Code Of Ethics By Credentialing Association (ACA)

The oldest and the largest union in the United States, the American Correctional Associated (ACA) was first founded in 1870 under the name of the National Prison Association (The history of the American, n.d.) In 1970, the American Correctional Association comprised a set of standards that were later revised in 2002 for the members to promote professional and ethical conduct and called them the ACA Code of Ethics (American Correctional, n.d.). Although it is believed by some that corrections has still not achieved professional status, the ACA has made leaps in achieving this title by mandating training standards and a code of ethics for its members to follow (Schmalleger & Smykla, 2017). If members within the profession decide not to follow

The ACA and NAADAC code of ethics will help the counselor with decision making. When the counselor is not sure how to act or say about an issue, it is important that she goes back and review the ACA and NAADAC code of ethics to make sure she is not being biased or discriminating a client in her practice. ACA and NAADAC is a guide that will help the counselor to reference.

The American Counseling Association has also developed a Code of Ethics that all counselors are bound to follow to uphold the integrity of the profession. The Code of Ethics has a specific area devoted solely to research and how procedures should be handled. First and foremost, researchers should follow all federal, state, and local laws pertaining to research with human subjects (ACA, 2005). The Code of Ethics also explains that researchers are responsible for the well being of their subjects and they should take special precautions to avoid harm in any way, including physical,

The NASW Code of Ethics is the guideline for social workers in regards to professional conduct and practice. The Code of Ethics is divided into four parts: “The Preamble,” “Purpose of the NASW Code of Ethics,” “Ethical Principles,” and “Ethical Standards.” These sections educate social workers on what their mission is, and how they complete that mission with true morality. Within the Code, there are six values presented which are also used in regards to helping and practicing with clients honorably. These six values are: service, social justice, dignity and worth, importance of human relationships, integrity, and competence. These six values are the principles that drive social work practice, and are used by social workers everyday.

Professional associations establish codes of ethics to ensure that clinicians uphold the standards of their association in order to protect the clients they serve and the profession they are affiliated with. This paper will compare the codes of ethics of the American Counseling Association (ACA), American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (AAMFT), and National Association of Social Workers (NASW).

Code of Ethics assists with six purposes, identifies core values; summarizes broad ethical principles; help social workers identify conflict or ethical uncertainties; ethical standards; socialize practitioners to the mission, principles, and standards, and enunciates standards in social work profession; for unethical conduct. The code assists when ethical issues arise, also how social workers should conduct

Over time, society has become increasingly diverse and globally connected. In order to meet the needs of an interconnected society, the American Counseling Association (ACA) endorsed the creation of multicultural and social justice competencies (Ratts, Singh, Butler, Nassar-McMillan, & McCullough, 2016). The Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling Competencies (MSJCC) were developed in order to showcase the importance of integrating MSJCC into all aspects of the counseling profession. Originally, these competencies were geared more toward majority professionals working with minority clients. However, it has become more clear that the range of diversity is endless and it is not uncommon for privileged clients to be counseled by minority counseled (Ratts, et al., 2016).

Great post! I like how you applied participants from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. In section A of the ACA code of ethics (2014), it focuses on the counseling relationship, that they encourage to actively attempt to understand the diverse culture backgrounds of the clients they serve.

In all professions there are specific guidelines laid out that professionals are expected to follow in order to keep up with the standards and respect of their practice. Specifically in regards to social work there is the Code of Ethics which social workers are required to follow to practice legally and ethically. The social work code of ethics written by the National Association of Social workers (NASW) in 1999 covers a wide range of topics, characteristics, and values that a social worker must follow. Furthermore, it is spilt up into four different division each covering a varieties of practice skills that social workers must be aware of.

The NASW Code of Ethics is intended to serve as a guide to the everyday professional conduct of social workers. (NASW, 2016) The NASW Code of Ethics is in place to help guide the everyday social worker and to foster a community of a trustworthy and purposeful practice. The Code

In the field of counseling psychology, there has been an effort to engage professionals in social justice work in order to move towards a more just society. Goodman, Liang, Helms, Latta, Sparks & Weintraub (2004) highlighted the difference between a theoretical understanding of social justice and action. The importance of taking action after gaining an understanding of the systematic oppression that maintains disenfranchised people oppressed is that in this way there can be change at the systematic level. Creating change at the individual level by empowering the oppressed is important but it may not ever change the institutional structures that have been in place for many years. Goodman et al. (2004) identified six themes that were common among multicultural counseling and feminist therapy in teaching social justice work. The six themes were listed as followed: self-examination, sharing power, giving voice, facilitating consciousness raising, building on strengths and leaving people with tools for

There is a great necessity for the code of ethics in social welfare. The first code of ethics was “adopted in 1960” and was a single page (NASW,1998, para. 8). The last major adoption was in 1996, which was similar to what we see today, in the 2008 edition. In this changing profession it is absolutely necessary for a social worker to have something to reference to when there is an ethical dilemma, because they will transpire from time to time (NASW, 1998).

The National Association of Social Workers have provided the Code of Ethics as a set of guidelines for social workers to follow in order to assure they are practicing in an ethical manner. These guidelines have been revised to address any additional information or critiques that are necessary for quality conduct that have arisen since the first edition that was drafted in 1960. They strive to address core values, such as “service, social justice, dignity and worth of the person, importance of human relationships, integrity and competence.” (National Association of Social Workers, 1999). In order to remain stringent with these core values, the Code of Ethics strives to fulfil six key purposes: “identify mission based core values and appropriately guided decisions making when conflicts and situations with questionable ethics, outline ethical standards and principles, introduce social workers to ethical principles, standards, values and mission, and provide a guideline for the population worked with to hold their social worker accountable for” (National Association of Social Workers, 1999).). Ethical violations may occur if these guidelines are not diligently followed, which ultimately could result in being sanctioned. Some of the consequences that could arise are: mandatory additional educational classes and refreshers in a constricted timeframe, additional supervision for licensure, fines for legal costs, and having your license and membership revoked.

The NASW Code of Ethics maybe considered the most ambitious set of ethical guidelines in social work history. Ethical issues have always been a concern of the professional social worker. As early as 1919 there were attempts to draft professional codes of ethics (Reamer, 1998). There have been several social work organizations since, that have attempted to draft ethical codes, such as the American Association for Organizing Family Social Work and several chapters of the American Association of Social Workers. In 1960 NASW adopted its first code of ethics, five years after the association was formed. The first code consisted of only 14 proclamations, with another added in 1957. In 1979 a new code was adopted, this code was far more

Code of ethics act as a promise to protect and support the safety of individuals in society, supports as a leading light it help the supporters of an occupation, resolve ethical problems and act as a protector the community. A code of ethics discloses and conserves the current viewpoint professionals on in what way to make ethical decisions. It stresses importance on obligation to moral values and vital beliefs. Application of a code of ethics helps us to guarantee that members of the profession will be accountable for their actions. It helps us to learn about the responsibility we have for ourselves, our colleagues and to the social structure of the profession. It is essential that the present and future psychologist should be