Cloning: The Synthetic Way of Life

Some people actually say that we can benefit from cloning. Scientists think that we can clone “geniuses” and advance in society (Utah Genetics). This brings up a very good point. What if we can clone 5 Albert Einsteins?! What if we clone all of the smartest minds to ever exist. Can we cure cancer? I think we can! Maybe we can even stop ebola. Lots of people are seriously thinking about this and how beneficial it would be. But some people can take this out of hand. Some scientists are considering making “human farms” where clones are made and their only purpose is to kill them and take their organs to sell. This is why cloning should not be easily accessible. Some freaky scientists are actually considering this idea. We need to be smarter, we need to be consistent , and we need to keep an eye out for these crazy scientists. And God knows what other crazy idea they have inside their heads. But many people think that cloning can be beneficial to society if it is used

Imagine if you lived in a world where everyone was the same and had no physical differences. Everyone would have the exact same DNA. There would be no diversity within the population. If we continue to clone then this may be a possibility for the future. As of now there have been no cloned humans, but we are not too far away from being able to do so. Scientists have been cloning since as early as 1886, and have been cloning animals since 1996 with the birth of Dolly the sheep. Dolly the sheep was created by using reproductive cloning which is used to produce copies of whole animals (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Furthermore, there are two other types of cloning; therapeutic cloning and gene cloning. Therapeutic cloning is used to produce embryonic stem cells for medical research (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Gene cloning is used to produce copies of genes or segments of DNA (Cloning Fact Sheet NHGRI). Cloning should not be allowed because it is inhumane and unethical, results in more failure than it does results, and is unfeasible.

If you would like to have your own identity, your own physical features, even your own DNA, then cloning is not for you. Cloning is a horrific idea due to security issues alone. For instance, no one’s fingerprints or DNA are the same it does not matter if it is your mother/father or even your brother/sister; the genetic makeup may be the same, but it is not one hundred percent not even for identical twins. On the other hand, if an individual has been or choses to be cloned they would no longer have that little form of self-identity.

A clone could be used as a perfect donor for a sick person. If this ever happened the clone would be subjected to painful procedures and forced to live his/her life completely for the purpose of another. “Allowing cloning would be taking a significant step toward a society in which human beings are grown for spare body parts, and children are engineered to custom specifications; and that’s not acceptable” (Bush).

Cloning is very unethical. It would be violating the human rights in many ways. It would be violating of the freedom of beliefs and thoughts (Peter Flaherty, and D. Lynn Moore. Civics. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2000) Cloning also reduces human dignity. Humans can be sold as manufactured products. If we allow

There is plainly a huge measure of moral and good stresses as for human cloning. Human life is acknowledged to be important and blessed. Cloning certainly is now and again successful the principal gone through, which infers that human creating leaves will fail miserably. Most would concur that cloning is like murder or manslaughter in any occasion. For the people who don't assume that life is holy, it is basically tissue being disposed of. Cloning is hostile. The most vital piece of a man is their soul, soul or psyche and cloning does not enable one to accomplish this, it rather enables one to endeavor to accomplish some hereditary standard. There is no hobby for cloning, it is inhumane to the point that there are people on this planet with to a great degree cruel desires and human cloning would take into account military utilize. For instance, a country that could clone people could make a massive outfitted power that could attempt to expect control distinctive countries and provoke boundless wars of emotionless men. Individuals should be made through an exhibition of love and not a show of science. One that is cloned can never again be seen as a man, as your identity isn't generally essentially yours; you are giving it to someone else. Another case for instance, if mental oppressor seats had the ability to clone then the world would be an extensively all the more startling spot reliably in fear of being ambushed at any dark time. This, and in addition human cloning could

Cloning kills individuality. What if human cloning was allowed? Would you still feel special and unique? I certainly wouldn’t but many people believe human cloning will not compromise human individuality. Those people would accept them as another part of human society according to the article, “Arguments for and Against Creating Human Clones”. Even if people did

In this day and age, many technology that were a fantasy for our grandparents and great-grandparents are becoming legitimately plausible advancements. One such fantasy that has become a reality is cloning. Cloning is defined as the asexual creation of a genetic duplicate of whatever organism it is derived. Scientists are not far away from being able to do this, and this frightens many people. The possibility of humans created in a lab is a frightening thought, so many people have fought against the progression of research, arguing that these clones do not have the ability to truly be individuals. In our world and technology, cloning is scientifically plausible, but in a world that emphasizes individuality, this technology is not as welcomed

Clones will not be treated like real humans or get the same respect like most people do. It is stated in “Ethical Issues of Clothing” that a man, along with his clone can never be dignified as a single identity. The clone is basically a man-made product in which they will be strip from their individuality even though they should be have rights because they're living human beings. They will be just a object just like Frankenstein’s creature. The creature was not treated like a human, he was treated like a monster who deserve no rights to be in this world.

The idea of cloning is useless because it has way more negatives impacts rather than positive. Having someone who is an identical copy of you, made with the same DNA, yet still so far from the Clone. Advances in science like cloning are bad because Cloning transfers everything including diseases and/or abnormalities. Cloning is dangerous because the results are unknown. Something different that is never expected can happen each time. The main reason that Cloning is bad, is because the life of a Clone will be much different and way more tough.

While some believe cloning to be acceptable others feel equally strongly that human cloning is completely wrong. With the state of the science as it is at the moment it would involve hundreds of damaged pregnancies to achieve one single live cloned baby. What is more, all the evidence suggests that clones are unhealthy and often have a number of built-in genetic defects, which lead to premature ageing and death. It would be completely wrong to bring a child into the world knowing that it was extremely likely to be affected by problems like these. The dignity of human life and the genetic uniqueness we all have would be attacked if cloning became commonplace. People might be

Cloning is an issue now and will be in the in the future,animals are cloned all the time.Does the human race want to have a copy of itself. We need to understand what is happening to the cloned animals and what could possibly happen to us if we were to be cloned.

Cloning enables one to create another human who is under his/her full control. It would be easier for people to clone humans specifically for carrying out terrorism and theft-related activities. The advantage lies in the ability to stay in the background without facing the law. Further, the death of a clone does not prevent one from creating another one for the same purpose. In conclusion, the cloning will lead to unprecedented opportunities for people to undertake certain activities, which may not be possible

In “Human Cloning Is Unethical,” Megan Best explains a little bit what she thinks about cloning. In “Human Cloning Is Ethical,” Stuart K. Hayashi tries to prove that cloning is ethical. According to him, clones will have their own personalities and cloning is a kind of procedure that gives enormous advantages to the World. In my opinion, I think that cloning is unethical too. First of all, it is not something natural; I believe we have to be treated with dignity because we are unique.

As Kant said, will cloning interfere with one’s individual duty and discriminate between humans and clones? Some potential harms and disadvantages would be the possibility of compromising individualities, loss of generic variation, clones may be treated as second-class citizens and most of all technology is not well developed to clone humans. As well as extremely high rate of death and risk of development abnormalities from cloning like mentioned before. This brings up some ethical issues. A human clone is not just a delayed twin. It is far more than that. Human twin studies and the quantum physics of mind and consciousness suggests that as a cloned person matures in development, they and their genomic donor will become one and the same person;