Transformations within organizations are taking place globally on a regular basis including the way in which work is performed. There has also been a growing reliance on working in teams (Nathan. J Hiller; 2006 ). When asked to define leadership, it is difficult not to think of a single individual providing direction and inspiration to a group of followers. The definition of collective leadership that will be used as we move forward in our discussion of the proposed framework is that it is a dynamic leadership process in which a defined leader, or set of leaders, selectively utilize skills and expertise within a network, effectively distributing elements of the leadership role as the situation or problem at hand requires (Tamara. L Friederich., …show more content…
As much as collective leadership provides us with multiple benefits, there are also factors which may hamper the smooth sailing of it. People have different preferences in completing tasks. Some prefer to work much in advance and some people believe in working last minute as they work best under pressure. In such a case it becomes increasingly difficult to coordinate tasks among different people as their work preferences are not the same. Similarly, competition may arise between co-workers which may result in individuals focusing more on outdoing one another instead of working together to achieve a common goal. By having multiple leaders, challenges may arise when dealing with disagreements within the group as each individual desires to voice out their own opinion (which some or maybe all, may not agree with) and that may trigger conflict and arguments within the group as no one is willing to compromise. In such cases, a single voice is required which will decide on the final decision. These challenges are able to affect any kind of organization and are the aspects which may hamper many organizations from implementing the collective leadership
Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 387-397. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004
Leadership isn't just about one person being in charge, it's about a group of people who strive
Classical organisational theorist defined leadership in terms of achieving a group’s objectives R.C Davies (1942) referred to leadership as “the principle dynamic forces that motivates and coordinates the organisation in the accomplishment of its objectives.” Similarly, Urwick (1953) stated that the leader is “the personification of common purpose not only to all who work under taking, but to everyone outside it.” K. Davies (1962) defined leadership as “the human factor which binds a group together and motivates it towards goals.” Cattell (1951) took the extreme position that leadership is whatever or whoever contributes to the group’s performance. To measure each members Leadership, Cattell noted, removed him or her from the group, one at a time, and observe what happens to the group’s performance. Calder (1977) and Pfeffer (1977) “stated that leadership is mainly influence and is even attributed to participants after the fact.
Throughout this entire course we have learned many concepts and strategies to synthesize and use leadership as a means of working in a group setting. These concepts allowed us to learn not only how to lead other
Abstract: There are numerous definitions of leadership, all of which contain elements related to people (the leader and the follower(s)), communicating in person or by the written word, actions (organizing, directing, coaching, and/or motivating), and for a purpose (meeting a goal(s) or accomplishing a task(s)) (ADP 6-22) (Fisher 2015) (Bolden 2013) (Hogan 2005). Additionally, everything done occurs within a given context. Effective leaders are poised, proficient, pertinent, and practical in the application of the art of leadership. This means leaders are ready to engage the group with effective methods and
One major disadvantage of collective leadership is that the decision making can be a slow and time intensive process. It is also a risk if you are working with sensitive materials because, there are so many people involved from an early stage.
Every successful team begins with a quality leader. Without a leader in place projects and tasks may become chaotic, overwhelming, or unachievable. Kelly (2012) defines leadership as, “A process of influence in which the leader influences others toward goal achievement” (p. 2). Leadership can occur in different forms and styles. Some of those different styles include democratic, laissez-faire, autocratic, and transformational.
The book selected for the assignment is, ‘Be a people person: Effective leadership through effective relationships,’ by John C. Maxwell. Mr. Maxwell is an author, speaker, leadership expert who is internationally recognized and a pastor. He wrote books on leadership (The John Maxwell Company, n.d.). He has a doctorate in ministry and started his career as a pastor. After 14 years of preaching the word of God, he devoted himself to speaking and writing. He became a religious leader (Christian Books Previews, n.d.). Maxwell has recognized the role of interpersonal relationships in making and breaking a leader. He has also realized the importance of developing personal skills from the people (Victor Books, 2002). In his book, Maxwell explains how a person who follows can turn to a leader by connecting with people and relating to them from a biblical perspective. The author places 50 percent emphasis on others, 25 percent on self and the remaining 25 percent on God in his approach to the followers (Barnes and Noble, n.d.).
Over the years, a great deal of time, and research has been dedicate to the study of leadership. Even with extensive data on the topic, many still disagree on what leadership really means. Hence, leadership is a word that has many different meanings and different researched theories associated with it. On a basic level, leadership involves having and establishing a clear vision, sharing that vision with followers, respecting followers, and leading an organization with excellence while ensuring that everyone is part of the team. Leadership is also a method by which a leader uses his or her influence towards getting a group of followers to take ownership or buy into a vision.
Leadership is a process of influencing activities of a particular group of people with the aim of attaining certain stipulated goals. In defining leadership there is need to consider a particular group, the common goals and the duties that are allocated to specific members of the group depending on their abilities (Fiedler 1976). Leadership therefore cannot successfully occur unless members of the group are given different considerations in terms of personality, traits and responsibilities. In considering leadership, it is important to look at the leader, the group or organization they are leading, the members as individuals and the situation; these are
The foremost is the joining of two leader minds, skills, abilities and leadership styles. The weak points of one leader can be conquered by the strengths of the other leader. One leadership style has many strengths and flaws where the merger of two different leadership styles can be advantageous in this respect. The authorities and the task can be distributed among the leaders which enable them to focus on their certain task and responsibility. Thus, it shares the work load of the leader and leader can fully focus on the particular responsibility. But, on the other hand this sharing of work may become the reason of conflict among the leaders in case of inappropriate distribution. The authority level also creates obstacles in this idea and the difference in perception and to work in a team may also arise as the weakness of this
Leadership can take many different forms, depending on the person and the situation in which it is needed. Collaborative leadership is a leadership style in which a leader brings together a large group of people, with a variety of backgrounds, to make a productive decision and act upon it. According to Chrislip and Larson (1994):
Leadership has been studied extensively and many varying definitions exist. Hughes, Ginnett and Curphy (2015, p.4) review many of these definitions and consequently describe leadership as ‘the process of influencing an organised group towards its goals’. Leadership involves the interplay of a range of different factors, not least the leader themselves, the followers and the situation. For
Despite the advantages associated with a shared leadership approach, some disadvantages also exist. One disadvantage originates from individual interpretations of teamwork (Baghai & Quigley, 2012). In other words, not all people in a work environment view working together the same, posing a leadership challenge to clearly delineate the organization’s concept of team. Other disadvantages arise when workers chose to bypass or overlook some team members, or when an individual lacks the confidence to exhibit leadership skills resulting in organizational loss of leadership potential (Pearce, Wassenaar, & Manz, 2014).
For decade’s individuals, companies, and organizations have spent an unprecedented amount of money on researching, molding, modeling and working to define what a leader is and what characteristics make successful leaders. Despite all the research, there is not a quick answer or even full agreement as to what makes an individual an effective leader. The definition of a leader is “someone who can influence others and who has managerial authority.” (Robbins, Decenzo, Coulter, 2015. P.370)