Classroom Controversy Analysis

Technology has improved the human species by providing information around the world, leading to developments in different countries. Biotechnology is improving the world of medicine, agriculture, and energy production. In the medical world, technology has a big impact by helping scientists and doctors figure out how to fight off diseases and viruses. For example, there are two individuals, one who has malaria and the other has built up a resistance to malaria. Knowing that an individual has built up resistance to malaria can help, simply by taking a sample of their blood

Computers and technological devices have been heavily used in millions of elementary classrooms throughout the world. While many people believe this is a beneficial thing some think it is taking over the traditional ways of learning and damaging their social interaction. All the colors and sounds on the screen attract children and make them think that what they are learning is fun and enjoyable. Using computers in the classroom is very beneficial, but it should not be replacing traditional ways of education. As Elizabeth Bohnhorst, author of Floppy Disk Fallacies, stated “…computers are being used more and more frequently as a substitute for books, blackboards, and in some cases, the teachers themselves (251-252)”. Students will soon not have the need to bring pencils, paper, and even a backpack to class because everybody will be using computers as a means of learning. Moreover, computers should be used only as a tool to assist learners and make certain tasks accomplishable more efficiently while also keeping traditional ways of learning.

In the article "Can Students Have Too Much Tech?" Susan Pinker explains the pros and cons of technology in the classroom. Her argument is supplemented by Studies from Duke University and Stanford University. She also utilized the history of the One Laptop per child nonprofit, along with her own research and opinions.

Even though some parents and teachers might disagree with Pinker’s argument, they all give credibility to the figures from which the evidence came from. In the beginning, economists Jacob Vigdor and Helen Ladd from Duke University, conducted an experiment to show the effects of a student’s academics when they were offered their own computers. Unfortunately, the results they received back were not up to par with the students’ previous scores. Further in, Larry Cuban, an emeritus education professor at Stanford, states that he agrees with Pinker’s view on the matter, describing technology as a novelty to a child’s education. He says, “It’s true that there is often an initial uptick in students’ engagement with their studies-interactive apps can be fun. But the novelty wears off after a few a few months.” Lastly, Randy Yerrick, a professor of education at the University of Buffalo, addresses his opinion on the matter. He says that technology in classrooms is, “worth the investment only when it’s perfectly suited to the task, in science simulations, for example, or to teach students with learning disabilities.” Given these points, it is clear that Pinker’s audience can give credibility to the speakers found in her editorial. Thanks to the interviewees’ highly educated backgrounds, parents and teachers can trust and believe in what they are saying on

Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to become angry. James 1:19. I think this means everyone should listen closely, not be in a hurry and rush yourself, and not be really snippy with someone fastly. This Bible verse can be taken in a lot of ways. It can be taken in a cautious note, a scary note, and even a serious note. I think that is mostly meaning be quick to obey but don’t get too angry. There are a lot of ways you can use this in a classroom. First, just be quiet in general if you can do it at your house you sure can do it in a classroom! Secondly, just listen to the teachers it’s not that hard all you have to do is pay attention. Even if the class really Hoover’s and you really just don’t like the class in general

I think schools shouldn't ban dyed hair because it shows creativity as stated in the article. Also, people say it is distracting but it isn't because people focus on the teacher or their work. Schools shouldn't ban dyed hair because kids want to be creative. That is why schools shouldn't ban dyed

Because I wanted to inspire my students, did not mean that I had magnificent experiences, and I was exempted from classroom controversies. If the truth be known, I had astronomical challenges. I kid you not, there were days when my human strength was siphoned-out, and the disparity caused me to voluntarily end a few of my assignments.

Technology is everywhere, it is involved in almost every part of our culture. It affects how we live, work, play, and most importantly learn. With technology being such a fundamental part of our lives and growing each day, it only makes sense that schools incorporate technology in the classrooms. Even though many people support the use of technology in schools, there are those that have concerns about the effectiveness of technology and whether or not it undermines education to solely prepare students for the workforce. Despite the concerns, technology is being integrated with classroom lessons daily, and proving how beneficial it is for student success.

Are computers helpful to a child’s learning process or do they completely ruin it? Many people have a strong opinion on technology and using it in schools. Parents, educators and students all have different views on the topic. Some people believe that it is unnecessary to use technology in schools, and who encourage traditional teaching and hands on learning; others believe that technology is enticing the children and putting forth an engaging way of presenting information. Many schools are going towards the direction of including technology as an effective tool used for their curriculum, but there still needs to be a hands on aspect to introduce the children to new experiences. Education should be a mixture of technology and hands on; traditional teaching needs to be balanced to create a complete connection needed for the real world for children in school.

Armstrong and Casement (2003) assume classroom problems will only be exacerbated by more extensive or more creative use of computers in the classroom, while there are studies that show this does not necessarily have to be the case. Many teachers have found computers to be an effective tool to increase student participation and performance. They point to effective teachers for the solution, but their supporting evidence against computer usage is not conclusive. While there may be problems with using computers appropriately in the classroom, it is uncertain whether continuing

In the beginning, before laptops and tablets were ever invented, paper was used. We would use paper for almost everything, but now that the human race has become more technologically advanced, we now look for new ways to educate people that will be more effective and will motivate students to embrace this change and make the learning experience fun. Evidence has shown that laptops and tablet programs in the computer environment that is created on campus has had a huge positive effect on students (Fried) (2008:904). According to Fitch (2004), laptop usage helps communication between lecturers and students, therefore in class participation is higher, thus increasing active learning and engagement among students. This is done by preparing and posting questions that students can do on their laptops and tablets. A good example of this is Ulink, lecturers post information and activities for students to participate in, whereby when they done can simply print it and submit. A demonstration was done by Barak, Lipson, and Lerman (2006), showing that the usage of Laptops and Tablet devices in a Wi-if classroom enhances active exploratory learning, and promotes a more meaningful interaction between students and lecturers. When compared to non-laptop classrooms to classrooms that do use laptops a report has shown a higher participation rate, higher levels of motivation and students are more interested in learning (Trimmel.,et. al,

It is no secret that technology is starting to take over many parts of daily routines. As a future educator I have seen how technology has creeped into daily routines in classrooms. It is standard that classrooms are equipped with a desktop computer, a tablet for the teacher, a smartboard, classroom desktops, laptops, or tablets. Should technology be incorporated into classrooms as much? Specifically, my research paper will examine the cons of replacing textbooks with tablets. While technology can be helpful in a classroom setting, we should stick to old ways and keep textbooks around. By exclusively using tablets in place of textbooks, we must accept issues such as cost, maintenance for the tablets, training to use tablets and the technological problems, how compatible the apps are for each brand of tablet, health concerns, touching on all of the different learning styles, distractions in the classroom, and suggestions of what to do instead of replace textbooks with tablets. There are many factors to take into consideration before making such an immense update to the learning process. School technology coordinators should reevaluate this transition because it affects the students, teachers, and the school as a whole.

schools reporting they are likely to do so in the future. In addition to this, many schools have begun to integrate one to one initiatives into their classrooms. This initiative provides a device, such as a laptop, to each student for their use at school or at home. Finally, according to a study done by the National Center for Educational Statistics, “American children between the ages of 9 and 17 use technology more than any other age group” (Gillard & Bailey, 2007, p.87). We, as educators of a new generation, must realize that we have students who have been raised with technology at their fingertips. Our students have grown up in a world immersed with technology. Many schools have been fighting against the use of technology in the classroom. However, schools are starting to recognize that our current generation of students who learn in a different

The other half (control group) had a teacher that allowed their laptops to be used but did not involve the use of the web-based material as part of the class. The final report showed that more students responded to the use of computers in the classroom and said that it helped them engage during class and learn more. However, 75% of the students from the total group of the sixteen courses admitted that having the computer in the classroom had allowed them more opportunity to be distracted and do irrelevant class activities like checking social media. Also, 40% from the uncontrolled and 46% of the control group reported that they felt somewhat distracted by their peer’s computers (Zhu).

Computers today are a necessity for educational purposes. A computer should be placed in every classroom, but unfortunately not every school can currently afford to integrate all of its classrooms. Many teachers who are currently using technology find that it can help them to improve student learning while increasing children’s motivation to learn. It caters to children’s various learning styles and their special needs.