Essay on Coca-Cola Financial Analysis

Aspire’s Quick Ratio below the industry average for year 1999-2000. The company appears to have higher risk than that of the industry. The current ratio and the quick ratio are below the industry average for year 1999- 2000. Thus, the company would have difficulty covering its obligations when compared to other companies within the same industry.

The current ratio measures the company’s ability to pay its short term obligations with its short term assets. Between Coca Cola and PepsiCo, PepsiCo has a higher current ratio implying that is more capable of paying its obligations. The debt management policies of Coca-Cola in conjunction with share repurchase program and investment activity resulted in current liabilities exceeding current assets. From the ratio Pepsi Co suddenly had to pay all its short-term

Quick ratio is another measure of liquidity. In quick ratio we consider only liquid assets and its standard ratio is 1:1. Quick ratio of Peyton Approved is 7.63. Thus, there is no doubt that the company has got excellent liquidity. Company has enough liquid assets to pay off current liabilities.

The quick ratio denotes that the company's ability should satisfy the short-term obligations. In brief, how many times can the firm respond its current liabilities by using current assets without the final stock? As many times it can cover its obligations, as better for the company.

2005 total current assets $10,250 / $12,281 = 83.5% or a decrease from 2004 to 2005

The company’s current assets are just over two times its current liabilities, giving it a current ratio of 2.08. This is a sign of financial strength. The Quick ratio (current assets-inventory then divided by current liabilities) is 0.96. This measures the company’s ability to come up with cash in a matter of hours to days. It has working capital (current assets-current liabilities) of $7,508,998. With a working capital per dollar of sales of 15%. This is adequate given the high inventory turn.

This ratio is similar to current ratio, except that it excludes inventory from current assets. Inventory is subtracted because it is considered to be less liquid than other current assets, that is, it cannot be easily used to pay for the company’s current liabilities. A company having a quick ratio of at least 1.0, is considered to be financially stable. It has sufficient liquid assets and hence, it will be able to pay back its debts easily (Qasim Saleem et al., 2011).

The Quick Ratio also known as Acid Ratio is used by firms to determine liquidity position. It explains if the firm is able to pay all of their current debt liabilities. (Dyson, 2010) The graph above illustrates that over the period from 2007 to 2011 quick ratio was not more that 1, which means that their debts might not be covered all. The graph also indicates that a peak was in 2011.

The quick ratio for Boston Beer Company is 1.33. A company’s quick ratio is an indicator of a company’s short-term liquidity. This ratio is a more conservative form of the current ratio because it does not take into account inventory of the company when determining its current assets. Boston Beer Company still has a favorable ratio well above 1.0. While their current ratio is much better with all the inventory, Boston Beer Company is still a reliable company that can pay off its short term debts if need be.

These ratios help company in determining its capability to pay short-term debts. Liquidity ratios inform about, how quickly a firm can obtain cash by liquidating its current assets in order to pay its liabilities. General liquidity ratios are: current ratio and quick ratio. Current ration can be obtain by dividing company’s current assets by its’ current liabilities. Generally a current ratio of two is considered as good (Cleverley et al., 2011). Quick ratio also known as acid test determines company’s liabilities that need to be fulfilled on urgent basis. Quick ratio can be obtained by dividing quick assets by current liabilities. Quick ratio is considered as stricter because it excludes inventories from current assets. Generally a quick ratio of 1:1 is considered as good for the company. Higher quick

Pepsi Co 's assignment taken as a whole is to amplify the value of its shareholder 's investment through sales intensification, expenditure gearshift and prudent investment of resources (Bongiorno, 1996, p 71). In this pose, Pepsi believes that its moneymaking triumph depends on

The quick ratio reflects on a company’s ability to meet its current liabilities without liquidating inventories that could require markdowns. It is a more stringent test of liquidity than the current ratio and may provide more insight into company liquidity in some cases. For Colgate-Palmolive, the quick ratio has declined from 0.73 in 2008 to 0.58 in 2010. While this does not necessarily mean a problem, a higher current ratio and quick ratio analysis will mean that the company will not have difficulty in meeting its short-term obligations from its operations and not by liquidating its assets.

In year 2007 quick ratio reached dangerous point – 1,02, company’s ability to pay its short-term obligations was badly influenced by the increase in short-term liabilities In 2008 meaning of the ratio grew up, because of the factors listed above. In year 2009 both ratios fell, since company took more liabilities than in 2008: its short-term borrowings, current tax and short-term provisions increased Average showings on AstraZeneca Quick ratio during the period was 1,13, while GSK – 1,22 which again proves that GSK was more liquid during the analysed period.

Another solvency ratio that measures a company’s ability to survive over a long period is the long-term debt to networking capital ratio. In this formula one subtracts current liabilities from current assets and then the total is divided by the total by long-term debt obligations. This formula provides insight into an organization’s ability to pay back long-term debt and interest. According to numbers from Appendix B Coca-Cola’s ability to pay

The quick ratio of 1.46 is a further analysis into the actual monetary values that are highly liquid and excluding fixed assets as part of the assets. The CFO/Avg. current liabilities also show a healthy 73%, 28% in 2004, on average of which is still higher than the industry.