Cloning Persuasive Letter

Jurassic World was a jaw-dropping movie; however, in reality, cloning can have much more significant applications than simply making a dinosaur zoo. Ever since biologists have taken an interest in cloning in the late 1800's, many findings has progressed our knowledge about cloning. In 1996, Dolly the Sheep was the first mammal to ever be cloned. It has been 17 years since that scientific discovery; biologists have now made further findings. Researchers have now transferred their technique to the cloning of human cells. This scientific breakthrough will bring new perspectives and advance our understanding of the world. I believe that you should support cloning because it has the potential to create medical miracles, help those who would wish

Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow

What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff

On the other hand, there are also some scientists that think that the cloning of humans should not be allowed. Michele Orecklin reports in Time magazine that Dr. Leon Kass an eminent University of Chicago Bioethicist makes his views against human cloning well known. Kass this past year was picked by President Bush to head an advisory panel on stem cell research. Kass had recently been changing from a political thinker to a political player because of his opposition to human cloning and he believes that cloning robs us of our humanity. On June 20, 2001 Dr. Kass gave testimony on his opinions of human cloning in front of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. Kass started his testimony by saying that he supported the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2001 for two reasons. The first reason given by Kass was that human cloning was unethical, both in itself as well as to what it could lead to. His second reason was that he believes that this bill is the only "reasonable" chance at preventing human cloning from happening. Here is an excerpt from his testimony.

There should be no room to clone any human being nor animal. There is so much more to find out about our world then to test the non-achieved and inefficient process of cloning. Therefore I am against any type of cloning, whether therapeutic or reproductive. Andy vidak I write to you this letter, to give you a better understanding of why funding for cloning would set us back as a society. Genuinely I care about our future because I want our generation to be known as the one who did brilliant things. The excuse that cloning can potentially result in medical breakthrough is unacceptable because, like president George W. Bush said in his 2002 speech about human cloning, “We can pursue medical research with a clear sense of moral purpose.” (Office of the Press Secretary par. 12). Research cloning would contradict the most underlying principle of medical ethics, that no human life should be exploited for the convenience of another. For that reason I stand by

Dear, Governor Jerry Brown, I am writing to to you because I have noticed a new bill come up and it's about cloning. I believe that we should not pass this bill, we should stop it, and it shouldn't have became a bill in the first place. I think we should stop funding cloning and should stop treating it like it's the right thing to do. We should not as a state, pass this law. Why? Well because thats a waste of taxpayer money. We can fund other nessicasity, like better school and education. We can fund things that are relevant instead of something that barely anyone can afford. Cloning is useless and the only good thing about it, is that we can learn more science from it. Another reason why you should not pass it, the scientist can use it the wrong way. The scientist who work on cloning can make some sort of superhuman or super animal with hybrid genetics, and where they are so superior we can't defeat it, and there goes the worlds then we are in a apocalypse. And for my last reason on why you should not pass this bill, it's not life like, if something's passes away then it passes away, no need to bring it back, and it may even suffer more after it does come back.

Animal cloning is a problem that many of us unknowingly approve of every day. Hundreds of innocent animals are dying and suffering due to animal cloning experiments.

I would like to introduce myself as Brian Sierra. I am a junior at Dinuba High School in California. A new bill just came up and it allows the use of taxpayer money to found both therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all animals and humans. I am going to tell you all the advantages and all the good stuff we could do with both ways of reproduction. I want to tell you that I am approving this subject because reproductive and therapeutic cloning would really benefit a lot of people’s life. Even though a lot of people are against both ways of cloning. They just talk about the disadvantages and the problems that is has. Cloning could be used in a good way and I am going to tell you the advantages and all the good stuff we could do with both ways of cloning.

An individual's life should not have the sole purpose of satisfying someone else's needs and desires. "The facts of science make clear that from the earliest stages of development, embryos (whether produced through normal reproduction or cloning) are distinct, living, and whole human beings. True, they have yet to grow and mature, but they are whole human beings nontheless" (Klusendorf, Scott) Even when identical twins are naturally created, the embryo splits spontaneously and gives the new embryo a new unique genetic combination. Keeping this in mind, I belive that it is a good thing that the government has interfered in advancements concerning human and animal cloning.

I would like to introduce myself as Falantina Rashoo and would like to discuss the bill about the reproductive and therapeutic cloning and the process of each and weather people should be against it or with it and why you should not vote for the bill. There has been a lot of people that are alright with reproductive and therapeutic cloning. Some people do not understand that sometimes things can go wrong while cloning. people might be alright with cloning animals that are gone forever but cloning pets that just died and just because some people want another copy of their loved pet that they lost does not mean that we should play with the nature and control it by making another copy of the pet.

If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right

When looked up on Google i hear well spoken thoughts on you. After reading your background and what made you into who you are today made me realize that you are a well spoken person. This letter is in regards of passing a bill on cloning. Cloning is when person is basically replicated. This is not always the case because the experiment can also be done to animals. Pet owners choose to pay extra money to buy a pet that will be categorized as in the “superior breed”. I understand that you are a businesswoman and make decisions that will not only have an effect on you but the U.S. I hope that you take this into consideration and let my words help make a positive impact to the communities throughout the U.S.

The cloning of humans is now very close to reality, thanks to the historic scientific breakthrough of Dr. Ian Wilmut and his colleagues in the UK. This possibility is one of incredible potential benefit for all of us. Unfortunately the initial debate on this issue has been dominated by misleading, sensationalized accounts in the news media and negative emotional reactions derived from inaccurate science fiction. Much of the negativity about human cloning is based simply on the breathtaking novelty of the concept rather than on any real undesirable consequences. On balance, human cloning would have overwhelming advantages if regulated in a reasonable way. A comprehensive ban on human cloning by a misinformed public would be a sorry

Religious views are prevalent, so too are numerous ethical concerns. The issue of whether or not the government should ban cloning has gained progressive attention, as the science of animal cloning is further perfected. BIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND Animal cloning is the process of creating a biological replicate of another organism with the

Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic