Civil War Pros And Cons

Why is there racial tension and political dissension in America? Why did Russia feel its Crimean invasion was justifiable? How did China become an economic power? These questions are answered by a proper understanding of history, helping us to better comprehend the world of 2015. Education’s role needs to be thus: to prepare students as learned individuals and to exist in such an international community. This is why I think history is still incredibly relevant despite focusing on the

James Loewen , a professor of sociology, wrote a book named From Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong, which was published in 1996. In the book, Loewen claims that the American public education system poorly teaches history. He states that this is due to appease and induce overt sense patriotism and nationalism. This leads to the information being false, misleading, boring, and Disneyfied.

In The Death of History is Bunk, Patrick Watson argues that the decrease of historical content in the curriculum does not indicate that history, as a subject, is declining. While many complain about the decreasing prominence of history classes in Canadian schools, the content of those classes is excessively dull as it consists of memorizing lists of facts. Despite this, there are still protests that knowledge of “defining events” is required to contribute to “the National Conversation”. However, history is not so simple as a list of events—it is the sum of the small happenings in society around the events. A whole variety of factors influence history, which is created by the common people. Unlike Americans, who turn to their constitution for

Railroads are not nearly as popular in the United States as they are in European countries. Prior to the American Civil War, railroads were a fairly new, and untried, invention. Compared to carriages and the other modes of transportation at the time, the railroad was far superior. Due to this superiority, they were used to transport soldiers, food, and supplies. A systemic railroad began to spread all across the nation, and both sides of the war used them to their advantage.

Textbooks can be wrong. Is it possible that watching the History Channel could be more informative than the average High School History class? Alia Wong points out in her article History Class and the Fictions about Race in America the topics of underqualified teachers, inaccurate textbooks and the inefficacy of history being taught at all grade levels. I, myself, can attest to this statement having been taught history by a teacher who taught from an extremely outdated textbook. I taught myself by quietly reading in every class. The way we teach history to our children is lacking a few fundamental truths that are essential to American history and how we teach it that underplays

High school history textbooks are seen, by students, as presenting the last word on American History. Rarely, if ever, do they question what their text tells them about our collective past. According to James W. Loewen's Lies My Teacher Told Me, they should be. Loewen has spent considerable time and effort reviewing history texts that were written for high school students. In Lies, he has reviewed twenty texts and has compared them to the actual history. Sadly, not one text measures up to the author's expectation of teaching students to think. What is worse, though, is that students come away from their classes without "having developed the ability to think coherently about social

When it comes to American history , the credibility of our textbooks has been a problem recent years, especially those in high school. And what we are taught in class seem to be far away from our real life. Facing such an irrelevant and boring subject, most high school students have no choice but to suffer the course and struggle for it. The book Lies My Teacher Told Me may account for this phenomenon to some extent.

After the American Revolution, the plantation systems of the south greatly expanded slavery in the United States. The Southern states relied on this slave labor for workers in their fields. This created tension everywhere, politically, economically, and socially. Many felt it was unjust to own a human being and the treatment of these slaves was horrible. These tensions were so strong that it became a major component to the nation-wide crisis, which resulted in the Civil War. Non-slaving holding Americans used forms of anti-slavery agitation to try to persuade slave-holding people to see their side. After the Civil War ended and the abolishment of slavery was put into law, the problem of race was not over. It provided freedom to millions of enslaved Americans and was a major social shift in the United States.

To attain success in any war both sides must conceive a strategy to have victory. In 1861, the armies of both the North and the South trudged off to war. Superior for both sides generated a procedure for victory. Violence throughout the Civil War took setting on three fronts, the East, the West, and the sea. The Union, arranged to obstruction all Southern ports, consequently keeping the South, from exchanging with Europe to cut off the South’s repository of manufactured merchandise. The Union would tackle command of the Mississippi River. This would keep the South from utilizing the river to contribute its soldiers and gash the Southern half, keeping Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas from the repose of the Confederacy. The Union would apprehend the southern capital of Richmond, Virginia where the Confederate government was discovered. The South prepared to fight a protective war. The Confederates wanted to escort the opponent into southern area that is unknown to them and overtire them. The Southerners were relying on help from Europe. They expected European countries would forward money and supplies in trade for cotton. The South wanted to incarcerate the Northern capital of Washington, D.C where the government of the Union was pinpointed. Both the North and South had advantages and disadvantages for winning the Civil War.

The Civil War teaches us the importance of utilizing founding principles for political guidance. President Lincoln summarized the conflict of the Civil War when he stated, “’A house divided against itself cannot stand,’ I believe this government cannot endure permanently, half slave and half free.”

Ivy Ruhlen POLS 29 April 2015 Lies My Teacher Told Me Lies My Teacher Told Me, by James Loewen displays an incongruous way of presenting history to today’s generations of high school students of American history. They are being given a false perspective on how past history truly happened, which is giving them a warped understanding of the past, present, and future. Leaving history to repeat itself by unknowing, uncaring, and uninterested individuals. By choosing to omit or forget the true obstacles of the past the present and future are a placed at risk of being an echo. Loewen’s book truly brings out all the false pretenses that we are set up with from the beginning of our learning years that can only harm our worldly understanding when we

In James Loewen’s book, Lies My Teacher Told Me, he talks about misconceptions in America school textbooks. Are these actually misconceptions though? What is the author saying about American history when details or whole event are untold? Lowen delves into these deep topics head on and gives examples as he goes. This book is not only intended for those who have read an American history book, but for those who have never heard the truth. Lowen wrote this book in order to uncover and educate; furthermore, this is important because events never told are now brought to light. Using detailed information concerning racism, governmental over watch, and the Vietnam War the author argues that the American history textbook has covered up things in

Jefferson favored a small militia where states could govern it and he wanted to rely on them as much as possible, without involving a standing army. For citizens, a militia seemed much favorable because they didn’t hold much power and these were volunteer forces who were not paid a salary (sometimes received items for their service,) therefore the taxes of the people, didn’t heavenly contribute to them. According to Fred Anderson, often in battles, provincials often had to prove themselves, that they were capable of meeting expectations of professional regulars. Militias were seen as property holding citizens that would protect people when threatened, and even sacrificing their lives to protect liberty. Militia units took pride in being a virtuous

“Is it true that long ago firemen put out fires instead of going to start them?” This further shows how people are seeing the true past as almost an urban legend rather than a fact showing that the past is just a remnant of history and is beyond recognizable as the society as a whole besides a select few believe the life that they are living always has been this way. This is very similar to the saying “History is written by the victors”(Winston Churchill) in the sense that throughout a majority of civilizations the story is different of what happened and who is the wrong or right when discussing that civilizations past. Such as the history of America where to us they came to America to be free and fight for their freedoms. Where on the side of the native americans side they were foreign invaders that took their land and disrespected their culture even making the natives travel across America as prisoners on what is known as the Trail of Tears.

The American Civil War was the bloodiest war in American history. This war took place from 1861-1865. About 620,000 Americans died in the Civil War, almost 300,000 more than any other war ("American Civil War"). This was due to the fact that Americans were the only people to die in the war. The American Civil War was the only major war to take place on American soil because it was the United Sates versus the United States. There were two very different sides, the Confederates of the South and the Union of the North, but nevertheless, every soldier was an American. The North ended up on top at the end of the war because of all the assets they had that the Confederates did not. Did the South have a chance at winning or did the North already have too many advantages for it to be a fair fight? Many reasons like the social life, the booming economy, the powerful military, the surplus of resources and especially the advanced technology made it very tough for the South to have a chance at winning the Civil War. The fact that the North had the advanced technology was the deciding factor that lead the Union to victory in the United States Civil War. With all of these advantages it is easy to see why the South did not have much of a chance at winning the Civil War.