In the matter of clean-coal technologies, Alex supported his position better. His information was all relevant to the discussion and his reasoning was sound and free of fallacies.
First, Alex included only relevant information related to clean-coal burning technology itself, while Oscar side-tracked the conversation to include environmental impact by the coal industry prior to burning it. Secondly, this also constitutes a non-sequitur fallacy, because the fact that coal extraction may cause environmental concerns, does not negate Alex' argument that coal can now be burned in a cleaner, safer manner.
In conclusion, by staying on point and the using good logic and sound reasoning, Alex became the winner of this
The pollution is leaving our footprint rate out of control! Knowing that they have gotten rid of all the coal generators is a big reduction of the ecological footprint. Without the generators burning off the coal, the pollution will stay at a lower rate causing the footprint to decrease. It is more sustainable now than before because our city doesn't have to worry about trying to maintain the pollution levels as much as we used to and we can focus on more of the major projects.
Oscar starts off by stating "Coal, the source of half the energy in the United States, has been dirtiest of all fossil fuels because it creates harmful emissions when burned." He goes on to talk about the new technologies that are being developed of clean ways to use coal. These technological advances "purify exhaust gasses as coal burns" which are called wet scrubbers. Low NOx burners prevent harmful emissions from happening in the first place. There is even a process called gasification, which avoids burning coal to
They are the similar because they both produce energy they both make at least 1 type of energy, wind makes electricity and coal makes electricity generation. Coal and wind energy have been around for a long time, lots of people use coal and wind energy a lot for electricity and electricity generation.
My Citation Bobby Magill, the senior science writer at Climate Central, implies that, “Signs of coal’s decline are written all over the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s annual coal report released this week, showing that despite a slight increase in coal consumption in 2013, coal production is down and coal mining jobs are down”
My Aunt, Janice James, lived on the most beautiful piece of land in Knoxville, Tennessee, on the Emory River. You could see why she and her husband chose to live here for so many years, it was picturesque. It was picturesque until December of 2008 when the TVA’s Kingston Fossil Plant led to the biggest coal-ash spill in history. TVA uses coal to develop ‘cleaner’ electricity for the communities surrounding. They may claim to have bettered the community, but years later, it is still devastating that Janice James lost her home and will never be able to visit the gorgeous piece of land she called home for so long. This event was one of the biggest tragedies Janice had faced, but she was able to move on and find another
Coal and natural gas are the United States’ main fossil fuels used as energy sources. These fossil fuels both contain mixtures of hydrocarbons, which is a chemical compound of carbon and hydrogen (Olah, 2005). Currently, fossil fuels provide eighty-five percent of commercial energy, such as businesses, worldwide and this eighty-five percent does not even account for residential use. Imagine if the residential energy use was accounted for in that eighty-five percent (Davison, 2007). According to Goodell (2006), “Between 1950 and 2000, the world population increased by 140 percent and fossil fuel consumption increased by 400 percent. By 2030, the world’s demand for energy is expected to more than double,” with most of the electricity
Details on why winner won & Details on why loser lost. In the argument for clean coal it states it does cause harmful emission when burned but with new technology to clean the residue that it can reduce coal environmental impacts. It "purifies" exhaust gases as coal burns( wet scrubbers) and they prevent harmful emissions in the first place. The author for this argument gives out actual facts and does admit to the faults that are there but it doesn't state that the new technologies aren't affective, and he stays on topic of what the matter is than rather
The development of science and technology has led to people considering using alternative fuels to generate electricity. There are many alternative fuels that can generate electricity, such as natural gas, nuclear energy, wind energy, hydraulic power and so on (Fossil Fuels Used to Generate Electricity Power Plant Emissions of North America). According to the statistics by the U.S. Energy Information Administration in 2009, the usage of coal was still the largest source to generate the power. Sources of electricity in the United States were generated by 44.9% of coal, 20.3% of nuclear, 23.4% of natural gas, 1% of petroleum, 6.9% of hydroelectric conventional and 3.6% of others (Electric Power Monthly with Data for February 2014). Coal
Two attitudes of successful critical thinking, risk-taking, and creativity, when combined are considered crucial for patient self-care advocacy. With creativity, one can find environmental, social, and clinical solutions outside of the usual standards of practice to help the patient achieve Orem ’s idea of self-care independence (Potter, Perry, Stockert & Hall, 2015). For example, when a patient who received partially compensatory care reveals to the nurse that he feels comfortable conducting an act of self-care that he was unable to previously achieve, the nurse must show risk-taking and creativity to encourage a supervised demonstration of the task. Acts of support such as these allow the patient to develop “self-care confidence” which is
Clean coal is the emission of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases which arise from coal application. (Fan, 2008) This process is usually used for electrical power generation using clean coal technology. Clean coal pumps and stores carbon dioxide emissions underground by using the integrated gasification combined cycle. Coal gasification is the main process in the integrated gasification combined cycle. The integrated gasification combined cycle increases efficiency and lowers cost in capturing carbon dioxide emissions. (Fan, 2008)
In Julie Kerr Casper’s nonfiction book Fossil Fuels and Pollution: The Future of Air Quality, the collective societal acceptance of alternatives to human labor is argued as one of the most prevalent factors contributing to climate change since the Second Industrial Revolution. Such alternatives during this period included the burning of fossil fuels, which were burned to produce electricity, to heat and cool buildings, and to power machines. The idea of burning coal seemed to be a somewhat appealing alternative to human labor at the time, and as technology advanced, more products were developed to replace human labor (Casper 66). Casper demonstrates that although the discovery of burning coal meant more efficiency
I sat quietly in the large van. Everyone was quiet. We were swaying back and forth as the car rounded each bend, moving with the mountain. The car slowly climbed up, revealing more peaks. I took in the atmosphere with every breath. The mountain rose and fell like sand dunes. Fog blanketed the mountaintop illuminating the green tree tops and emphasizing the dark leaves of others. The van continued in peace. As we swung around one last corner, the silence was broken and a unified gasp filled the vehicle. Our sight was stolen. The utopian mountaintop was replaced with flat, gray, barren land. The passengers were shocked and the murmurs bubbled
Germany is the leader in Europe in the coal industry with significant amounts of coal operations, especially lignite. Germany has approximately 73,000 million short tons of coal reserves with more than 47,000 and 25,000 million tons of lignite and hard coal reserves respectively (Miller 25). Germany is the major lignite producer in the whole of Europe with major lignite reserves found at Lusatian, Rhineland, central German basins, which are all of tertiary age. Coal is a major source of energy used in the generation of electricity and in the coking process. Apart from production German is a major importer of coal. The major hard coal deposits in the country are found in the regions of Ruhr and Saar coalfields, with major players being RAG Aktiengesellschaft and RWE Power being involved in the mining of hard coal and lignite respectively (Bischoff et al. 63). Of the lignite deposits, the Rhineland deposits are the largest and most significant for the nation and are located between the German/Belgium/Dutch boarder and the River Rhine (Miller 25). The Lusatian and Central German basins are found to the eastern side of Germany. These lignite deposits have heating values of 3350-5400Btu/lb, a moisture content of 40-60%, sulfur and ash content varying from 0.2-2.1% and 1.5-8.5% respectively, with the Rhineland lignite coal deposits having a sulfur content of less than 0.5% (Miller 25). The restructuring of the hard coal mining industry from 1999 led to the rapid development of
There has been a growing pressure to develop alternative energy production paths to reduce the dependency on fossil fuels, while at the same time reducing CO2 emissions to prevent global warming. Energy from the waste conversion is considered as alternative mean to create renewable energy. Besides its importance in power generation, char as one of the pyrolysis product is considered as a potential source that can be valorised alongside oil and gas (or syngas).
According to researchers Armstrong & Menon (1998), coal is a major energy source, constituting 25% of energy consumption worldwide (21% in the United States) and 40% of electricity generation worldwide (45% in the United States). Coal accounts for 40% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions and is therefore a major contributor to climate change (Armstrong & Menon, 1998). Coal can be produced through surface or underground mining both dangerous operations for workers. Injuries occur from falling rocks, falls into mine shafts, misuse of machinery, gas inhalation, explosions, floods, and cave ins. Respiratory exposures to silica dust and coal dust place miners at risk of silicosis and coal workers’ pneumoconiosis. Miners also suffer an excess risk of lung cancer.