Civil Rights Of 1964 Research Paper

"Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the single most important piece of legislation that has helped to shape and define employment law rights in this country (Bennett-Alexander & Hartman, 2001)". Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, gender, disability, religion and national origin. However, it was racial discrimination that was the moving force of the law that created a whirlwind of a variety of discriminations to be amended into Title VII. Title VII was a striving section of legislation, an effort which had never been tried which made the passage of the law an extremely uneasy task. This paper will discuss the evolution of Title VII as well as the impact Title VII has had in the workforce.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 resulted from one of the most controversial House and Senate debates in history. It was also the biggest piece of civil rights legislation ever passed. The bill actually evolved from previous civil rights bills in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. The bill passed through both houses finally on July 2, 1964 and was signed into law at 6:55 P.M. EST by President Lyndon Johnson. The act was originally drawn up in 1962 under President Kennedy before his assassination. The bill originated from two others, and one of which was the Equal Opportunity Act of 1962 that never went into law. This bill made up the core of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Bureau of National Affairs 18-20).

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark legislation that resulted from a unique combination of public pressure, historical events, previous failed legislation, and a large-scale social movement. Many regard the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as the most successful civil rights legislation in history. There is no doubt that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 changed the way the society addressed race and gender, but it in the context of current events resulting in racial tension, it is worth examining the true impact of the legislation and how society can continue to move forward in matters of civil equality. This paper will provide an overview of the historical context of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and examine the legislation’s impact on society

After this act, being employed as a black citizen became more achievable, and made it possible and more probable for colored Americans to be treated equally and justly in their work life. Under the act, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was created, it had the “ ...power to file lawsuits on behalf of aggrieved workers” (“Civil Rights Act of 1964”). This also contributed to the uninterruption of the work

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is considered by some to be one of the most important laws in American history. (The Most Important Cases, Speeches, Laws & Documents in American History) This Act was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964 and it is a “comprehensive federal statute aimed at reducing discrimination in public accommodations and employment situations.” (Feuerbach Twomey, 2010) Specifically, it aimed at prohibiting “discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex (including pregnancy), and religion.” (Civil Rights Act of 1964, 2010) Additionally, it also

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the most important piece of legislation passed by Congress in the twentieth century. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the first strong piece of civil rights legislation introduced to Congress since the American Civil War. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed and passed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2nd 1964, after one of the longest running debates in Senate history. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was designed to end segregation and discrimination and to provide the minority population equal protection under the laws of and the Constitution of the United States. The question at hand is whether the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was necessary in order provide this protection.

Ultimately, the banishment of discrimination in public areas pushed the issue of desegregation over the edge. Eisenhower facilitated the movement of multiple acts and orders ensuring the rights of minorities across the country, determining that they cannot legally be discriminated against. Eisenhower, in his Civil Rights Act of 1964, stated, “An Act to enforce the constitutional right to vote, to confer jurisdiction upon the district courts of the United States to provide injunctive relief against discrimination in public accommodations, to authorize the Attorney General to institute suits to protect constitutional rights in public facilities and public education, to extend the Commission on Civil Rights, to prevent discrimination in federally

Due to the growing power if the civil rights movement, for example, Brown vs Board of Education and Rosa Parks, the Department of Justice was finally mandated to enforce federal hate crime laws when Congress passed and President Lyndon Johnson signed into law the first federal hate crime statute, the Civil Rights Act in July 2, 1964. The law expanded protection against all types of discrimination. It was finally a criminal offense if you used or threaten to use force to willfully interfere with any person because of race, color, religion, or national origin.4 The act prohibited racial discrimination in voting, employment, and education. It also outlawed racial segregation in all public places and most private businesses. President Johnson stated regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that “Its purpose is not to divide but to end division. Divisions which have lasted all too long.”5

In June 1941, President Roosevelt (FDR) signed the Executive Order 8802, in response to the pressure from the black leaders, to abolish discrimination in the federal government and defense industries. At the same time, Fair Employment Practices Committee (FEPC) was established to help enforce the order and redress valid grievances of the black workers [WWII Lecture]. The executive order and FEPC indicates progress in the civil rights for African-Americans. As a result, automobile industries offered jobs to many black Americans. Nevertheless, economic opportunity did not mean equal treatment. The workplace for the black Americans were segregated and had poor working conditions. Racial tensions began to explode over housing, jobs, and even over

We The People. Three simple words that hold irreversible truths about the founding of a nation. The Constitution of the United States of America is a document that was created ahead of its time. The founders of this country did not have a modern foreign government to emulate. Their innovative ideals of creating a governing power would allow citizens to be more actively involved in decisions made by elected officials. These elected officials not only have a duty to the government, but to the people of the United States.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 put a stop to public segregation and to the

On July 2, 1964, President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Federal laws,” 1998). Title VII of the act prohibits employment discrimination based on race, sex, national origin, or religion. Title VI prohibits public access discrimination, leading to school desegregation. Title VIII is the original "federal fair housing law," later amended in 1988. However, even after this and other legislation, blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans were still underrepresented in employment and education (Dorsen, 1994).

I feel that the civil rights act of the year 1964 was a big turning point in America because it gave African Americans real equality, it gave African Americans real freedom, and it was a step toward the acceptance of African Americans during a racist time. Not to say that fighting for this act was easy. How do I know? Well, I was involved in fighting to get it ratified. I took part in a lot of the protests, and was involved with a lot of the junk that came with them. Even if you were white, if you were friends with an African American, you were treated as an African American. I didn’t mind though. I would rather be part of a good cause with friends of color, than with my race insulting, and beating them. I guess I would say my stance on civil

Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice president Nixon, President Truman, Reverend Clergy, fellow citizens:

Over the years the Equal Opportunity commission has received many critics by civil rights advocates on the way it operates. The critics have been mainly about the unsatisfactory efforts and liability of the numerous discrimination accusations. It is stipulated that this poor performance of the EEOC is due to either lack of funding or lack of will and maybe even both. The various challenges that the EEOC has to improve are to first give more importance to class-based charges rather than focus solely on individual ones. An efficient change in the way the EEOC handles its operation is crucial to enable victims of all types of discrimination and harassment to claim their legal rights.