Introduction
The right to associate (join a union) is a statutory (legally protected) right in Canada, but collective bargaining has not yet been ratified as a constitutional or human right (though the debate of such has been ongoing for decades). A human right is defined as a right inherent to all individuals, “as a part of their fundamental existence as human beings” to create/preserve dignity (Foster, 2011, p. 34). The basic disunion between the concepts of collective bargaining for economic parity and human rights for democratic and social equality lays the foundation for the ongoing argument: should collective bargaining be recognized as a human right?
Included in the analysis to follow are how historical perceptions of collective bargaining
…show more content…
Canada falls short in many areas, primarily in the basic international standard that “all issues that influence worker well-being should be negotiable” (Adams, 2008, p. 58). Constitutionally, Canada continues to enforce collective bargaining as an economic right, giving no credence to how social and political decisions in the workplace affect workers (Adams, 2008, p. 51). Even though the Supreme Court of Canada affirmed collective bargaining’s human right status in 2007’s BC Health Services Decision, it did not embrace the ILO’s standards fully (Savage, 2008, p. 72). There has been no tangible change in legislation or within the labour movement to denote any progress since that decision (Savage, 2008, p. …show more content…
24). It is democratic in nature but, like management, will bargain based on how it represents workers and the values held by membership. The democratic nature of unions increases the complexity of decision-making (Foster, 2011, p. 24). The power and stability of unions might shift if collective bargaining were to become a human right, and the strength of the labour movement would wane (Savage, 2008, p. 69). Unions would have to give up power and the rigid, government-certified structures currently in place in favour of independent organizations that workers might want representing them (Adams, 2008, p. 59). As well, unions would have to eliminate mandatory union membership and dues as they contravene the “basic principles of freedom of association” (Adams, 2008, p.
This video covers a lot of the growth and stunt of unions throughout the 20th century. As the video states “The Canadian labour movement has been one of the enormous struggle and commitment. Throughout, government as played a prominent role in defining rights of workers and the power of employers. This is the story of the government as a friend and foe of Canadian workers” (Taylor). There were several events in recent Canadian history where the government has intervened and the workers end up in a worse position then they started with.
Unions have a long and sometimes contentious history in Canada, although they are also the source of many of the labour laws and standards that we have come to accept as normal. However, since the 1980s, an increasing trend towards favouring neoliberal policies has erased many of the social welfare and employment standards gains by unions, with particularly harsh effects on more vulnerable populations including women, immigrants, younger workers, and Aboriginal peoples. A striking example of these shifts is seen in the restaurant sector in B.C., where recent controversies with Canada’s temporary foreign worker program has at least brought some discussions of worker’s rights to the headlines in regional and national newspapers. Unfortunately, despite this new attention the current political climate continues to be hostile to workers’ groups and to workers’ rights.
The right-to-work legislation proponents call the right to work without paying dues or joining a union a “fundamental human right”1 whilst its opponents call it a ‘Right-to-Work-for-Less,’2. The key issue creating this dichotomy is the same dichotomy of perception about unions we discussed last week. After press releases and national coverage of union leader corruption, unions no longer could be trusted. Business owners fear unions as they slow the processes of their organization and require extra steps to make decisions in their human resource departments. The cost of having a unionized workforce is high when time is considered of value. For individuals, the dues and fees associated may be vital income lost each year1. If no real value is seen from the union consistently, that dollar value seems more like a loss or an empty promise rather than a paid protection of rights. The promises of the right-to-work legislation include, “a higher employment rate, after-tax income for employees, population growth, foreign direct investment (FDI), and a lower cost of living than states that have not implemented this law,”4. These states, however, also are less densely populated, have largely agricultural or industrial economies, and are home to several blue collar workers who have been disenfranchised during the shift from a product based economy to a service based
Before the 1930s, labor unions had little to no voice in the contracts of industrialized companies. Labor Unions “are organizations of workers whose primary objectives are to improve the pecuniary and nonpecuniary conditions or employment among their members” (Ehrenberg & Smith, pg. 451). The Christian Labour Association of Canada (CLAC) and the United Automobiles Workers (UAW) are different unions in Canada and the Unites States. Even though they have some similarities, the two groups have many differences as well. Some similarities include how they bargain and negotiate. However, they differ in the type of union, what they stand for, how large they are, why and when they started, and what they negotiate for.
To begin with the most important role is that Unions have undoubtedly been a leading force in refining and transform the laws by democratizing the economies of each nation. Like it has been mentioned previously that unions play a vital role in increasing and sustaining democracy of the society, unions are significantly important for democracy, not just in the working institution, but also in the society :-globally, nationally, and locally. Unions make democracy work more desirable and suitable, they stress for more useful policies to be used for socially, economically and environmentally. A justified and democratic society relies on an active and free labor movement. It is undoubtedly countries where there are active and free labor union
Canada has a long history of labour education. The main themes in the history of Canadian labour education and how did the purposes and practices of Canadian labour education change during the 20th century will be discussed throughout this assignment.
Unionization offers employees a method for countering employers’ powers to unilaterally change employment conditions. Members elect officers and may hire agents to bargain an employment contract with the owners’ manager. Unionization introduces democracy into the employment relationship. Employees determine, first, whether a majority desires to be represented; second, whom to elect as leaders or hire as agents; third, what workplace issues are most important to them; and fourth, whether to accept a proposed contract or to collectively withhold their labor (Fossum, J, (n.d.), p. 2).
Surprisingly, there are more women unionized today than there have been in the past. Women currently account for more than half of Canada’s unionized workforce, with the greatest amount of membership in the past three decades. (Canadian Labour Congress, 2009) Within CUPE, women account for approximately 67% of all members, making them the majority of the union participation rate (CUPE Women, n.d.). However, there are still some within the workforce that cannot or choose not to participate in the union. Despite, all attempts that CUPE has made to actively involve them, this group of non-involved workers continues to experience barriers that have led to their lack of vigorous participation.
With over 30% of the working population of Canada being members of unions, meaning over 18 million Canadian citizens are working in unionized conditions, there’s no doubt that unions have an influence on our society and workers. But, is their role valuable? There are many aspects about union memberships that facilitates life for it’s workers. Unions are designed to create fairness and equality between all of it’s members, creating a just and healthy environment for everyone. They support and defend members who are struggling or suffer from an injury which prevents them from working. Unions also create job security to it’s members, something very valuable especially to lower-class and family providing members. Unions seem to be able to provide
Unions make the workplace less competitive since non-unionized companies in India, China, and Taiwan can compensate workers far less and therefore charge less per unit of production. We 're no longer in a national economy; we 're in a global economy. Products and services which could be developed in Canada are now being made at a lower cost in foreign countries for instance, China and India, which have sizeable pools of inexpensive labour. Encumbering Canadian company with an unrealistic and inflexible labour cost per hour effectively makes it impossible for companies to compete. Example, Canadian automakers now must pay two to three times that of car makers in Japan, mostly because of union-required wages and benefits. In effect, China is now predicted to pass North America in economic power within 5 to 10 years.
As a leading union and voice of workers employed in 26 sectors of the Canadian economy, at UFCW Canada we believe that respecting each other’s cultural traditions and ethnic identities is pivotal to supporting the rights and freedoms of all workers in Canada. By taking a stand to support the human rights of all workers in the workplace, we support diversity through inclusion. By better understanding the historical injustices endured by First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples in Canada today and supporting Aboriginal issues locally, provincially and federally, we support the human rights of all Canadians.
Workers in the United States now have rights that protect them from the abuses of the past. According to Pamela M. Prah, a veteran reporter for CQ Researcher, “Unions were created in an era before employment laws required safe working conditions, a minimum wage, unemployment benefits or protections against discrimination”(713). Employers are now required to have a list of workers rights accessible to all of its employees, and if an employer violates any worker protected right they are subject to fines and penalties. Unions have been an influential part of society during the later part of the nineteenth century and throughout the twentieth
This Paper is a systematic review of articles relating to labor unions and how they affect the workplace. Labor unions are becoming a part of the past workforce as we move forward into the modern workforce and the right to work laws. In general the literature pointed to many different benefits of having a unionized workforce. These benefits are on both sides of the line, employees and employers. These benefits can range from group bargaining during contracts, protective action when to come to discipline, and overall organization for employees. On the employers side the union brings organization when it comes to discipline, and gives direction when it comes to policies and procedures.
David Brody argues that the rise of contractual or collective bargaining relationships during the post WWII era formalized the relationship between employers and unions. The use of collective bargaining agreements to resolve workplace disputes weakened unions and the power of workers. Other actions, such as using collection bargaining as a form of substitution for direct action and using it instead of the strike for grievance and arbitration procedure served , also has weakened the unions and the power of workers. The rise of contractual or collective bargaining relationships changed the dynamic of the workplace, shifting the power from the union side to towards the employers. The perspective could best be argued suing Weber’s theory and
Collective bargaining is when employers and employees negotiate the terms of their work. Republicans in Iowa now want to get rid of this section of the Iowa Code. Many states have done away with collective bargaining for public workers. States how get rid of collective bargaining affects all public union employees, including police officers, firefighters, teachers, sanitation workers, water works staffers, snow plowers, corrections workers, transportation workers, and some public hospital employees. According to the Iowa Starting Line, “the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees or AFSCME bargains contracts every two years for around 18,000 state employees, police negotiate separate contracts with the state, the county courthouse bargains contracts with their county and teachers and school staff negotiate with their school district.” (Prynard 2017) Public workers are the ones in trouble to losing their say in their contracts, others who are employed by private companies do not need to worry about collective bargaining being changed or eliminated.