Civil Unrest
Protests and demonstrations for various incidents and verdicts will continue to be the voice of the public. Unfortunately, they aren’t going anywhere. Usually, it is in response to a particular incident demanding termination, prosecution, letter of resignation, etc. of those involved. Likewise, there could be a reaction to a decision that was made to prosecute or not prosecute. With these demonstrations and protests, law enforcement needs to be trained appropriately to de-escalate or to let them protest if it's nonviolent. As well, you need to ensure that you have an identified person within the department to make sure that the action plan is in place but more importantly they are trained effectively to crowd control methods.
In Douglas N. Husak’s A Moral Right to Use Drugs he attempts to look at drug use from an impartial standpoint in order to determine what is the best legal status for currently illegal drugs. Husak first describes the current legal situation concerning drugs in America, citing figures that show how drug crimes now make up a large percentage of crimes in our country. Husak explains the disruption which this causes within the judicial system and it is made clear that he is not content with the current way drugs are treated. The figures that Husak offers up, such as the fact that up to one third of all felony charges involve drugs, are startling, but more evidence is needed than
It is a clear afternoon, nice and calm, but it is still dusty. My Ma and Pa was trying their best to gain money however it doesn't work out well overall. I sitting in my chair seeing nothing but random winds with dust. Then I suddenly jumped up. A roaring black wave of death came rushing toward me as if it wanted my soul.
Since the beginning of american history there have been peaceful and non peaceful protests. These protests have had valuable effects on American society such as Martin Luther King Jr and Rosa Parks have impacted society greatly and for the better. In my opinion peaceful protests still have negative effects though they are immensely more appropriate than non peaceful protests because peaceful protests often turn violent because people don't know how to act for example Trump Protests.
Reading Henry David Thoreau’s essay Civil Disobedience (1849) I find a parallelism between his thoughts and the coming of age of the United States as a nation. This piece was originally delivered as a speech before the Concord Lyceum in January of 1848 on the subject "On the Relation of the Individual to the State", and published under the title Resistance to Civil Government in Elizabeth Peabody's Aesthetic Papers, in May 1849. Thoreau wrote it from a personal experience: in 1846 he had been imprisoned for not paying his taxes as a protest for the actions of the government because he opposed slavery and the Mexican War. This essay is part of the literary period called The
From its conception, the United States of America has been in a very unique position of being able to develop in any fashion. Under another group of intelligent minds it could have been far different from the democratic-republic that we know it to be today. A key factor in the development of this government was time. Although there would be some civil unrest in the years following the War of Independence, the next major outbreak of violence would not occur until the French Revolution. These circumstances alleviated pressure to establish a strict system of government, and gave the opportunity for trial and error. In examining the early failures of legislation, understanding what was wanted, and what concessions were needed, you can start to
Frankly, how does one physically approve to oppose a law peacefully? We live in a society where the young still protests using words, and by marching. If we take a look at today's current issue of the newly elected President, Donald Trump, we can see that there is still protesters who don't use physical fight contact. They march until the destination and give speeches. It's like they are aiming for a certain audience or a certain person to listen to their speech and make a change towards that. By examining protests that uses peaceful resistance, non-violence and through communication of literature, it's clear that we continue supporting the protesters who have their statements to be made.
There are three solutions that need to be introduced in order to correct the problems caused by protest riots. If police officers change their approach when dealing with protests, there is a smaller chance that a protest will escalate into a riot. Also if there are hidden cameras implanted around the community and inside policer officer uniforms more people will be caught for their actions.If rioters embrace a more peaceful approach toward social injustices, they will be higher regarded by the general public.
As compatriots of the United States, it is our responsibility and commitment to overthrow any type of social or civil injustice. In that process, we as American’s must ensure our rights by practicing a form of civil disobedience. In other words, we should not remain quiet in the roars of prejudice against a certain group of people. Leaders that derive from the civil rights movements like Martin Luther King Jr, Cesar Chavez, Malcolm X, Eleanor Roosevelt, and others have shown us that nothing we want will come into our laps, as humans we must work for the things that we want. In 1950’s through the 1960’s, there was a wave of activist who fought their way to the end of civil injustice, many used their orating skills and others recruited members
The activists feel like this disruptive protest is needed in order to disturb not only the public but to disturb politicians and people in high places. They feel like in this way they will grab the attention, sympathy, and support of citizens and will force politicians to face these issues and propose solutions to them like police reform and will also remind the police force and all other authorities that they are aware of these injustices and that they are never ignored (Mather).
Protesting unjust ideals and unjust treatments has been a part of world history since the first humans walked the Earth. Many people would say that the majority of these protests have bettered the human race and the future of all people. The text, “Waiting for Dan”, takes place in the Civil Rights Movement, where many people were protesting against segregation. The text, “A Letter Home” takes place after a protest against the Vietnam War leads to bloodshed. Although these protests are taking place for different reasons, they can be seen as similar. Then again, they are also drastically different.
“It is so sad, what is happening now,” Linda said in her kitchen while arranging the tea and coffee table. She has white hair, a gaunt face, and a cheerful smile. In the tradition of her religion, Linda wore a black cardigan over a colorful shirt, black pants, and black boots. She added that politics made the world uglier and expressed her worries about her grandchildren’s future.
I recently had the opportunity to interview Jennifer , Human Resource Manager with HCA Physician Services. Jennifer has been with HCA for two years but has been in Human Resources for seven years of which three years in HR management positions. Although she did not have previous experience in the healthcare industry she is highly recommended by her current and former employers. In addition to being a graduate from David Lipscomb with a bachelor's degree in Business Administration, she is also a member of SHRM. A former employee of Uline and Hewitt Associates Jennifer has held positions as benefits coordinator, HR specialist, and most recently as Human Resource Manager. Some of her most important functions are investigating discrimination
Civil disobedience is a timeless practice that has been carried on from generation to generation, from Socrates' refusal to execute Leon of Salamis to today's Syrian rebels' fight for freedom. In many cases of injustice, the public will rise up to reclaim their human rights, and ever so often these fights are nonviolent in nature and educational to all the people who engage in it. However, even in acts of nonviolent demonstrations, both the demonstrator and the demonstrated can be hurt. So the question arises: does peaceful disobedience positively impact a free society? Or does such disobedience only contribute to the tension already apparent? The answer to this question, simply put, is that civil disobedience can positively impact a free society in more ways than one. Peaceful civil disobedience is one of the most important aspects that exemplifies a truly free society, for the ability of a group to protest against injustice is true human freedom. Peaceful demonstrations can also encourage better and stronger livelihood among people who are oppressed, since these actions can and will open the eyes of oppressors, and as a result such
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. once said “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Civil injustice by definition is the unlawful violation of civil rights and these civil injustices that range from discrimination to racism have been going on for decades now and to this day are still going on. In the event that these civil injustices do occur, the citizens that these injustices affect and even those who it doesn’t have the right to stand up and voice their opinion through the act of civil disobedience. I believe that when done correctly, civil disobedience can positively affect a free society. In this essay, I will briefly discuss why civil disobedience is necessary to affect changes in our society that are deemed unfair to a group
Civil disobedience is a form of political participation because it is a way make others see that change is wanted. In the Constitution it says “the right of the people peaceably to assemble”. The Constitution gives the people the right to protest, assemble peacefully, to oppose a law, and to criticize a law. Civil disobedience is the best way to show that you don’t agree with a law, government, or there is something you would like to protest.