Civil Disobedience's Positive Effects On A Free Society

Edward Snowden is responsible for exposing these government secrets. Many call this an act of treason, but it can also be seen as an act of civil disobedience. The most peaceful nature of his rebellion, and the unconstitutional behavior that it consequentially exposed qualify his actions. Although it was wrong of him to escape the consequences of his actions by fleeing to Hong Kong, his actions were ultimately beneficial to the American public. Being spied upon by the government is a direct violation of our right to privacy, and hiding it from the public is wrong as well. From John Cassidy’s article, “Why Edward Snowden is a hero,” he quotes Ellsberg; “‘This wholesale invasion of Americans and foreign citizens’ privacy does not contribute to our security; it puts in danger the very liberties we are trying to protect.’” The act of bringing these facts to light is an act of trying to preserve our liberty, and that’s what civil disobedience is all about.

Throughout history protesters have said that civil disobience is the peaceful resistance of conscience. Civil disobedience was once the route to the democratic ways of our founding fathers of the United States of America. Van Dusen views civil disobedience as a physical attack to our democracy. I believe civil disobience is a negative force in our democracy that may lead to the destruction of our government because laws are disobeyed, causing new laws to come to order that follow the protester’s actions. I too have completed acts of civil disobedience, and I think my actions contribute to the negative force in a democracy. Civil disobedience began as a revolution for many rebels but eventually allowed ordinary citizens to damage the government

Though, I feel strongly that no law should be broken, I do see purpose in the peaceful disobedience provided you are willing to suffer the consequences. Therefore I would have to agree that it positively impacts a free society. We are all under strict laws and it is our freedom to either obey or not, with the latter resulting in consequence. Take for instance, the protest against injustice, the harmless act that took place in the Negro movement with Martin L. King. Not to mention the fact pointed out in Arguments against Civil Disobedience, sums up the fact that if we do not argue a point, another point would never be made. Not all situations are to be defended but some should. It is like a growth among us, which completely leads me to disagree with (as mentioned in the attacks), self-law making. There must be a form of discussion taking place (within certain levels of citizens) in order to advance in changes to laws as they were originally written. That is what makes us a free society.

Civil disobedience positively impacts a free society for several reasons. Not everything the government does will be accepted by those who know their rights. Protesting peacefully can bring a nation together and get the unimaginable accomplished just by unity. For example, Dr. King practiced protesting without the use of violence and today he is known as the most influential civil rights activist to ever live. He led peaceful marches with thousands of comrades, holding signs condemning the nation of all of the racial injustice.Change just can't happen over night, one must persevere and stand up for what is right no matter what people say. Without people like Dr. King we would still be living in a very much racist white driven world. We must

A common argument amongst many citizens in America is whether or not peaceful resistance, or civil disobedience positively or negatively impacts a free society. With numerous examples of civil disobedience occurring in the past, it is easy to see how America was affected by these acts. America has progressed since her founding, especially since people have started to take a stand in what they believe in. Civil disobedience can positively affect a society through making others aware of an issue and sparking an urge for change.

In society, we currently go through a lot of controversies that one could object to. One of the controversies that we face in society is how people with a certain viewpoint feel about non-violent protests (i.e. Civil Disobedience). Civil disobedience, a concept adopted from 1Thoreau Essay: Resistance from Civil Government published in 1849, defines this ‘’as the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws of the state and/or demands, orders, and commands of a government, or of an occupying international power.’’ During this time, he wrote this essay because he believed that individuals should not let government officials take over their consciences. He also showed his hatred for slavery and the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) which motivated him to write this paper.

In a free society, people are given the opportunity to stand up for what they believe in. I believe that the act of civil disobedience, or peaceful resistance to laws, positively impacts a free society for a number of reasons. Civil disobedience can have a positive effect when the government is flawed or when the law being resisted is wrong or prejudiced. In these situations, civil disobedience and peaceful resistance can mend some of the injustices that were being inflicted. All governments, including democracies, are flawed.

Civil disobedience positively impacts society. I suppose that depends on what you feel is unfair. For instance my mom has given me the freedom to make judgment calls on my own at the age of 16 whereas my brother who often didn't make the best choices wasn't granted this freedom until he was 18 I being 16 had bought myself a car kept a job and passing grades balancing all this i still managed to make time for my family and a girlfriend. To my brother this freedom i have earned was unfair after all, he was older why did his younger brother get more privileges than him? To him it was that our mom just liked me more and to protest he continued to do what he wanted behind or mom's back. This path of irresponsibility on his part put more pressure

I think peaceful resistance to law positively or negatively impact free Society because it demonstrates that people are in their country to live for every name. Rosa Parks was an amazing example because she knew the long respected it but chose not to follow it when she sat in the front of the bus. Amazing Minds like Marther Luther King jr. Was also an amazing example that you can possibly save the things you want to say and he went to jail but he chose to continue to fight for what he believed in. Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau is an amazing piece of work it shows people that you can respect it but you don't have to follow it in every aspect. In the letter to Birmington Martin Luther King Jr. Demonstrates that he can possibly write

Over the course of the United States of America, citizens have had the gracious ability to fight for what they believe is right. Written into the First Amendment of the Constitution is the freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition, granting citizens the right to fight for what they believe in. Some people do not realize the extent of how much more freedom America gives its citizens and how the right to even peacefully protest is a right that is sometimes taken for granted. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society in that over the years it has given those who have stood for what they believe, the rights that they stood for.

Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society because it empowers the people to speak out, it serves as a reminder that government is in the hands of the citizens, and it is the courageous way to publicize one’s opinion without violence. The evidence of the positive impact of Civil Disobedience is deep in the roots of American History, written on the sweaty brows of the feather-bedecked Patriots hoisting tea overboard in Boston; and sung in notes of the song, “We Shall Overcome”, by protesters being beaten and arrested at Selma. The very founding of America was an act of Civil Disobedience, as our forefathers penned the Declaration of Independence, defying Britain’s law and control. Over and over throughout history, groups have

Civil disobedience has a positive impact on society. This act brings about much needed change and helps a entire class of people. When Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. were fighting for civil rights for African Americans, following the law would have never taken them anywhere. If Rosa Parks had stood up and moved for that white man, the bus boycott would not have happened and that had a huge part on changing the segregation laws. Laws wouldn't change unless people fought for the change in them. Recently, the same sex couples were granted their right to marry each other. If people just sat around and waited for the law to change, it never would have. People got out and fought for their right to be married.People would stand outside the court

A free society is one without limitations on individuality, one where people can resist against oppression, against ignorance, against hatred. Peaceful resistance is essential to a free society. Without civil disobedience, individuals would be deprived of the values that make up the foundations of a democracy: freedom, justice, and independence. Throughout the course of history, individuals have utilized peaceful resistance as a means of demanding respect, equality, and liberation from oppression. Civil disobedience positively impacts a free society because it empowers individuals, allowing them to fight against injustice and prevent the government from abusing its power.

To be fully engaged in the democratic process means more than voting in elections for me. It is fulfilling a civic duty to improve the American definition of democracy in any way that I can. This may, at times, include civil disobedience and peaceful resistance. Not just through voicing my own political opinion, but also in ensuring that those who are absolutely diametrically opposed to me can safely voice their opinion as well. This means upholding objectivity in government administration while also advocating for what I believe in. To be fully engaged is to right wrongs wherever they may exist in the current legal system. This can be achieved by unorthodox methods.

When civil disobedience takes place among a person or group of people, a statement is trying to be made. There is a reason why these people are disobeying specific laws that were meant to protect them. They are trying to give their government a reality check on what is actually happening in their country. When government officials are elected or chosen and have power, they can easily abuse this power and become blinded by the realities that take place within their country. In an interview, Martin Luther King Jr. once said “I don’t think any society can call an individual irresponsible who breaks the law and willingly accepts the penalty” (Martin Luther King Jr. Speech). Dr. King explains how when people break