Essay on Cloning: How Far Should We Go?

Cloning, an ethical issue that has been pressed across the globe, has become a substantial debate throughout a majority of nations. The incorporation of a new type of reproduction in the United States has a plentiful amount of benefits for certain animals and objects, but duplicates of humans is hard to comprehend for many people across America. Currently, cloning is an interesting topic that could become a new way to improve reproduction of animals and humans, prevent diseases, and increase the overall health of Americans.

While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be

The possibility of stem cell research exploded with momentum when a certain sheep named Dolly was born. The reason why this was such a breakthrough is because Dolly was the first mammal ever cloned. Although this all began in 1996, the study into stem cell research has been documented since the 1960’s, where Joseph Altman and Gopal Das brought forward new evidence of adult neurogenesis ( the ongoing stem cell activity in the brain). The birth of Dolly brought many breakthroughs for the scientific community but it also created an avalanche of concern because of the ethical implications. With all of the reporting on Dolly, the news media only spoke of one type of cloning and that is reproductive cloning. This may be the most popular

In the advanced technological world we live in today, we’ve made things possible that our ancestors may have only dreamed of. Our remarkable advances in the field of science have allowed us to make cloning possible. But as with all new discoveries, it not only poses as a beneficial advancement, but some might even say, a threatening one. To understand why it would seem harmful or unjust would mean to understand the concepts of cloning and how it is viewed in society. Cloning has the potential to revolutionize the field of medicine, the meat and dairy industry and animal conservation, leaning it more towards its positive aspects than negative ones.

The topic of cloning has always been very controversial in today’s society. Some people believe that cloning is unethical and should not be done, while others believe cloning is perfectly fine and should be done. Both of these views have many people supporting them and have many different reasons to prove their case.

There are a multitude of debated ethical topics, especially with the the rapid development of scientific advancements and technology. It is important to consider the philosophy of morality as scientific developments continue to evolve. The topic of human cloning is definitely one of the most fascinating, yet highly controversial topics.

The cloning of a sheep named Dolly in 1997 sparked a large-scale international debate about the future of the process of creating genetically identical individuals known as clones. New questions needed to be addressed now on a legislative level that were never an issue beforehand. Is it possible to clone human beings? Is it ethical to produce human clones? Is it helpful for science or feasible? Currently, there are two forms of cloning available for science. The first is therapeutic cloning which involves the cloning of human embryos for the purpose of studying and advancing science with the expressed goal of harvesting stem cells for research (Human Genome Project Information, 2008).

The process of human cloning has been an ethical debate and it creates the question about the benefits and complications of it. Dolly the sheep was a major breakthrough in science as it was the first mammal to be successfully cloned from an adult somatic cell (Furlong & Morrison, 2013). Although Dolly was a successful experiment, it is unsure to say that cloning will be successful in the future. Scientist had done many trials

Reproductive cloning may harm children psychologically. Parents might harbor unfair expectations on the child, and this can hinder the child's personal growth and undermine the child's interests in forming a unique identity (Daar et al., 2016).

Human cloning has always been a highly controversial issue. To be able to clone a human or not be able to? That is the question. Some believe human cloning is the next step in science and should be something worthy of experimenting on; conversely, others think human cloning is unethical and shouldn’t be something scientists should be studying. Human cloning could have many problems and shouldn’t be experimented on.

The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.

If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right

Many people have asked, "Why would anyone want to clone a human being?" There are at least two good reasons: to allow families to conceive twins of exceptional individuals, and to allow childless couples to reproduce. In a free society we must also ask, "Are the negative consequences sufficiently compelling that we must prohibit consenting adults from doing this?" We will see that in general they are not. Where specific abuses are anticipated, these can be avoided by targeted laws and regulations, which I will suggest below.

Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic

The human intellectual capacity needs to develop a greater mindset to overcome the obstruction that for ages has inhibited the progress of science. For instance, the duplicating of human beings seems to be delayed by moral and ethical views preventing further development of this research. Because the cloning of human beings rises many moral confrontations, it raises the question if cloning a human being is correct. The cloning should not be allowed to be prosecuted; however, it should be controlled to what means if being used for, and be limited to the cloning of organs tissue. It should not be extended to a whole human creature.