Colgate Case Study

Colgate-Palmolive Company built some remarkable strengths while striving to fore fill the opportunities. By matching internal strengths and external opportunities company will yield an industry leverage. Using Corporate reputation for quality, technological leadership and long tradition in the industry, Colgate will be able to differentiate its products. The latest development of Optic White High Impact toothpaste with a 4 day express teeth whitening technology will become company’s niche. Although, company plans to extend the product line, it will also need to protect itself from arising competitors and substitute products, thus increasing bargaining power of suppliers and customers alike. “Dependence on large-format retailers like Wal-Mart (WMT), Target (TGT), and Costco (COST), which have a great deal of bargaining strength,” (Morgan, P., 2015) can work against Colgate. Infrastructural challenges, currency fluctuation, counterfeit product, and local substitute brands can potentially have a significant impact on Colgate’s global

Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………4 Marketing Strategies of Toothpastes…………………………………………………...5 Crest…………………………………………………………………………………….5 History………………………………………………………………………………5 Types………………………………………………………………………………..6 Pricing………………………………………………………………………………6 Target Markets……………………………………………………………………...6 Advertising………………………………………………………………………….7 Colgate………………………………………………………………………………….7 History………………………………………………………………………………7

HRM 587 Discussions 1 Week 5 Organizational Development Theory and Practices-All Students Posts 20 Pages Managing Organization Change

Cook and Colgate are the parties in the case. The case can be found in volume 992 of the Federal Reporter, Second Series beginning on page 17. The case was decided by the United States Supreme Court Second Circuit in 1993.

If Clorox does not restructure its portfolio mix and increase revenue contribution from the growing markets, it faces the risk of losing sales and its position in those markets. Using its current resources, Clorox needs to determine how to allocate those resources among its current brand portfolio. Equally important is determining whether to invest in new product lines or brands. Clorox also has to decide whether to expand into international markets or focus strictly on expanding its market share across its brands in the primary U.S. market. Asian, South American, and European markets offer potential for growth but the cost of expanding into these markets and the limited availability of financial resources pose concerns with respect to international expansion. Focus on growth versus profitability is another important strategic decision that needs to be addressed. Clorox projects flat sales for 2011, which is not a positive indicator for investors’

Colgate-Palmolive Co (CP) was an international leader in household and personal care product, with the sales of $6.06 billion and profit of $2.76 billion in 1991. CP set up a five-year plan in 1991, pointing out that company needed to focus on new product launching and entry into new geographic markets by improving the manufacturing, distribution and the continuance of the core consumer products. Started from 1984, CP’s CEO awaked the company from “sleepy and inefficient” to profitable. Both gross margin and annual volume growth increased from 1985. Although everything seemed good, CP was facing the worldwide strong competitions from other companies. In order to have some protections, 170 CP’s

This initiative creates an impression of an environmentally friendly company hence creating a greater appeal for the company’s products. Colgate-Palmolive created 275 new products and introduced them to global markets in the last five years. The company then ensured product presence by building factories in China and Europe.

If Clorox does not restructure its portfolio mix and increase revenue contribution from the growing markets, it faces the risk of losing sales and its position in those markets. Using its current resources, Clorox needs to determine how to allocate those resources among its current brand portfolio. Equally important is determining whether to invest in new product lines or brands. Clorox also has to decide whether to expand into international markets or focus strictly on expanding its market share across its brands in the primary U.S. market. Asian, South American, and European markets offer potential for growth but the cost of expanding into these markets and the limited availability of financial resources pose concerns with respect to international expansion. Focus on growth versus profitability is another important strategic decision that needs to be addressed. Clorox projects flat sales for 2011, which is not a positive indicator for investors’

Colgate as a company strives to be the best company to have the best dental products. In an article from the website live strong Norma Chew wrote, “Colgate Palmolive Company is one of many companies that provide dental care products to the consumer.” Colgate as a company is expanding their products. Colgate was once only known for selling toothpaste, but now they have a wide variety of dental products to promote clean teeth.

In Mexico the promotional campaign was completely changed from the U.S. campaign and a third product flavor was introduced. The original two flavors were not changed, reducing costs compared to China. Costs in Mexico were kept low, and in the first two years Colgate saw a net profit in the Mexican market with Colgate Max Fresh. In China, however, many aspects of the marketing mix were changed, increasing costs tremendously. The product was changed by eliminating one of the two original flavors, changing the color of the other, and adding two new flavors. CP China’s management also tried a variety of packaging styles before choosing to use one that would increase the variable cost by 20% per unit. It turned out, however, that the design they chose was not up to CP’s global standards and after spending $1.5 million the idea was thrown out. The advertising campaign was changed to a riskier

Culture has progressed with many consumer merchandises that have become necessities and transformed into the day-to-day routines of society without having to think twice about it. CP or Colgate-Palmolive, is an icon for the personal hygiene industry throughout the United States, and as a worldwide company has positioned the brand as a most important home care in multiple foreign countries.The CMF line is CP’s most popular brand. The brand was a huge hit because of its individuality and the value that it crafted for consumers was astonishing. Colgate Max combined a new breath-strip and a mixture of therapeutics’, which added to more

product segments – Oral, Personal and Home Care; and Pet Nutrition. The company operates in more than 200 countries and this geographic diversity and balance help to reduce the Company’s exposure to businesses and other risks in any one country or part of the world. The company’s main competitors are Proctor & Gamble (PG), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Church Dwight & Company (CHD) and Clorox & Company (CLX).

This market study was based on the well-established Clorox Company which had originally started in 1913. In 2006, after the placement of the new CEO, the company had developed a strategic plan to position them for their 100th anniversary in 2013. The plan was titled “The Centennial Strategy” which focused on long-term accelerated growth and developed metrics to measure the success of the plan. The plan focused on accelerated sales growth which would come from extending existing brands to adjacent categories, entering new sales channels with its existing brands and increasing penetration in countries where Clorox already did business. The Clorox Company developed a “3D” structure consisting of desire, decide and delight. This

Question 3. Suggest guidelines for optimizing new product introductions for Colgate Palmolive worldwide. Provide appropriate justifications……………..……………………………….11

The understanding I now have of Organization Development came at a point in which I was personally experiencing it myself. As someone who has undergone a reduction in work force, this course helped me better understand why transitions happen in a company that is going through an economical or global change. As someone who has worked for over 30 years, I experienced this for the first time ever in my life. I did not quite know the gest of what it all meant because I did not have an understanding regarding