America expressed their opinions online about the use of the word “riot” to describe protests made by African-Americans. Through intelligent use the rhetorical appeals of ethos and pathos in their online articles, authors aim to persuade their audience to actively engage with their articles and convince them that their points regarding this controversy of “ protests vs riots”, are strongly better than others’.

When Thoreau walked from the prison door to the town common, he observed that “a change had to my eyes come over the scene- the town, and State, and country- greater than any that mere time could effect” (91-92). Thoreau was a perceptive man, meaning that he learned about his world by observing it. One night in prison made clearer to Thoreau the effects of disobedience on his place in society. Primarily, Thoreau’s night in prison allowed him to fully comprehend his relationship with the state, and with his peers.

Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” is a essay written to oppose the laws of the government, opening the essay with the motto “that the government is best which governs least”. He talks about not paying the government's tax for years now, and being thrown in jail. Thoreau strongly disagreed with the war of mexico and slavery, therefore he did not pay for what he did not support. His reasoning for this essay is to explain how unjust the law is, using himself as a example, fighting for justice. Another thing I found as Thoreau message was to no let people blindly follow their government if they believe their rules and laws are unjust.

The idea of justice can be arbitrary. It can generally be decided based on what is deemed fair by the people, and most of the time, by the lawmakers. However, Henry David Thoreau argues in his essay Civil Disobedience that the use of moral conscience to discern unjust laws, especially from the government, and to peacefully resist them, is what serves true justice. Having been imprisoned once due to his refusal to pay the Massachusetts poll tax that supports the war against Mexico, Thoreau, as a Transcendentalist, started writing in his journal about the laws that the government imposes on its people to support unjust causes (Jacobus 134). Civil Disobedience discusses a relevant historical context— the widespread slavery and the Mexican War

Henry David Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" is an essay that attempts to persuade readers to oppose unjust government policies in general and the Mexican War and the institution of slavery in particular. Thoreau's argument seem anti-democratic on their face, particularly his disregard for majority opinion as expressed through elected representatives. But Thoreau reveals himself to be far more nuanced over the course of the essay. His fundamental respect for democracy and the Constitution coexists with a pervasive doubt about the integrity of politicians and the voting process, which significantly limits the ability of ordinary citizens to express their will in the first place.

Thoreau uses rhetorical devices in the "civil disobedience" to show crucial inequality within a country's government. Thoreau applies tone, diction, and imagery to point out the main factors that contributed to the crucial behavior of the government.

Thoreau did not pay poll tax for six years. He was then thrown in jail. Yet he seemed surprised by that fact that the government would throw him in jail for not paying taxes. While lamenting the fact that he is in jail, Thoreau also offers many philosophical rumblings about the government and expects the readers of his essay to take any of what he says seriously despite the fact that he is not qualified whatsoever to reflect of the state of the country's political system.

After reading “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau, I believe that this historic piece of literature can still have a substantial impact upon the current beliefs of the American people. The reason that this essay has such significance to America is because this essay addresses the proper way to go about civil disobedience in addition to providing education about the nature of civil disobedience. I believe the most significant message that this essay could teach Americans is expressed in this quote, “A wise man will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail through the power of the majority.” This quote expresses the need to not just believe in a cause but to actively support it. This is in contrast to a wide spread phenomenon called false activism that is prominent in society. We all know someone who is, and for the most part all of us are guilty of seeing a cause online, claiming to support it, and then not doing a single thing to progress the cause. For example, most everyone you talk to would claim to strongly support more environmentally friendly methods of gathering energy yet the majority of us have not done anything to progress the cause of green energy.