The advantages of patronage are when Congress set employee performance standards, high wages, high benefits, and good cost of living adjustments, it changes the lives of each people. Congress also can give protections for those who expose waste or corruption. Some people have advantages when having permanent jobs in the civil service because it helps them make money and provide for their family or themselves. However, the disadvantage is the hatred for those, who are not working in that field, which cause them to become jealous. The civil service system advantages were intended to create a class of administrative employees who were insulated from politics. Employees who were insulated from politics can better judge the true morality of each
Such as the Pendleton Civil Service Act that passed on January 16, 1883. “This act was passed in response to the discovery that Post Office officials and stagecoach operators had come up with a plan to steal millions of dollars from the United States government” This act also helped establish the Civil Service Commission. As a result, the merit system was created. Government jobs were now given based on the person’s ability to do the tasks, instead of given as a reward for political loyalty. (Sheppard Software
Even when all mechanisms are present to make the bureaucracy function cleanly and effectively, if there is a political facilitator who comes from the top level of the bureaucracy, these good systems can be compromised with just a phone call or some marginal note from the high-ranking elected official. Rules will be circumvented, budgets can be siphoned off to favor a project or an ally of the
Political patronage is defined as public offices awarded in payment for political support (encyclopedia.com). Patronage was a major part of Chicago-style politics. “Chicago politics is a national cliché … of a one-party system, dominated by a boss-controlled Democratic political machine” (encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org). Under the political machines in Chicago, whoever was in power could “hand out contracts, jobs, and social services in exchange for political support (Engber). In 2006 the Chicago Sun Times reported that “at least 79 current or former Illinois, Chicago or Cook County elected officials had been found guilty by judges or their own pleas since 1972” (nbcnews.com).
There is a plethora of criticisms about the effectiveness of the Bureaucracy. Even during the 19th century, as Wilson writes, the Post Office “was an organization marred by inefficiency and corruption”. With an appointment standard such as the “spoils system”, where individuals or groups are granted high level positions based on political favors alone, corruption is almost a certainty. The political aspect of the Bureaucracy was prevalent in the military for over 100 years, as Wilson states “the size and deployment of the military establishment in this country was governed entirely by decisions made by political leaders on political grounds”. Political favors and factors plague our government, including the Bureaucracy. A by-product of these political favors and corruptions are stagnancy and mediocrity. An example of this, as
The patronage system is a practice in which a political party who wins an election rewards its campaign workers and other active supporters by appointment to government posts or other favors. Though some would deny it, we continue to have patronage going on today.
Patronage, or The Spoils System, is the system in which government positions are handed out to supporters that helped the candidate get elected. According to the Oxford Dictionary of English, “Patronage is the power to control appointments to office or the right to privileges.” Most of the Presidents that were elected in the late 1800s should not have been elected because they didn’t win the popular vote. Instead, they were put
The history of the bureaucracy dates back to when our country was first founded. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson set the bar for civil service. Washington knew that the people he appointed would be in important governmental positions, so he had to choose wisely. As time passed the system became more corrupted. Andrew Jackson gave government jobs to those who supported his campaign. After Andrew Jackson, the civil war was fought, therefore
Samuel Krislov explored the issues of merit systems, personnel selection, and social equity. He argued that a more appropriate basis of comparison is race, ethnicity and sex. These factors are assumed to be a key source of socialization, and thus of values. A large portion of experimental research on representative bureaucracy in the United States is devoted to examining the extent to which bureaucracy reflects the basic demographic
Landè defines clientelism as a “Vertical dyadic alliance, an alliance between two persons of unequal status, power or resources each of whom finds it useful to have as an ally, someone superior/inferior to them.” Patronage is defined as “the exchange of political sector jobs for political support, the patron is an office holder who has access to state resources. One of the necessary conditions for clientelism to exist
When I was in high school my father introduced me to the power of the written word; the
In bureaucracy there is a separation of powers, checks, and balances, these internal checks are required because it brings accountability within the bureaucracy. There are four main types of mechanisms that can be put in place, whistleblowing, law judges, senior executive services and the representatives from the demographic. However, these different mechanisms have limited effect on the bureaucracy. Whistleblowing is one of the most effective mechanisms of accountability because superiors are reported on when they partake in any unethical behavior that put the government in a detriment. However, whistleblowing is not easy to do, even though there is a protection act in place for whoever partake in it but the case must be thoroughly be investigated
After looking at all those critical points of view about bureaucracy one should ask himself a question: If this system has so many disadvantages, why is it still so relevant in the world? Or is it still relevant? Du Gay, who is one of the most famous protagonists of
Advantages of seniority pay is a way to ensure promotions and growth within the company. For instance, a union job may require an employee to work for a particular
Max Weber concluded that the formation of a government bureaucracy is critical to its success in administrating public goods and the interests of the government. The disadvantages and advantages are numerous on both sides of bureaucratic theory. One of the major cons of bureaucracy is the system of patronage. The patronage system is basically where the president appoints individuals to certain positions as Public Administrators as a reward for their service to them. This system of bureaucracy also supports the spoils system which runs along the lines of political parties. In this system all Public Administrators are fired by the new political party in office to ensure their ideals and agenda are promoted.
The word that I chose was bureaucrats. The definition of a bureaucrat is a government official who doesn't put the needs of people first. They are more concerned with doing things in the correct order and procedure, even if it is at the expense of the needs of their people.