Colgate Precision Case Analysis

Hearst and the business team have three options, on one hand a line extension or new product positioned against Plax could be introduced into the market and in the other hand doing nothing and just looking at claims other than “breath” instead of adding a new product. Launching a new product “new pre-brushing rinse,” for example would cannibalize a part of Scope sales, also the delivery, marketing and capital costs of P&G will increase if a new rinse was launched and the user of Scope would be confused since he/she saw in the old scope a breath refreshment, taking into consideration that the new rinse is not any better than Plax in reducing plaque, but at the same time it may increase the market share of P&G and increase its profit. Whereas adding a new claim for Scope would not increase the volume of sales, but it could prevent current users of Scope to switch and it would stabilize the

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CP) launched a new toothbrush, Colgate Precision, to the market. But having developed for three years, CP was fiercely competing with other companies in the market. In order to have the power to fight in the highly competitive market with substantial product activity, Colgate-Palmolive Co. was in a problem of considering the how to position its new product--Precision, and to define the market strategy in terms of positioning, branding, and communication strategy. It provided some options with details to the reader, hence, for such purpose, this case would be a decision case, finding the optimum to segment the new product to the target and how it should be marketed.

Brand competitors and the diversity of choice that is available to consumers, puts brands under pressure to offer high quality products and service, excellent value and a wide availability (Clifton et al., 2009). Brands must differentiate themselves from the competition and create an unforgettable impression.

Crest proposes a brand licensing program to partners that are keen to leverage the crest brand to take on the challenge in delighting consumers with sense and simplicity.

So her specific task was to prepare a marketing plan for P&G mouthwash business for the next 3 years. In preparing the 3 year plan for Scope, a team has been formed within P&G to examine various options, the team included individuals from product development, manufacturing, sales, finance, market research and advertising operations. The team was faced by two options that are: 1- Launching a new line extension positioned against Plax as a recent entry into the market. 2- Looking at claims other than “breath” that might be used by scope such as plaque reduction.

Proctor and Gamble-Scope is faced with a very important decision, they need to prepare a marketing plan for P&G’s mouthwash business for the next three years. They want to know how they are going to be able to

The end of the first year, we had 30% of the products left, in view of the traditional market accounted for 40.5% of the overall toothpaste market, we decided to increase three sales people into traditional sales channels in the next year. Due to the selling of whole market Economy toothpaste are great, we add advertising investment. At the same time, the poor sell of children's toothpaste prompted us to reduce 5 million budgets on its advertising fee. According to the results of marketing, and sales of other companies, appropriate to improve the economy, white, healthy toothpaste price and their allowance, try to stimulate the sales.

By increasing successful and ideal operations and strengthening relationships with their customers, companies existing in this market diminish the significance of threat over newly accepted competitors. Toothpaste companies are still growing strongly, therefore additional firms are trying to enter the market to benefit from the increasing profits. However, most toothpaste companies have already made their name and their customers stay loyal to their brand, therefore it is hard to get into this market. With toothpaste being such a popular item and an essential in households,

For this reason, Gillette has always been trying to innovate in the market with new products. But they did not want their product to be bought just because they are a novelty but because it was perceived by the customer as a good quality product and have a staying power and product loyalty. This can be illustrated by the launch of the “Fusion” product by

A company named Goodbite has made a decision on launching a new product in the oral care market. They are interested in selling a teeth whitening strip with an advance scheme. The teeth whitening strips are small, elastic and can be adjusted to the surface of your teeth, being left in the mouth for several minutes helps on facilitating a whitening effect. The Goodbite’s product focuses on uniqueness by trying to select some attributes that might be considered as important. Its main competitive advantage focuses on product differentiation, which “deals with making changes in the marketing mix of a product so as to differentiate it from whatever the competition is offering” (“Product Differentiation”). The company differentiates from the

The United States, Mexican and Chinese markets all took very different approaches to the release of Colgate-Palmolive’s (CP) newest oral care product in 2004-2005. The new toothpaste is called Colgate Max Fresh (CMF). It is a cavity preventing gel with breath-freshening strips suspended in it that dissolve while consumers brush their teeth. The technology behind the breath strips is patented, and Colgate was hoping the product would be a big success by providing unique freshness.

Culture has progressed with many consumer merchandises that have become necessities and transformed into the day-to-day routines of society without having to think twice about it. CP or Colgate-Palmolive, is an icon for the personal hygiene industry throughout the United States, and as a worldwide company has positioned the brand as a most important home care in multiple foreign countries.The CMF line is CP’s most popular brand. The brand was a huge hit because of its individuality and the value that it crafted for consumers was astonishing. Colgate Max combined a new breath-strip and a mixture of therapeutics’, which added to more

Question 3. Suggest guidelines for optimizing new product introductions for Colgate Palmolive worldwide. Provide appropriate justifications……………..……………………………….11

Seeing the company records of Canadian Mouthwash Market Shares for past three years, I feel that the performance of scope in market was consistent despite the arrival of new products in market.

Context: In 2009, India was the world’s largest democracy; with a population of 1.16billion growing at 1.4% per annum, the country suffered from a huge disparity in income with the majority of Indian population (78%) living in rural areas, and as many as 80% living under $2 per day. The 78% who lived in rural areas accounted for c. 64% of total expenditures in India. Around 50% of the Indian population did not have sufficient awareness of dental healthcare, and did not associate dental problems with improper care but rather to eating habits or genetics; most of these Indians were using natural remedies as chewing twigs from the Neem tree. Among the remaining population who used modern dental healthcare or a toothbrush, 77% brushed their teeth less than twice a day (recommended usage), and out of the 747.1million brushes sold every year, only 8.6% replaced their brush every 3 months. Cottle-Taylor (CT) enjoyed a large market share in India and focused on toothbrushes. Given the peculiarities of the market, CT decided to focus on toothbrushes where it enjoys larger gross margins by virtue of its existing manufacturing infrastructure that has been built over the years.