Classical and Neoclassical Economists: Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes

Milton Friedman and John Keynes are two world renowned economist, with many similar and contrasting views that have helped set the foundation of our economy. Friedman 's ideology on subjects such as the Monetary Policy, Gold Standard, and the Theory of the consumption function are what made him a extremely impactful economist. Keynes has made his impact on the modern day world as well in many aspects. Both of these economists have helped pave the way to a better, more efficient economy.

Economics is the study of choice and the consequences that come from said choices. Ever since the 18th century, economists have continued to argue about theories that could improve society to the greatest extent. Two great economists, Adam Smith and Karl Marx, proved to develop opposing ideologies that would soon become the foundation of the two most popular political philosophies. Even though they voiced opposing views, Smith and Marx have truly made the greatest impact on contemporary economic theory in the United States because without them, our capitalist economy would not be what it is today.

Even though he shares some of the same ideas as the three men, Adam Smith’s ideas are most similar to John Locke. Both Locke and Smith believed people can be trusted and let people do their own things, without having the government interfere. This concept is called by Adam Smith, laissez faire. Smith thought that this would help protect society, administer justice, and provide public works. Even though Smith’s philosophies were the same on government as Locke, his views on economy were a lot like Marx’s. Both Smith and Marx believed that the economy had a major role in government and that it is important to industrialize. He believed that people should seek out wherever the demand for goods and services are to have an effective economy. Also, Adam Smith’s concept on a particular leader keeping everything going and orderly was a lot like Thomas Hobbes idea. They both believed that there needs to be someone watching out for the people just in a case of emergency, when foreigners attack. Even though Smith did not have the same exact views as Locke, Marx or Hobbes, Smith’s ideas were along the lines of these

Smith advocated for free trade for a country. A country should export more than it imports. This stimulates the growth of the economy. Adam Smith was an optimist who sought the best for his country.

Smith believed that self, self-interest, and self-determination, all were mechanisms where individuals are motivated to gain wealth and power for individual gain and group gain. Smith believed that ‘self' is a matrix of reason and passion (Levine, 1998). Furthermore, Smith believed that sympathy leads to empathy, and our individual self-determination leads to accumulation of wealth that benefits others as well as us (Levine, 1998). Examples of this concept are evident in our current economic society today. We see Bill Gates and Microsoft providing technology to communicate more efficiently, Henry Ford's posterity changing the transportation market, and many others who impact man with their accumulation of wealth.

Among economists, it is said Adam Smith is one of the main contributors to modern free market economics. His thoughts attacked mercantilism which was the prevalent form of government at the time. His works provided systematic rationales in the subjects of capitalism, free markets, and limited government intervention. His most popular books changed history because without them, many of these thoughts and ideas would not be so prevalent. Smith is regarded and cited as the father of modern economics. With this said, not all of Smith’s ideas were in agreement with laissez-faire. Although Adam Smith pioneered many ideas on modern free market economics, Smith cannot be depicted as a defender of laissez-faire because of his ideas on

Adam Smith lived during the Age of Enlightenment in mid-eighteenth century Europe. The Enlightenment heavily influenced Adam Smith’s thoughts on economics. The numerous problems related to the dominate economic system of mercantilism along with novel concepts of independence and inherent rights of men lead Smith to his laissez-faire philosophies. On the other hand, Karl Marx witnessed the extreme economic disparages of his time. The European, economic status-quo of prior centuries created a system where the overwhelming majority of

Adam Smith born the year 1723 was thought to be one of the world’s greatest economists. In Fact he was known as the father of economy. He was also known by the way he thought and the way he wrote about the country's economy and in this paper I will explain the way he described and the way he thought of the economy and why his thoughts have carried on for the last two hundred years.

Since the early days of the United States, the Founding Fathers and other brilliant minds sought ways to understand and make sense of the inner workings of society and the economic market. Out of the many thinkers and developers of that time period, perhaps none made so great an impact on American society as the Scottish contemporary philosopher and political economist, Adam Smith—who is most known for his influential work, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, By the early nineteenth century, other streams of economic theory emerged from various individuals who were also influenced by the ideas of Smith. Some of these individuals included David Ricardo, Karl Marx and later John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman—each of whom contributed their own ideas on economic activity. However, it was Smith’s ideas on capitalism and his laissez-faire approach to free markets that have transcended other economic theories and continue to impact American economic thought to this day.

Why is the work of Adam Smith considered so crucial in the development of economic thought?

There is perhaps not a more famous ongoing dialectic argument in the field of political economy than the one between Adam Smith and Karl Marx in regards to capitalism. The two thinkers, although coming to radically different conclusions about the outcomes of the capitalist system for all parties involved, agree on a surprising number of ideas such as labor being the source of commodities’ value, as well as the fact that the division of labor increases productivity. However, their different conceptions of what determines the price of a commodity, the driving force behind and the effects of the division of labor, and the purpose of the capitalist system have widespread implications that cause their holistic arguments to diverge considerably.

Peet and Hartwick’s central argument is that neoclassical economist’s theories favored the bourgeoisie. Economists believe that the bourgeoisie should control the economy for the good of everyone.

Adam Smith is considered as one of the most influential economists in the 18th century. Although his theories have been criticized by several socialist economists, however, his idea of capitalism still has great impact to the rest of the economists during classical, neo classical periods and the structure of today’s economy. Even the former Prime Minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher had praised on Smith’s contribution on today’s capitalism market. She commented “Adam Smith, in fact, heralded the end of the strait-jacket of feudalism and released all the innate energy of private initiative and enterprise which enable wealth to be created on a scale never before contemplated” (Copley and Sutherland 1995, 2). Smith is also being recognized

Adam Smith but rather, expanded the theory based on the Great Depression. They were both

Other important classical economists include David Ricardo who introduced and developed the concepts of comparative advantage and the