Cloning Controversy In Scientific Research

     As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely to ignite a debate. This is because people are greatly divided on whether it's good or bad. A way to reach a conclusion is to look at cloning from ethical, risk, and religious perspectives. The reality is, cloning is unethical, very risky, and irreligious. The arguments I will make will hopefully convince you that cloning is not good for the future.

Genetic cloning is one of the most controversial topics of all time. People, specifically scientists, are constantly searching for ways to improve the quality of human life. As a result, they began genetically engineering animals and are currently in search of a method to genetically engineer humans as well; which is called human cloning. There are many reasons why people should not go forward with this step since genetic cloning, consequently human cloning, does not respect nature nor does it ensure diversity and survival in natural ecosystems. In addition, genetic cloning is a cruel, harsh, and an unsafe experiment.

Dear Andy Vidak, In the topic of Human Cloning, people carry many opinions on this subject. Scientists have been working to improve in science technology. Cloning was declared a massive step in science revolution. Many people believe cloning is wrong and against humanity. They feel as though it devalues humans and may cause segregation. For those who agree with human cloning, believe it can help by providing those in need or organs/limbs the exact copy they need. Human cloning does have its properties but also has its major defects.

The issues behind cloning are many, but the most relevant are religion and ethics. In most religions, a higher power is the only one who can create a human or the process for making one. For example, Christian belief states that God is the only one who can create life.(Putatunda, “The Legal and Ethical Issues of Cloning That Make it Controversial.”) Any way that circumvents God’s plan of creation is considered unnatural. Cloning is also considered unethical, for two basic reasons. The first is that the process has a high failure rate and the second is the belief that a human controlling another’s genes is wrong. (Shapiro, “Ethical and Policy Issues of Human Cloning.”) While these are legitimate concerns, cloning does have many helpful applications. First, cloning can grow healthy cells and organs

There are two types of cloning, one of them is reproductive cloning which is when a whole organism is cloned and therapeutic cloning is the cloning of cells, organs or tissues. Cloning is when two cells decide or are forced to duplicate into two cells to replicate each other. Cloning can be done deliberately or naturally; and it results in two copies having identical cells, DNA, genes, organs and organisms. Cloning is a common, ongoing, debatable topic among society today. Many people argue about how future scientific advances in cloning will affect society. Most often people dislike the idea of cloning because it goes against their ethical beliefs, or because they are in fear of it ending up in the wrong hands. But sometimes when the

In conclusion, cloning has many massive advantages, that could greatly help our future generations. Cloning can help our future generations by, making our kids and their kids healthier by potentially eliminating infertility, and by helping cure diseases such as AIDS, and cancer. But one of the slight disadvantages is the interaction between cloning and religious things. But if we were to ignore the amazing medical possibilities of cloning just because of the interaction between it and cloning, then it would be a grave

Many people have different opinions on cloning. There are many pros and cons. Advancements in cloning may be in the future. Maybe people would be able to live longer, healthier lives. Therapeutic and reproductive cloning can be

According to Mosby’s Medical Dictionary, the term “cloning” is defined as “a procedure for producing multiple copies of genetically identical organisms or cells or of individual genes.” Researchers have conducted several cloning experiments over the years, replicating tissues, organs, and even full organisms such as Dolly the Sheep in 1997. The history of cloning dates back to the early 1900’s when Hans Adolf Edward Dreisch studied the results of separating two-celled sea urchin embryos (“The History of Cloning”). The process has since evolved and become a process that is widely talked about amongst doctors, scientists and the general public. The process of cloning has been predicted to play a significant role in medical advancements in the near future. The main areas of which cloning could potentially affect are treatments for various diseases through organ replacement and infertility. As many topics in science, controversy exists regarding the subject of cloning in addition to its’ advantages and disadvantages.

While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be

Cloning is the process of creating a copy of something. In genetics cloning refers to the process of making an identical copy of the DNA of an organism. Human cloning is basically making a person exactly like the other, same exact features and characteristics etc. There are three different types of cloning and they are Recombinant DNA Technology or DNA cloning, Reproductive cloning, and Therapeutic cloning. Cloning can cause many problems to the animal that is being cloned making it impossible for them to live a normal life.

As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely engendering a cyclopean debate. The reason for this is because people are immensely divided on whether or not cloning is a positive technological advance or a negative one. One way to come to any type of conclusion when it comes to this controversial topic of discussion is to visually examine cloning from an ethical, jeopardy, and religious perspective. The rigorous authenticity people need to realize as well as accept is, cloning is unethical, very precarious, and irreligious.

Reprodictive Cloning is a matter of asexual reproduction meaning it will be related to you as in a new category of a human. Therapeutic Cloning is a kind of therapy for diseases.Cloning has been around for a long period of time. It first began with plants in the 1800s then it moved uo to the 1960s with small animals. The first mammal,Dolly the Sheep was cloned in 1997.Neither reproductive or therapeutic cloning should be legal. If one kind of cloning becomes legal than most likely the other kind would be too. Not everybody would benefit from it, a human embryo is a human being, and regardless of the type, when it does not work it is a loss of a human,animal,or organism.

There are a multitude of debated ethical topics, especially with the the rapid development of scientific advancements and technology. It is important to consider the philosophy of morality as scientific developments continue to evolve. The topic of human cloning is definitely one of the most fascinating, yet highly controversial topics.

This article is neutral and serves as an informative piece to give a general overview of cloning and both sides. The article gives information on the three types of cloning, history and the opposing points of view throughout history, and more current information about cloning. The authors reference many opinions of both the supporting and opposing groups of cloning, but they do not advocate for one side over the other. The authors of the second article “Counterpoint: Human Cloning Treats Human Life as a Commodity”, opposes cloning because the authors believe that it is harmful to animals and immoral. In this article, the authors state more arguments that do not support cloning and that a minority of Americans support cloning. However, it briefly states that Christians and Protestants have mixed feelings about genetically recombining DNA, and some people from Christianity, Islam, and Judaism do not oppose therapeutic cloning. Even though a portion of the article mentions that some religious groups support some types of cloning, the majority of the article opposes

Cloning is a controversial topic that has been discussed for good period of time. The ability to make an identical copy of something or someone could be both an advantage and a disadvantage, this is why it is so commonly fought over. Many scientists have experimented with cloning to find a way to make the perfect copy of that same organism, but few have succeeded. Cloning is a topic scientists have found interesting for many years, and many people fight over the advantages and disadvantages, and whether or not it is good for humankind.