Clare V. Facebook Case Summary

Consequently, by conducting these actions, we are taking away their first amendment right. The value of the first amendment right is really grandiose and perhaps the most crucial right to have. For instance, the first amendment right has shaped the U.S.A to be distinctive from other countries. The first amendment gave everyone, not just common people, the entitlement to freely express themselves. However, with social media watching and judging their every move, it's hard to be a part of everyday life. Even going to the supermarket might have to require a distortion for the media. It's as though celebrities are being trapped in a prison. This is unjust because they never signed a contract agreeing to surrender their lives for the public. It's as if we are making people , who give up their privacy, like robots and force these "robots" to be on top of a cliff overlooking embarrassment and fear. All these people ever asked was to be open to public about his or her talent, not giving up their invaluable privacy. According to (Source A), it states,"It seems somewhat unfair to say that because a person's gift lies in acting, basketball, or singing, rather than, for example, engineering, architecture, or computer science, that he or she has somehow " chosen " to give up all of his or

How Facebook Marketing is Violating Consumer Privacy The marketing industry is an elaborate network that links companies to their consumers, primarily through written communication. The main objective of marketing is to identify trends and patterns in consumer behavior, and utilize the data to influence consumers to purchase more goods. From a macroenviroment standpoint, the general conditions of a market are heavily dependent on global environmental factors. The most significant factor that influences the markets today is technological advancements. Since the release of Facebook, Linked-in, Twitter, and Myspace in the early 2000s, the number of people using social media has increased to over sixty-five percent. The ever-growing dependency on social media platforms, has given marketers the tremendous opportunity to further market potential consumers. Social media marketing is a specific form of marketing that focuses on producing ad content that social media users will post on their own networks. This particular marketing technique is effective because ads and content are created, based on what personal information users post on social media. Firms and organizations that advertise their brands on social media are more likely to increase their customer base and annual revenue. By doing so, companies are able to increase exposure of their brand and widen previous hidden, customer bases. As a marketer, the fine line between right and wrong is often blurred. The amount and

With the idea of humans as autonomous beings with dignity, philosopher Immanuel Kant would agree that all moral agents should value privacy and individuality for themselves and others. When social media companies take sensitive and personal information to gain profit, it would be treating people as merely a means to an end. Without authority of consent, it would infringe on a person’s privacy and would not treat the person with the respect one deserves as a rational human being. To treat social network users with respect means they should be treated as people as ends in themselves and not as bits and pieces of information to be used. Furthermore, the categorical imperative would say that it is immoral to intrude into another person’s private life on social media without permission or in secret. Because Kant insists that the morality of a maxim depends on whether we can allow it to be a universal law,

IT 210 - Business Systems Analysis and Design Introduction The privacy of human being has drastically changed with the advent of internet. On a scale of 1 to 10, the privacy of an internet user is a -1 or may be less. Social Networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace etc are mainly

The article Facebook’s Unethical Experiment was written by Katy Waldman. The article states that Facebook manipulated the news feeds of users to study “emotional contagion through social networks.” Researchers manipulated the posts users would see on their timelines to see if the user’s own posts would be impacted. Essentially, Cornell and the University of California in San Francisco tested whether reducing the number of positive messages people read on their news feeds made those people less likely to post positive posts.

There is an article about Facebook allowing people to view other’s personal information. This right is protected by the U.S. constitution through the 4th Amendment. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly

However, this new Facebook’s feature can be backfired because Facebook invades users’ privacy. Many users felt like their privacy was completely infiltrated, just about everything users updated or changed was instantly blasted out to hundreds of friends. News Feed has kept all the users’ information “loud”, and allowed people to see pictures and posts, which could give out information that users might not want their friends to know. Users claim that News Feed features leave the door open for people to 'creep'. “Facebook has always tried to push the envelope” (p.545) and “Everyone is freaking out” (p.544). Using people’s first reaction to the Facebook’s “News Feed” feature, Thompson later explains the privacy problem that this new feature may have caused. Thompson tries to inform the readers both side of the benefits and disadvantages using Facebook. The author creates a great connection with the readers by doing so, makes the readers feel that he’s on the same with them, that he understands the whole circumstances.

In early common law, right of privacy simply meant the right to left alone from prying eyes ( ). However, over time common law found that invasion of privacy can also occur when a person, “appropriates to his own use of benefit the name or likeness of another is subject to liability to the other” ( ). Under common law, the misappropriation of someone’s name, image, and likeness must meet four elements: 1) the defendant’s use of the plaintiff’s identity, 2) the appropriation of plaintiff’s name or likeness to defendant’s advantage commercially or otherwise, 3) lack of consent, and 4) a resultant injury ( ).

Before I read Danah Boyd's essay, I was confused with the title "Viewing American class divisions through Facebook and MySpace." I was thinking how American class (in school) divided by these social networks, but now I understand that she was talking about social class. Her content was abundant that she

Facebook is a well know social networking site that has taken all over the world with over 500 million people using the site. Social networking sites such as Facebook share information about the user over the Internet, where it can be freely accessed by anyone. This is where issues of privacy to the individual arise. As of July 2010 Facebook has more than 500 million active users, Users may create a personal profile, add other users as friends and exchange messages, including automatic notifications when they update their profile. As of December last year, Facebook called its 500 million users to review their privacy settings at the launch of its new user control tools which allow the user to control their information easily depending on

Ashlyn Averett World Lit. Bass 4.23.15 Paparazzi As citizens of the United States, we have the right to safety, privacy and freedom of self-expression. Halle Berry, Sandra Bullock and lots of other celebrities pay a steep price to be in the public’s eye. Some would argue that the price they pay is their loss of privacy. “Paparazzi can both work as freelancers and sell their photographs to magazines or online sites, or they can for agencies” (Murray 5). The public’s interest to celebrity exploitation has become increasingly avid in the past decade. Many paparazzi have tried to justify their behavior by saying that as long as people are going to pay for the magazines and view the websites; they will continue to take the picture. With little to no help from the judicial system, celebrities have had to take measures into their own hands by filing law suits or

Data privacy activist Max Schrems has successfully led a lawsuit against Facebook to the Austrian Supreme Court while the social media company also faces a privacy complaint from the Belgian Privacy Commission (BPC). Schrems hopes that the lawsuit would be accepted as a class action case as the Viennese lawyer attracted

Privacy Issues in Social Media Social Media is a current way in which people are using to interact with one another daily. Since the launch of various Social Networking Sites (SNS) its been a huge attraction in a new way to share information with others and correspond with interests of your choice in many different forms. Although social media sites allow users to share information with friends and other sites on the internet, many people are unaware of how their privacy is getting out. Now that the expansion of global connection through these social media networking sites are so highly present in todays society, giving us easy access to information, the lack of one's privacy is being diminished. Everyday peoples privacy rights are

Going along with the privacy issue, some people feel that they no longer want to share personal things with their Facebook friends. Often times, their friends are people that they barely know, whether they went to high school together or they may be a friend of a friend. Users feel that these people do not need to know all of the intimate details of their lives. The same CNN article tells a story about a couple who deleted their accounts in order to reestablish past

Social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook have created a new ethical dilemma for many businesses. Corporations, small businesses, and even universities are struggling create policies to manage their employees social networking behaviors. Social networking access, particularly for recruiters, can provide personal information about potential employees, which would otherwise not be available. A business must follow statutes and guidelines when disclosing information to the public. Individuals on social networking sites have no such constraints. Employees can and do make comments about their employers online. Employers can and do watch what employees post online. Any individual can send or post potentially damaging information