Classical Approach Of Management Based On Their Type Of Business And Their Operation

Organizations and businesses alike all have managers and management styles that they abide by. Some may be company policy; while others seem to be implemented by the manager’s themselves. In this paper, three different management styles are explained; Scientific, human relations, and systems management styles. All have been used in different organizations, and some are still used today. In order for a business to effectively succeed in their goals, a certain management style needs to be used.

Management styles are wide and varied across the entire world of work. The specific type of management that works for one particular set of workers does not always work for another group of employees. Almost everyone has come into direct contact with a manager at some point in their careers. It is the relationship between the employee and the manager that must be keenly developed; in order for an office, factory, restaurant, or similar organization to run smoothly and effectively. When an organization is being managed efficiently, workers are much more upbeat, production levels are optimal, and the overall working environment has a fragrance of positivity. In sharp contrast, when an organization is ineffectively managed, more times than

Although no single management style can be classified as perfect, one has to experiment by mixing many styles together in an attempt to come as close to perfection as possible.

Management has experienced remarkable shifts in the way that organizations conduct business particularly in the last century, due to the evolving workplace as well as tremendous changes in the roles of leaders in organizations. Early managers often relied on authoritative tactics to get the job done, which we have learned from history does not work very well for many modern organizations. In this paper, I will be analyzing the management approach my organization takes and whether this is the best approach to meet organizational goals and whether or not my organization may benefit from adopting a different approach or combining multiple approaches.

Managerial styles vary from company to company and can influence the morale of the employees as well as its customers. It is important to apply

Throughout history, literature in corporate management evolved from basic classical theories of production, pricing and resource-management in the 19th century into more complex models in the 20th century, that incorporated studies into the human aspect of leadership. The first notable literature in this area is often regarded to be Adam Smith’s ‘Wealth of Nation’s’, which addressed organisational efficiency and the allocation of labour. Famous literature in the 19th century had many theoretical frameworks (including technical guidance), that were carried forward to the formalised structure of the ‘Classical Approach’ that we know today. Literature within the recent century built upon these theories, leading to the development of the scientific approach in management theory and the HR approach. In this essay we will examine each approach objectively in an effort to find if the above question holds true.

All the processes within an organization should be planned and carried out in a way that they would not only support the strategies but the business vision as well. In case that the processes aren't planned in a manner that they would support the goals of the firm they can not only reduce the productivity of the firm but can also face the risk of being terminated (Carr, 1996; Gouillart, 1995; Gareth, 2006).

The Classical Management Theory entered the business world in the early nineteenth century, with an emphasis on increasing worker productivity. Developed by Frederick Taylor, the classical theory of management advocated a scientific study of tasks and the workers responsible for them. It was the foundation of many modern management theories and it aimed to improve operations within an organization. The Classical Management Theory was broken into three schools of thinking: Scientific management, which looked at 'the best way ' to do a job; Bureaucratic management, which focused on rules and procedures, and Administrative management, which emphasized om the flow of information within the organization. One theorist, Henri Fayol, was an

Management styles are a set of skills that appear in divergent traits. Many organizations worldwide have clung onto the authoritative management for centuries. This category of management is known as the “do as I say manager, and seldom accepts input from their team. For an association to generate revenue, all employees must feel some sort of importance.

The Industrial Revolution brought about the classical perspective in management from which the emphases on the productivity and efficiency was developed based on the entire efficiency of employees in organizations. The focus was not based on the attributes of human or their behaviour but in differences between them (Anon., 2009)in the workforces. Human fault and performance where not taken into consideration, so the classical approach was regularly criticized for overlooking the requests and needs of workers in the workplace. But the classical approach was heavily inspired by processes of developmental operations.

It can be argued that the success of any business is dependent on the effectiveness of management. It is expected that managers will make good decisions and will exploit the business’ strengths to gain future opportunities while correcting internal weaknesses in order to protect the business from both internal and external threats. Below is a presentation of the management style of

Managers are expected to do a multitude of things. A manager has to be a visionary and adaptive to meet the current demands of what is required of them at all level

Every person brings a new management style with them to the positions. However, not all managing styles are effective for a well ran organization with good employees. Some aspects of a good manager are one who empowers their employees, motivates them, and in today’s work climate protect the staff from bullies. Along with personal issues that managers deal with in libraries, new technologies are introduced quickly. Managers are responsible for staff training on the new technology and creating new policies for the technology.

The definition of ‘management’ is controversial and subject to much debate. There have been many contradictory views on what the term ‘management’ means and accordingly how one should correctly manage an organisation. These theories have been put forward by several highly regarded management scholars over time. By taking into account past knowledge and contemporary views on management, we are able to ‘’explore how thinking has changed through time’’. (Brooks, 2006). Moreover, businesses have, and can continue to be able to adapt these theories and put them into practice. Successfully applying correct management practices is especially vital in a global business environment which is becoming very competitive. ‘’Most management theories, even those that do not resonate comfortably with the prevailing mood, have attractive and valid elements to them.’’ (Robinson, 2005). For example, some of these theories can be seen flourishing in fast food chains like McDonalds.

French mining engineer, Henri Fayol graduated in 1860. He later became the director-general of Comambault, a company who was at the verge of bankruptcy. Fayol successfully reformed the company into one of the largest industrial combines of Europe after his retirement. Fayolism or Administrative theory was developed in 1900s with the focus that management should be considered as an essential skill of life and should be separated from any technical knowledge. He believed that everyone perform certain administrative functions in their everyday lives (Lynch and Robert G., 2013). The theory emphasizes that the success of an organization was determined by the administrative ability of its leader as oppose to their technicality.