Collaborative Strategy
Describe the implementation of the strategy.
5 pts Describe the effectiveness of the strategy. What went well? What did students struggle with?
10 pts Will you use this strategy again? Why or why not?
2.5 pts
Silent interview During this first day of the 20, students have already been in class with one another for a couple of weeks. However, these students have been familiar with one another for many years, so to implement this strategy, we focused on what each student’s partner 1. Enjoyed the most over their summer break, 2. What they want to accomplish during the school year, and 3. What their biggest strengths are in English. Students were asked to work silently on paper to ask enough questions about these topics that they can tell the class about the other person. This was a difficult strategy to implement, since the students already know each other very well. Students enjoyed the idea of interviewing a classmate without speaking. They
…show more content…
Students were posed with questions found throughout the chapter after reading. Students had to work together to respond the questions, ensuring that each member of the group knew each answer. As we discussed the questions as a class, I would call on a table and then choose a number to respond to the question. Overall this strategy worked somewhat effectivley. Students seemed to know the repsonse to each question, because of the time students were able to take during their discussions. Some students were very focused on the task, because they did not know who would be called on, others had difficulties focusing their discussions on the text. I think this is probably one of the only strategies that I do not plan to use again in the future. Students did not seem to enjoy the lesson, therefore many students did not fully participate. I just did not think that this strategy worked within my classroom
John does not socialize with his classmates but he will communicate academically with one student. The seating arrangement was modified to allow these two students to sit adjacent to each other. These changes could foster social communication for John.
(1987) described this form of instruction as a systematic method of teaching with emphasis on proceeding in small steps, checking for student understanding, and achieving active and successful participation by all students. I have also used the strategy as reference for determining the strengths and weaknesses of my lesson. After conducting in class lesson and reviewing my video lesson multiple times, I was able to identify my strengths
Wednesday, September 2, 2015 was our first SWK 305 class day. In order to break the ice between all of the students in class Professor Lori Spector had everyone go around introducing themselves, we had to say our names and a adjective describing us using the first letter of our name, I am Radiant Rose. I thought this icebreaker was creative because at the end of the class even if I haven’t remembered the persons name I did remember the adjective they used. The next activity was to get familiar with someone in your group and introduce him or her to the rest of the class. Being that my group was composed of a trio I assume we had a different experience than those who had a pair. This exercise helped me create connections with some of my peers,
By using the artwork of the fantastic four (John Haward 2001) Appendix 1, I will explore how a team is different from a group. For this I will describe an award given to me as part of a team while working in a nurse led minor injury unit (MIU). By comparing the differences I shall highlight what makes a team effective rather than a collection of people.
How successful was the lesson? Did the students learn what you intended for them to learn? How do you know?
With a small group, discuss the following questions. Choose someone to read the question out loud, and direct the discussion so that each person can offer his/her opinion on the topic. Have another student record the group’s response and choose a third student to report the information gathered to the class in a discussion.
I believe my strategies and activities engaged students because students like to come to the front and filled in the missing
In the summer of 2005 I had the opportunity to intern at The Franklin Institute Museum in PA. This museum is one of the many well known science museums across the country. The Franklin Institute Museum is a unique museum that gives the experience of exploring science in a fun and fascinating way. The museum touches bases on many areas of science such as, anatomy, physics, environmental sciences, and space. The Franklin Institute is named after Benjamin Franklin and is the home of his national memorial statue. It was founded in 1824 and its first building was established in 1825; since then its location has changed with in the city of Philadelphia but it still remains to be one
I observed that the students were finding themselves hard to concentrate on the lesson plan and I believe there were couple of reasons why the lesson failed to captivate the interest of the students. One of the reason is because, the activity of watching a movie and answering couple questions lacked the critical thinking process. Also, the students had to watch the same story videos from different websites which just seemed meaningless. The materials were extremely repetitive. Throughout the lesson, students had hard time sitting still and seem to lack interest; their heads were on the desks. Lastly, there were no hooks in the lesson plan to captivate the students that will make them desire to learn the
Dr Katie Schlenker Ph: 9514 5303 Fax: 9514 5195 Email: Katie.Schlenker@uts.edu.au TUTORS Ashlee Morgan Email: Ashlee.Morgan@uts.edu.au Barbara Almond Email: Barbara.Almond-1@uts.edu.au LECTURE: Thursday 10:00 – 12:00; KG02.04.16 TUTORIALS: Thursday 12:00 – 13:00; KG02.04.64 – Ashlee Morgan (Tut 01) Thursday 12:00 – 13:00; KG02.04.63 – Barbara Almond (Tut 02) Thursday 13:00 – 14:00; KG02.04.64 – Ashlee Morgan (Tut 03) Thursday 13:00 – 14:00; KG02.04.63 – Barbara Almond (Tut 04) Thursday 14:00 – 15:00; KG02.04.64 – Ashlee
I deeply value the spirit of collaboration that exists at Columbia, allowing some of the best young minds in the country work together to learn, research, and change the world. The Common Core curriculum is a major part of what makes Columbia such a closely-knit community. Because the entirety of the diverse student population takes a set of the same courses, they all have shared experiences to connect over. The Common Core promotes deep intellectual discussions which bring out the unique perspective of every student, allowing them to learn from each other. The advising system at Columbia also contributes to this culture of collaboration. One’s fellow students can also be his or her mentors or advisers, supporting him or her and helping him and her learn, grow, and find new opportunities. The small class sizes contribute to this culture as well, by helping students to form closer relationships both among themselves and with their professors.
Now, show your list of everyday, ordinary activities to a seatmate. After that, move around to see also the everyday of your classmates. Then, go back to your seats and let’s talk.
Leadership can take many different forms, depending on the person and the situation in which it is needed. Collaborative leadership is a leadership style in which a leader brings together a large group of people, with a variety of backgrounds, to make a productive decision and act upon it. According to Chrislip and Larson (1994):
Although the center has done a creditable work, they still need variety supplies ranging from the inside of the house to the outer environment. Still, what I can comment all that remain my own observation requiring a collaborative strategy for action. Despite the fact, Langley, (2009) emphasizes that initiative for change beginning with a small change which may lead to a fruitful improvement of the problem. In my view, people assume that when thinking of change, it signifies enormous address of each prevailing problem. At the end, agents of change overwhelm while losing control and resources, leaving the situation even worse than previously. The idea of change requires sharing with it with interested people as noted earlier, including the marginalized whom with enthusiastic we seek to improve their current state of life.
This about how to work with groups and other team members, most of the time it is hard to do but with our jobs nowadays we have to do what we have to do. I like working with others for the most part, especially when they are motivated in getting the job done in a timely manner. Then we have some that just don’t want to help but want everybody else to do their work for them.