Classical Tradition And The Classical Era

1139 Words Dec 14th, 2014 5 Pages
The classical tradition in the medieval times has an articulate work of art should stand by itself without the need of interpretation. As one literally scholar would state, the classical era states that interpretation is ambiguous, and “does not always prevail”. Yet, now in our society, art’s interpretation can be one or all: a parody, an abstract, a pastiche, or non-art.
Pain and suffering constituted things with which for him to identify. His own family had made a grueling transition from the war and turmoil ravaged areas of Prussia (now Czech) Although many of his works have become instantly recognizeable, famous in their own right, the distinct themes of the classical tradition’s work have no direct meaning. The classical tradition’s work was tied in with the explosion of visual
The classical tradition created a corollary to contemporary visual culture, which was branded by and transmitted through the use of avant-garde. It is evident from his creative output that for the classical tradition, death and disaster were leitmotifs and underlying themes. The classical tradition’s work does not lend itself to any sense of interpretation, only the themes of fame and tragedy. Susan Sontag states: “To avoid interpretation, art may become parody.” The classical tradition’s work is technically a flight from interpretation, and can be seen very much in the light of parody. Indeed, interpretation does not necessarily prevail.
The classical tradition was an artist who…
Open Document