Civil War Inevitable Research Paper

America’s transformation into the country we live in today has been formed through numerous events during its short history but the event that will split the United States into North versus South is truly one of the most defining events in American history. Through numerous events leading up to the start of the Civil War, I will attempt to show how the United States was destined for conflict and that the Civil War was inevitable. The first way I will show how the war could not be avoided will deal with the issue of slavery. Slavery should be the first mentioned because many conflicts within the United States leading up to the Civil War and the division of the United States dealt with slavery. The Missouri Compromise should also be talked

Everyone thinks that Abraham Lincoln was America’s most fervent supporter of preserving the Union, but while Lincoln was still a boy, there were three politicians leading the charge to keep the Union from fracturing. These three political giants were celebrities in their time and their names are: Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John C. Calhoun. Their differences ran the gamut and they more often worked against each other than with each other, but each of the men was deeply patriotic and ambitious. They all at one point in their careers served in the Senate and as the Secretary of State. Each of them

The Civil war was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and failures of leadership on both sides. This war was long forthcoming; we see this conflict as a nation divided or as Lincoln put it a house divided (Doc 4). It was a conflict between pro-slavery southerners and anti-slavery northerners. Both sides felt strongly about their position, leading to neither side backing down. However, this war could have been avoided through a compromise of stronger leadership and less extremism.

Calhoun bluntly states in his opening sentence he knew that if something was not done about the abolition of slavery it would end in disunion. He claims to have tried to agitate both parties toward some kind of resolve but to no avail. He then asks Congress the pressing question: “How can the Union be preserved?”

At the end of the Mexican War, lands were ceded to the Union in the West. People from the North and the South were debating over whether or not these lands should have slavery. The solution was pushed by Clay, Webster, and Douglas from the North that would give the new lands the choice to be slave or free depending on a vote. During the mid-1800's, the North was industrializing and populating at a much higher rate than the South which was becoming dependent on the cotton industry. The Compromise of 1850 created more problems than it solved in regards to the enforcement of slave laws, lands in the West, and popular sovereignty.

Throughout American history, the south and the north have consistently held different beliefs on how to handle some subjects. Whether it ranged from slavery, to taxing, or to business, southerners and northerners often seemed to be on opposite sides of the spectrum. It was not any different back in the 1800’s. Though intensely different, they were still part of the same country. One of the biggest issues that made the north and the south so distinct from one another was their view and perspective on slavery. The north, who was considered mostly republican, saw slavery as something that needed to be abolished for it was a great sin committed by mankind; while the south, who were mostly considered democrats, viewed it as a necessity for they considered African-Americans a race that needed to be controlled because they were less intelligent than the white man but very violent and because they were “built” for the hard labor. Over the 1800’s they had been a tension built between the two sides of the country. The tension rose to a boiling point when the 1860 election rolled around. After the elections occurred, a chain of events followed which would leave a lasting impact on the current United States. In the heart of these events was the civil war. To this day, it is very debatable that the war started because of the unsure future of slavery under new leadership.

I think the Civil War became inevitable when Lincoln was elected in 1860. Lincoln believed that slaves should have the right to be free, but the south disagreed with Lincoln. One of the reasons why the civil war started was because of the difference opinions over the free and slave states. The Kansas-Nebraska Act also played a key role in starting the civil war. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed the popular sovereignty to decide which territories would have

In this speech, his last address to the Senate, Calhoun decries the Missouri Compromise and warns of a disruption in the Union if the Southern states were not given full and permanent protection to continue their institutions – namely slavery. He understood with precise clarity that if anti-slavery thought spread throughout the North, then it would only be a matter of time before Civil War erupted between the North and South. A lot of his speech focuses on the incompatibility of the Northern and Southern views on slavery, and suggests that if the South cannot gain equal protection for their slavery system, then the Union should separate into two nations. Clearly stating that " abolition and the Union cannot

In conclusion we had a civil war because of slavery, sectionalism and compromises. Slavery was the big cause because the North said free and South said never!! But then that is what caused sectionalism and the North said better economy and South said never. Then compromises and the North said Never and the South said forever. But then the South later paid for it. The South was not right to secede from anything at

At the time just before the civil war, the Northern states and Southern states were divided into one main issue: slavery. The North tended to HATE slavery and the Abolitionists were common. The South felt threatened by this, because the capital was in the north, and it seemed like the government was completely on the side of the north. Starting with Wilmot’s proviso, which first made southerners think that Congress were abolitionists. Next the Kansas-Nebraska act or bloody Kansas, with both sides getting violent, it just added to the conflict between Northerners and Southerners.

Certainly, the Civil War between the North and South was not inevitable. The North had issued many plans and laws to try to abolish slavery throughout the United States, such as the Free Soil Party. If the North had not tried to completely abolish slavery, then the South may have agreed to some reductions in slavery. After the Missouri Compromise was issued to keep the numbers of slave and free states equal, the North continued to work against the South. Additionally, the idea of popular sovereignty allowed citizens to vote on whether slavery should be abolished. If the government decided for the people about the laws of slavery, it would have settled some arguments. Sometimes people do not know what is right for them and a third party needs

Calhoun, also, believed that the South needed the man power behind the slaves as protection against the Union otherwise they would be weakened. Yet, his strongest argument for slavery was that with the institution everyone in the nation and the world have benefitted from the use of slavery. That without it, the nation wouldn’t have been able to be as strong as it is. When you look towards these two men and their arguments either for or against slavery, one thing is very clear, they both believe that the States should have final words towards the allotment of

The Civil War was inevitable in many reasons. The economic and industrial evolution was mainly in the North side of the United States while the South was just a cotton kingdom, Slave Empire. Also both were completely opposites of one another when it was about freeing the slaves or hiring more. With many debates there has to be sides that would be separated especially if the president has so much hate from the people. With that being said, since many want opposing ideas, the Civil War becomes much evitable.

The only way the South and the North settled the issue of slavery was by the civil war. The civil war was a costly war that resulted in many deaths. The civil war was a fight between the North and the South during Abraham Lincoln's presidency. Abraham Lincoln was an anti-slavery advocate who sought for an anti-slavery nation. After four years of fighting, the North won. The civil war ending the slavery

After thoroughly assessing past readings and additional research on the Civil War between the North and South, it was quite apparent that the war was inevitable. Opposed views on this would have probably argued that slavery was the only reason for the Civil War. Therefore suggesting it could have been avoided if a resolution was reached on the issue of slavery. Although there is accuracy in stating slavery led to the war, it wasn’t the only factor. Along with slavery, political issues with territorial expansion, there were also economic and social differences between North and South. These differences, being more than just one or two, gradually led to a war that was bound to happened one way or another.