Clinton 's Assault Rifle Ban

These people usually go to gun shows to sell firearms and many people refer to this as the gun show loophole. But these vendors don’t always have to go to gun shows, they can use classified ads or the internet to sell firearms without a background check. According to Watkins, “ Experts estimate that over six million guns a year - perhaps 40% of all sales – are made by unlicensed private dealers not subject to the law” (Watkins 5).

Gun control has been a prevalent issue in the United States since its early years, but has recently taken the spotlight as one of the most controversial, and debated topics in the country with the rise of alarming cases and accessible statistics. Because of our constitution, the right to bear arms has endured throughout the years with little revision. Republicans tend to argue strongly in favor of this amendment on the basis of constitutional right and the need for self-defense. (Waldman, 2017). However, the current lax system of background checks requirements for purchase of a firearm have contributed to numerous casualties and cannot stand without reform. In 2017 alone, 13,899 deaths have occurred at the expense of a gun in the United

One example of a gun show loophole are private sellers who sells guns to people without background checks. According to the Coalition to stop Gun Violence (CSGV), a non-profit gun control advocacy organization, “Private sellers aren’t required to perform background checks on buyers, whether it’s at gun shows or another venue.They aren’t required to record sales or identification. To paraphrase, private sellers can choose to run background checks and not get in trouble for it. If we made private sellers run background checks, than there would be less shootings because we would know who and who can’t have guns. Another example is gun shows, which is temporary markets for guns and ammunition. CSGV also states, “26,000 firearms are used in crimes associated with gun shows. In other words, closing gun shows can also deter crime. If we close gun shows felons and mentally ill people won’t be able to buy guns and also three fifth of the states closed their gun show loophole and they continue to thrive. In short, closing gun shows can protect law-abiding citizens, while keeping guns out of the hands of those prohibited from owning them.Even though people against gun control might say smart gun laws are excuses to ban guns, they’re actually a good way to prevent shootings. One example for smarter gun laws are background

There are many places that forbid people from carrying guns such as schools, publicly owned buildings, and businesses. According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, over 98% of mass shootings happened in a zone where guns were prohibited. Even though there are many restrictions on firearms sale and possession, there are extensive loopholes that make it possible for people who should not be able to own gun, to be able to purchase one. One of the most common used loopholes is buying from a small scale seller, or going to a gun show. These kinds of deals do not require that an extensive background check be performed. Another blurry loophole involves the mentally ill being able to get their hands on a gun. The current law that prevents mentally handicapped people from owning a gun requires that a person must be adjudicated as mentally defective in a court of law. A majority of mentally handicapped people are never adjudicated and can petition the court to overturn the ruling. The purpose of these laws and its likely effect is not the same thing. Gun control laws are usually more of a state decision than a federal decision. Many states gun laws differ, such as in Rhode Island, any person with a concealed weapons permit can enter a public school, but in a state over in Massachusetts, you must have extensive written permission from the school

According to a report by the Switzerland-based Small Arms Survey, the United States has about 35-50 percent of the world’s civilian-owned guns and has less than 5 percent of the world’s population. With no restriction and so much freedom, firearms can be distributed throughout the United States illegally and obtained as easy as buying it from a person, disregarding all gun laws. Implementing stricter background checks can help reduce the amount of crime relating to gun violence. It can also keep firearms away from those who shouldn’t have possession of them.

Many people think that gun control laws pushed by the Democratic Party will help reduce the amount of guns bought, this a very big misconception. The gun laws that are in effect now require a background check and age requirement, but according to Junior Scholastic there are,”major holes in it. Perhaps the biggest is that many small-scale sellers, who claim to be "hobbyists," aren't required to conduct background checks” this example shows that nearly anyone can buy a gun and do not have to have a background check. Another reason why gun control does not work is that,”A criminal could also resort to a method other than a firearm”(NRA). Before this great country was created men used swords, axes, daggers, bows and many other types of weapons to inflict terror, murder, and other horrid acts. The guns and other weapons are not what kill

Although background checks keep many people from buying a gun, there are a couple of loop holes in the system. In order to strengthen background checks the government needs to fix the loop holes that exist. About 40% of firearms are purchased through these loop holes without background checks (Martinez). One of the biggest loop holes is the one that exists at gun shows. Background checks are a proven way of helping prevent firearms from getting in to the wrong hands. Then how come at gun shows in some states they do not require a background check to purchase a weapon at a gun show? In most states at a gun show all that is required of the consumer to purchase the weapon is their

Around 10% of guns used in crime were either sold at a gun show or a flea market. Anybody of age can go to a gun show, purchase a gun from an unlicensed distributor and go about their day, no background check, no mental health check. Though, in recent events, Nikolas Cruz purchased his gun at the age of eighteen from someone who had their license to sell. He passed his background check easily because he had no criminal background but no one knew he was depressed, had ADHD, and autism, no one knew until after a horrendous incident that cost people their lives. I read in a Gun Control FAQ, the Gun Control Act of 1968 says anyone in the business of selling guns must be licensed by the government, but it doesn’t say anything about unlicensed men and women selling their guns from their personal collection is not “engaged in the business”, this means that they don’t have to perform background checks, anyone will do anything for some extra money. A simple loophole like this one can land a gun into the hands of a

The loopholes by means of retrieving a gun through a private vendor or the black market have recently been banned. The 2016 Nevada voters ballot included an initiative that eliminated those loopholes by instigating a background check on all gun purchases. They must be held through a licensed dealer. The objective of the The Nevada Background Checks for Gun Purchases initiative is to essentially prevent

Gun control debates of the past have led to the passage of some legislation, the most prominent measure being the Brady Bill, which required that background checks be run on potential customers before they were sold a gun. However, this national legislation concerning gun control only applies to licensed gun dealers. This has left a huge “gun control loophole,” the sale of firearms by unlicensed dealers and private collectors at gun shows, at the national level, which has recently become the center of intense debate. Those who support gun control (generally liberals) argue that it is necessary to regulate this area, while the other side of the debate (generally conservatives) contends that the enforcement of gun control

Another clear indication that the gun show loophole is a big problem in this country is the conviction of Ali Boumelhem for trying to smuggle guns obtained at gun shows in the United States abroad to be used for terrorist activities. Conservatives claim that this conviction illustrates that the current system works. However, these same people often forget to mention the fact that Boumelhem was a previously convicted felon and therefore should not have been allowed to purchase a firearm. In his article “Keeping Guns Away from Terrorists,” Eric Holder Jr. includes this fact and silences any argument that the loophole does not exist when he says:

In “The Encyclopedia of Gun Control and Gun Rights”, by Glenn Utter, he talks about the easiness to buy guns at a gun show “ Gun shows display a wide variety of handguns, rifles, and shotguns both new and used…. By purchasing a used handgun, a buyer can avoid the Brady Act’s background check because only new weapons are covered under that statute.” (Utter, 121). Allowing these practices to conduct puts innocent lives at risk because a person could just wake up in the morning and just go shoot people just cause. The government should change the gun control laws to require it to take longer for a person to purchase a firearm all across the US.

If the government would take a more rapid pace in a full assault weapon ban, then the murder rate in the country would drop dramatically. The U.S. has one of the highest murder rates for developed countries such as Japan who has a murder rate of 0.4 per 100,000 people and Britain with a 1.2 per 100,000 people. The U.S. has a murder rate of 4.7 per 100,000 people and it is not getting any better. A ban on assault rifles would have a positive effect on the murder rate. Assault rifles are known to be the most dangerous firearm in the world because of its rapid fire capability and its deadly range and damage. That is what makes it such a unique and interesting weapon that should not be taken lightly. The government has been working on some bills but they are not putting enough work into making it happen. Senator Dianne Feinstein, who is in charge of the processes of the ban, is suggesting is that the government passes a bill that will limit the capacity of ammunition in a magazine and ban assault weapons that are too dangerous for public use. The safety of U.S. citizens is vital and banning assault rifles will help make the United States a safer place.

The United States is home to approximately 5% of the world’s population and 31% of all mass shootings. Through these mass shootings and various other methods of gun violence, tens of thousands of people die every year. These gun-related deaths primarily originate from murder and children accidentally shooting themselves. Although those in favor of gun control tend to believe that guns should be terminated completely, the second amendment prevents lawmakers from being able to do so. Therefore, in order to combat these causes, alternative gun control solutions must be made for each one. Gun-related murders can be decreased through the use of universal background checks. Additionally, accidental shootings can be minimized through the

There are new proposed gun control laws in the aftermath of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newton, Connecticut that occurred on December 14th, 2012. This incident claimed the lives of twenty 1st graders and six adults and has set the government in motion to try to prevent future acts of violence by strengthening gun control laws in the United States (Smith). This has been a topic that has been an extremely emotional debate with people on both sides unwilling to compromise. Gun advocates and critics of the new proposed gun laws argue that these new laws infringe on our constitutional