Cnn 's Network And Network

The website CNN helps inform people with the top bullet points such as sports , politics, and world affairs. The sports helps inform people what is going on with sports like what happened in a game, and like if there is a type of trade in baseball, or basketball. The reason why CNN helps to inform people is because it keeps observers up to date on specific topics and information located inside these bullet

Paragraph 4: the strengths and the weakness to the media outlet. CNN news and History Channel both provide informations and facts but they both take out little pieces of informations. CNN news may not be true to other media sources because media like ABC news and Chicago news other media sources may have the same details. History channel will give the time of the 9/11 attack and the day it happened and the place it was took at. History channel sometimes may not give you all the details and more informations.

The biggest breaking story I chose was about the Afghans heading to the polls to vote amid the threats of insurgent attacks. On the CNN website, it seemed like the story was less detailed and descriptive than the other sites. Even though it covered the situation in Afghanistan, the information was delivered in a more passive way than FOXNews and MSNBC, almost as if it was a more opinion-based article. I noticed also that some of the key points that were covered on the CNN site were also covered in the other sites. Information on how many candidates were competing for election and how many seats were available in parliament seemed to be a point that all of the sites included. One main difference in the information that CNN covered, compared

It is clear that in each article I was only getting one side not the full report of the story. However, I do feel that CNN.com did a more accurate look at my topic, which was the Pope at the Paris Summit. The reason I believe that U.S. News’s article is not as good of a news source because when reading it, reads more like a complaint, or a letter to the editor type article than an actual news article on the topic of the Paris Summit. The U.S. News article only had one source and he was a self proclaimed official source, where as the CNN.com piece actually had quotes from several of the different members that were at the summit as well has official comments from Pope Francis. Also the CNN.com piece was worded nicely and had an air throughout the piece of just wanting to give the facts of the story, whereas the U.S News article was force feeding complaints and used wording that almost half way through I just wanted to stop reading because it was an opinion packed piece and only really a few times hinted at facts. Therefore, I would have to say that the CNN.com piece not only gave me facts that I wanted to learn it also peaked my interest in the topic and made me want to go out and research more about the topic from other sites, which I feel is good journalism because it’s hooked the reader unlike the U.S. News piece that was not very factual and made me want to stop

The media industry in the United States of America (US) is one such industry. As a powerful communication tool, the media has attracted many companies but only a handful has grown big. These media giants have dominated the local market and are currently seeking to conquer the global media industry in search of better profits.

Their website had a lot going on and many article choices. Unlike Fox News, CNN shows Bernie Sanders’ full quotes and not just one word. This particular article really showed the good that is Bernie Sanders’ when they quoted “They want to make this personal, I choose not to do that.” ("Bernie Sanders Won't Hit Clinton on 'damn Emails' - CNNPolitics.com." CNN. Cable News Network, n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2015.) CNN showed the good of Sanders and did not use words that would make people not want to vote for him. When you search for Bernie Sanders on CNN’s website a lot of legitimate articles are

While the five major commercial broadcasters in the United States - ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, and The CW - are all networks, PBS is not. PBS is a program distributor and broadcaster.

There were distinct ideological beliefs presented in the articles. MSNBC is very progressive and sees the Democratic party as infallible. In their narrative Republicans are evil, stupid, and racist. If Obama says "jump", MSNBC is already falling off the bridge. CNN tries to present itself as unbiased but fails. It is not an utter failure. At some points the facade of neutrality is believable. But their pro-establishment bias is strong. I felt like they preferred Democrat's; but in a Republican presidence the roles may reverse. Finally Fox News i very conservative and pro-Republican. While CNN and MSNBC treat Obama as a strong leader, Fox contrasts this with depictions of a weak man. Fox was the oppisite extreme of MSNBC. It really just felt

Immediately, when I went to CNN.com, I found a link with a picture to see all information, about the terror strike in Mumbai. Also, there was links where you could click on videos to see how deadly the situation truly was. CNN.com included things such as: the causalities rates and also how many people were injured. Furthermore, the site also gives information about how you could link this story to Facebook, or even Twitter, so that other people could read about what is going on around the world. With this in mind, this could and would increase CNN.com publicity, making more people view the top stories as a result. Therefore, CNN.com provided a lot of information and coverage of the terror strike

For history the strengths are as follows. First off, it’s a reliable source, it gives first hand accounts of the event, it gave plenty of information, it was accurate information, there was photos taken of the event, and the information given was spot on. Weaknesses are now as follows. It gives an estimate of how many people were killed/injured, it doesn’t tell why the 19 members of Al-Qaeda decided to hijack the 4 american airlines planes, and it doesn’t tell how they were able to hijack the planes. CNN’s strengths are as follows. It gives accurate information, it’s a reliable source, it gives first hand accounts, and it gives live footage of the disaster. CNN’s weaknesses are as follows. It gives an estimate of how many people were injured, it doesn’t tell why the 19 members of Al-Qaeda decided to hijack the 4 american airlines planes, and it doesn’t tell how they were able to hijack the

Do the media today report the news or distort the news? Do we watch news or entertainment? What do you think CNN’s role, or the BBC’s should be? What about Al-Jazeera? Is news reporting today objective or is it necessarily culturally biased?

My major is Government (Political Science) and of course I am going to get a job that ties into my Political Science degree. Since Political Sciences is basically the study of politics, I want to work in place where politics is the main focus. So that's why I choose to work for CNN. And CNN is a company that employs people who have great knowledge and understanding of politics. Cable News Network is basic cable and satellite television news channel owned by turner broadcasting system. CNN was founded in the year 1980 by American media proprietor Ted Turner as a twenty-four cable news channel.

When it comes to finding about the news of what’s going on in our world, we want details and facts. We want the juice of what’s actually going on. The debate between the efficiency of newspapers and TV news, TV news is a lot more effective.

Twentieth Century Fox, a subsidiary of News Corporation, has promoted its parent company's own Sky News channel through including it as a plot device when characters are viewing news

Cable News Network/CNN is a news network that offers real-time coverage of ongoing news throughout the world.